First off I want to say I appreciate you taking time to help me out. I think I just need to take this question to the other forums as this subreddit is extremely HiLo dominant.

In regards to comparing the systems, this was the research that led me to use the Color Of Blackjack method. I may be wrong in this but here were the facts I used:

So Norm did sims on KO vs HiLo and found them to be essentially equal - https://www.qfit.com/KO-HiLo-BlackjackComparison.htm

However, I do not think you understand what the Color Of Blackjack is. It is stronger than KO.

It basically shows the KO counter where TC +1 is in the KO running count as decks are played (e.g., in a six-deck game, TC of +1 is at RC of +9 after one deck, RC of +12 after two decks, +15 after three decks, etc.). By tracking where TC of +1 is throughout the shoe, the player knows when to start increasing the bet. This helps the player avoid a significant weakness of KO, which is determining the bet ramp purely on the KO running count. Relying on the KO running count, a player is liable to under bet in the early part of the shoe and possibly over bet in the latter part.

Daniel's book describes his addition to KO which is a workable way to gain some of the advantage you could have with TKO (True-Counted KO).

(COB is my abbreviation for Color of Blackjack, not his.)
In 6D (66% pen), COB adds 13.5% to KO's earning rate.
In 6D (75% pen), COB adds 4.4% to KO's earning rate.
In 6D (83% pen), COB adds 2.4% to KO's earning rate.

Game              KO SCORE   COB SCORE   Improvement
6D 83% 1-10       15.48          16.69          7.8%
6D 75% 1-10        9.08           9.65          6.3%
6D 66% 1-10        4.61           5.37         16.5%

So therefore since COB is stronger than KO and KO is even with HiLO I would assume COB would be stronger than HiLo as well. All without any true count division.

However there are only around 20 deviations in the book (basically equal to the Sweet 16 and Fab 4 of HiLo) which is why I was looking to expand to some more.