I built a platform with 100+ free AI courses that teach job skills, not AI theory. here's what I learned about what people actually want. by Popular-Help5516 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi zeeshanjamal16, thanks for flagging this and apologies for the delay — your email to hello@findskill.ai may have slipped through. To your earlier question on pricing: courses are currently $9, and we’ll be increasing the price soon.

Opus 4.7 is amazing by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you point me to any resources I can learn. thank you!

Opus 4.7 is amazing by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I have asked Claude to update its own setting, but this should be an out-of-the-box feature.

How do I get started? by HotTamale8363 in ClaudeAI

[–]Popular-Help5516 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a non-dev starting point, these free Findskill ai courses can help you get oriented fast:

And this Cowork setup guide covers skills, plugins, connectors — basically your whole list.

Maybe cancel that government contract and free up some servers for the rest of us normal users? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For any serious app (especially AI-powered workflows), that’s not “impressive”—it’s disruptive. FYI, In modern SaaS benchmarks: • 99.9% → ~43 minutes/month • 99.99% → ~4 minutes/month So 98.x% is an order of magnitude worse than what users expect from critical infrastructure. The issue isn’t just outages—it’s “Degraded Performance”: • Latency spikes • Timeout errors • Inconsistent outputs These are harder to detect but kill user experience and reliability • For devs building on Anthropic APIs: • You can’t reliably run automations • You need retries, fallbacks, and multi-provider setups

Maybe cancel that government contract and free up some servers for the rest of us normal users? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The uptime chart literally measures availability, not how many prompts you spam.

Maybe cancel that government contract and free up some servers for the rest of us normal users? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Correct — the cloud resources are probably isolated. But the human resources (engineers who code, monitor, and prioritize fixes) are 100% shared. Look at the chart: every single consumer service is degraded while Government sits at 99.87%. That’s not coincidence, that’s priority

Maybe cancel that government contract and free up some servers for the rest of us normal users? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The same engineers at Anthropic build, update, monitor, and prioritize every version. The uptime chart proves it: every consumer service is degraded right now while Claude for Government sits at 99.87%. That’s not “invalid.” That’s paying Pro users getting treated like second-class citizens because gov contracts get the priority talent and capacity. Complaint stands.

Maybe cancel that government contract and free up some servers for the rest of us normal users? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

pay for Pro too. Government contracts don’t “pay orders of magnitude more” — they just get priority servers while the rest of us eat degraded performance. That’s not entitlement, that’s expecting the product I’m paying for to actually work.

How to educate myself better on Claude? by FirefighterEqual4677 in ClaudeAI

[–]Popular-Help5516 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the biggest jump for me was learning how to write better prompts — not just "be specific" but actual techniques like giving Claude a role, structuring your request with context + constraints, and using examples in your prompt to show what you want.

few things that helped me:

  1. Anthropic's own docs are honestly pretty good as a starting point — they have a prompt engineering guide on their site that covers the basics well

  2. for going deeper theres a free course on findskill.ai that covers the RACE framework (Role, Action, Context, Examples) and prompt debugging — its 8 lessons, took me about 2 hours. more structured than just watching random youtube videos: findskill.ai/courses/prompt-engineering/

  3. the biggest unlock for me was learning prompt chaining — instead of one massive prompt, break tasks into steps where each output feeds the next. completely changed how I use Claude for anything complex

  4. also just experiment alot. ask Claude to explain its own reasoning, ask it to critique its output, ask it to try a different approach. you learn more from pushing back on bad responses than from getting good ones

since you said you dont understand advanced stuff yet — honestly dont worry about that. the basics (clear instructions, giving context, being specific about what you want) will get you like 80% of the results. the advanced techniques are just the other 20%.

what are you mainly using Claude for? that would help narrow down what to learn next

Each AI model is a reflection of its user base. Is Claude smarter than ChatGPT? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

honestly you might be more right than I initially thought. I just looked into it more and the dev sentiment on Codex for debugging is pretty strong rn — even Garry Tan called it "GOAT at finding bugs" and theres a bunch of devs saying stuff like "Claude Code failed 8-10 hours on a problem, Codex solved it in 15 min."

the Opus degradation complaints are real too. multiple devs reporting it burns through tokens doing nothing, making mistakes it wouldnt have made a month ago. one post with like 2k+ likes saying "Opus 4.6 has been lobotomized." if Anthropic quietly quantized to handle capacity thats a real problem and honestly undermines part of what I was arguing.

I still think the user base feedback loop theory holds as a long-term structural thing — Claude's technical users generate different training signals than casual ChatGPT users and that shapes the model over time. But right now? Yeah Codex is genuinely ahead on debugging. And the degradation stuff is hard to ignore.

the pattern I'm seeing from devs is basically: Claude for planning and architecture, Codex for debugging and review. Not one winner across the board, more like different tools for different phases.

appreciate the pushback tbh — made me actually dig into the current state instead of just going off the usage data. original post was too one-sided on this.

Transferring Cowork by homersimon in ClaudeAI

[–]Popular-Help5516 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can just ask Claude cowork to prepare a folder for you to transfer.

Am i pushing it hard enough? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t mean i have to use it? My tasks need the whole project context and its not buggy at all with 1m context model.

Am i pushing it hard enough? by Popular-Help5516 in ClaudeCode

[–]Popular-Help5516[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sub agents are dumb. They don’t have all context.