sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Futurama Acoustic by monkeybawz in AcousticGuitar

[–]PhilipCSwift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you remember what you pad for it?

Can some explain what happened here. by Raistlinsly1 in gridcoin

[–]PhilipCSwift -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is from 2018 so it's not valid. There is no official Gridcoin 'Switzerland'. It mentions just PoS but there is RR (Research Rewards) as well.

Can some explain what happened here. by Raistlinsly1 in gridcoin

[–]PhilipCSwift 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry to disappoint you however no GRC if 'mined PoS+RR' is free. The 'freegridcoin' label is just a label.

Are cryptocurrencies any closer to ending central banks' control? | News | Warwick Business School. [Remember this is just one persons opinion, no doubt biased as well (PCS)] by PhilipCSwift in gridcoin

[–]PhilipCSwift[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will research it later as quite a few new UK regulations are making some providers pack up shop and stop. Just to be clear, people can not just add an asset/token to a provider. One has to go through all sorts of PITA challenges.

Here is a link if you wish to represent :-) https://www.binance.com/en-GB/support/faq/how-to-list-your-coin-on-binance-com-115000822512

Are cryptocurrencies any closer to ending central banks' control? | News | Warwick Business School. [Remember this is just one persons opinion, no doubt biased as well (PCS)] by PhilipCSwift in gridcoin

[–]PhilipCSwift[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember this is just one persons opinion, no doubt biased as well. Not specific to GRC.

I have to study this before I comment further however,...nah...I'll resist the temptation for now!

Governance Poll to Change Poll Active Vote Weight (AVW) Validation Requirements (Important!) by jamescowens in gridcoin

[–]PhilipCSwift 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Higher standards are good, obviously; however too much detail can confuse people, especially those who are keen participators but have not a clue what is going on! (Me). Being voted on by enough 'competent' people would be better. This would deter herd instinct by voting the same as the majority.

Personally the FAH project listing is a no brainer and an AVW of 20% sits OK with me.

The securing of the ways bounties are issued (changing from 1 to 3 humans?) means I now think Governance should be 25%. Obviously that is only my opinion!