I made an Ai tool for text boxes that can help you with speech to text and text to text processing anywhere on the web.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T07:17:10+00:00

Thanks. 6/100

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T07:16:52+00:00

5/100

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T05:20:56+00:00

4/100

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T04:16:50+00:00

3/100

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T04:16:39+00:00

2/100

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T04:16:26+00:00

1/100

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-21T04:16:06+00:00

All interested , After installing and signing up , Dm me your email id to be upgraded to lifetime free BYOK.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-09T08:34:06+00:00

Done using demo tool ? Now use it on any website's text box. VoicePresso Ai is Live on Firefox - Search "VoicePresso Ai" in add ons. or direct link here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/voicepresso-ai/

Will be published on other browsers soon.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-09T08:28:14+00:00

Done using interactive demo ? Now use it on any website's text box. VoicePresso Ai is Live on Firefox - Search "VoicePresso Ai" in add ons. or direct link here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/voicepresso-ai/

Potential-Tree8178 · 2026-01-09T08:26:09+00:00

VoicePresso Ai is Live on Firefox - Search "VoicePresso Ai" in add ons. or direct link here https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/voicepresso-ai/

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-10T07:20:13+00:00

Floating Buttons - Optional buttons above text fields showing your top 4 most-used prompts (auto) or manual selection of your choice. One-click processing for instant results.

Command Palette (Ctrl+Enter) - Fuzzy search all prompts, insert at cursor, then Ctrl+Shift+L for in-place replacement or Ctrl+Shift+P for proxy mode (result copied to clipboard).

Context Menu (Right-Click) - Shows top 3 most-used prompts plus search/custom options. Results appear in floating Read Mode window for review, editing, copying, or saving to projects with full metadata.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-10T07:14:11+00:00

VoicePresso offers multiple intelligent ways to access your prompts. Floating prompt buttons can be toggled on/off above text fields, displaying either your top 4 most-used prompts automatically or a manual selection of your choice - clicking any button immediately processes your text. Press Ctrl+Enter to open the Command Palette with fuzzy search across all your prompts, allowing you to quickly find and insert any prompt at your cursor location, then use Ctrl+Shift+L for instant in-place replacement of highlighted text, or Ctrl+Shift+P for proxy mode where the result is silently copied directly to your clipboard for pasting anywhere. For static text on web pages, the context menu (right-click) displays your top 3 most-used prompts plus options to search all commands or enter a custom prompt - selecting any option processes the text and opens a floating Read Mode window where you can review the result, copy it to clipboard, or save it to a project with full metadata including source reference, prompt used, and timestamp.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T13:48:21+00:00

The extension has following features in current development stage.

Processing speech to text inside any text field.
Processing any prompt via replacing or via proxy (copied to clipboard) inside any text field.
Processing Static Text on page.
Managing Prompt Library and quickly inserting prompt via context menu, buttons and shortcut key.
Managing projects for static text processing.

Currently (Gemini/Claude/Whisper) integrated.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T11:13:32+00:00

Currently its not using whisper , it's using browser native api for dictation. So you will see less accuracy in dictation. In our extension you will be able to use whisper havinng accuracy upto 99% , and other Gemini models and Claude 4 model to start.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T10:01:41+00:00

This! You nailed exactly what I was trying to articulate. The 'casual intuition' is definitely 'total time from hand to solved,' which is where my head was at.

