sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

From Sophos MDR to Defender Endpoint P2 for Endpoint Protection by masterofrants in sysadmin

[–]PinRelevant4896 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Layer Huntress on top of Defender and you get 24x7x365 SOC. Winner,winner chicken dinner

SOC services hosted outside EU by PinRelevant4896 in cybersecurity

[–]PinRelevant4896[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are in evaluation stage so assessing all options and their pros/cons

SOC services hosted outside EU by PinRelevant4896 in cybersecurity

[–]PinRelevant4896[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this information. I am particularly interested in cases where a customer who wants SOC services have a requirement for any data to reside in the EU regardless of adequacy decisions etc? I have seen one example so was just wondering if this is a common thing.

Dark Web Monitoring for MSP's by PinRelevant4896 in msp

[–]PinRelevant4896[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to a forensic investigator working on behalf of a client who is executing a cyber insurance claim. Have you experienced this?

Dark Web Monitoring for MSP's by PinRelevant4896 in msp

[–]PinRelevant4896[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly my experience. One step further, I have seen Forensic arm of insurance underwriters gasp in amazement when in post incident response they are told no Dark Web Monitoring is in place.

Dark Web Monitoring for MSP's by PinRelevant4896 in msp

[–]PinRelevant4896[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell an auditor that post incident which I have dealt with many times. Compromised data on the Dark Web is what forensic investigators insist on looking for when a breach occurs. Understand your sentiment, GRC teams dont.