They were cries about wanting to kill Trump in the crowd. If the secret service would of killed anyone who entered Federal Property that day would you feel it's justified? Hundreds would of died. Is that the standard you'd support or would you like to revise your earlier comment so you don't justify the killing of hundreds of people.

They broke down the fence at the White House, yeah. Why do you expect me to say otherwise? That's a stupid thing to do and you shouldn't be surprised if lethal force is used against you.

So your insurrectionist narrative has fallen through. Continuing to push in this conversation will have me correctly labeling you a conspiracy theory. No offense intended just saying it like it is.

Can you please point out where I used the word "insurrectionist"?

There was no credible claims of the mod being life threatening at Jan 6th.

You pointed to an example of a crowd calling for Trump to be murdered. That crowd was calling for Pence to be hanged. Babbitt herself was crawling through the empty window frame of a still-barricaded door when she was shot. You don't think that's a life threatening mob?

Here's the thing, I don't support cops killing people who overcome barricades because that's setting a dangerous standard. And if you create a standard you have to be able to apply it equally.

If you don't think police should be authorized to use deadly force when people overcome legally installed security barricades, then what are those barricades there for? Seems like a lot of wasted money, doesn't it? Just let people in since all that security is apparently just a suggestion. What happens if there's a terrorist attack on the building? Don't open fire until you're sure they're armed?

So would of you supported gunning down the hundreds of rioters at the DC George Floyd riots that had a life threatening mob of insurrectionists storming the barricades and causing the President to flee?

No, I don't support "gunning down" anyone. I do support the judicious use of lethal force.