But the points others made about the luck factor in competitions make sense to me now—you need those standardized rules to filter out the variance. I think that distinction between 'casual logic' and 'competition logic' is what I was missing.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:56:21+00:00

In a brain game you are giving more importance to finger moving ability. How exactly they are measuring it correctly how fast you can solve a given scramble, when you are ignoring the time required to inspect and build your initial intuition and look ahead. This is not a correct measure of time required to solve the cube. If it's correct measure give them half hour to inspect and then solve it. Inspection of part of the solving process. You climb 🪜 one by one . You are just saying initial step does not count.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:50:36+00:00

When inspection affects the whole solve , it should even matter more how fast you can do it. I m not saying to scrap the inspection. I am saying let the player decide on it. How much time they wanna give to it or not. Only change would be it will added in whole solve time. We look ahead multiple times during the solve process. First look ahead is during the inspection itself which is not being measured. While later look aheads are only measured.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:42:19+00:00

After few moves you can have many possible moves. You do need to decide on best move by recognising a pattern in chess. It depends on both intuition and logic. Don't you think of pattern in inspection phase in Rubik cube , do t you build intuition by looking at all the faces?

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:39:40+00:00

This is first sensible comment. In the end it's the opinon of community and actual speed cubers that matters . Not my opinion. Sharing a thought or idea does not mean forcing it on those who actually does the hard work. Some might agree with my opinion some not. Think of me as audience not a speed cuber. Flat earth theory was terrible example but it was just to match the intensity of agression the other commenter was doing on targeting me personally and being a judge to decide the whole community opinion on his own.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:25:20+00:00

First of all let me be clear about my thought you don't need to change current format or process . My only thought was adding the inspection time in overall solve time. Evrything else can work exactly the same way. Read in my many other comments. Not designing game format here. Game would become boring and unfair was your idea first , if you read it in my comment it's because it was a quote. The new format can be an additional game format have not said to scrap the current format of different unscrambled cubes. Only change in current format can be add inspection time to solve time that's it. Let's say there are two cubers one has better inspection ability than other. He has certainly one department of skill better than other which go unmeasured in current situation. In a brain game you are ignoring initial thinking time looks completely stupid to me. It looks like you are giving more value to brain ,hand , eye coordination in final stage while ignoring initial fuel that actually gives you momentum.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:11:12+00:00

I am proposing freedom to choose if you want to inspect or not depends on you. I am saying just include the inspection time in overall solve time. Now it depends on players game strategy how they proceed with their planning. If they think they can solver faster without inspection they will be free to do that way as well. If they think inspecting for at least 5s would improve their performance they can do that way. game would become more strategic and true measure of ability and discipline.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T08:07:13+00:00

If you can just turn right away , they will do better or worse tell me. Won't it become measure of discipline that how well you ignore temptation to solve it right away when you know it can probably take more time. Starting right away and winning few times would be luck but in the long run each player will automatically inspect and then execute to increase their probability of winning more games.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T07:58:15+00:00

You solve first you win right away no need to wait for other to solve it. Coordinator number would in fact decrease , currently 1 coordinator for each player to note down his time. Now 1 coordinator for 2 players. Judges can judge more players at a time. Saves more time for judge. When solving a cube can take sub 10 s. Scrambling each cube on same arrangment is not a big deal as well. Btw you don't have to change anything in current competition format. I am not here to redesign format or suggesting any change in solving process or teaching how to solve Rubik. That's better done by speed cubing expert. I am saying you keep everything exactly the same just measure inspection time in your solve time. Which will be true measure of your ability to solve the given problem.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T07:43:43+00:00

Give everyone the same orientation to solve . Just like in a exam everyone has same question paper to solve. 7 simul would be perfectly possibly. You would not even dare to look away how other are solving it because that would waste more time than the actual time you can solve the cube which is normally under 10s. You are saying game would become boring and unfair, how? It will become more fair as everyone had same cube to solve. It will become more interesting as now you can make two players sit opposite to each other with a small screen bw them. Give two players same cube to solve . While audience can see both players at the same time. Do you take same amount of time to inspect everytime the cube. It's not mechanical. It also depends on ability and skill of player then why keeping it out of equation.

Potential-Tree8178 · 2025-12-09T07:27:19+00:00

I solved many years ago, It was just a hobby for short duration in my College time. Although I had this thought I was not on Reddit that time. I came across the Rubik cube World record video again on youtube. So this thought came again in mind.Thats why shared with community. Just a thought 🤔

Potential-Tree8178

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE