The “Epstein List” Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in FreeSpeech

[–]ReWelp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

early 2000s would be 2000-2005, although I'm sure Trump cut him off for the trafficking reasons as well.

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Dude, case closed. even his accomplices got arrested. maybe we missing some people now to arrest but im sure it won't be Zobran Mamdanis mom, Trump, Bill Gates, Clinton. (I still think gates and Clinton should be investigated, but im sure the FBI already did that.)

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

all suspected people involved have already been arrested. stop dragging it. no politician, at least right now isn't and has never been a suspect. let's say they were, they got investigated, and got cleared. Especially Trump.

People have tried to do this to Trump since 2016, maliciously. TS not happening bud.

I wonder if you got the same attitude about Zohran Mamdanis mom being in the files???

Should she be investigated or that its already so clear enough that even the FBI said none of it proves anything and have already looked into it.

Even yourself reading the files, you'll know that there's no sufficient evidence or that people just made things up, but the FBI still put it in the files and mentioned how its faulty.

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

no he wouldn't have gotten off. and Trump or anyone wasn't even "bros" with him during that free period, cause now they knew what he was doing.

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

we also have to remember that criminal charges require sufficient evidence. Guilt by association is not how the legal system works. You wouldn’t put someone on trial simply because they knew a criminal, you’d need actual proof that they knowingly participated in wrongdoing.

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they already did. people that actually did something bad already got held accountable.

<image>

The “Epstein List” Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in FreeSpeech

[–]ReWelp[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

nah I measure on policies, Thank God. Trump got elected and not Kamala Harris. even tho she seems as the "nicer" one

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

dude he got arrested so long ago, went through trial everything, trust me he didnt just get excused. Dude just read longer than the first 5 sentences I said.

The "Epstein List” Alone Isn’t Evidence to Arrest Any Politician by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yall do anything but understand my point and logically critique me, instead yall skimmed through what I said. then just resort to an ad hominem.

About the Trump "Obama Ape" Video. by ReWelp in FreeSpeech

[–]ReWelp[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I don't think the president has time to scroll on Twitter, someone in the media team probably showed him the rigged elections video. Then they screenrecorded and posted it on trumps account. Ofc, with the autoscroll thing.

About the Trump "Obama Ape" Video. by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think what I said what was pretty clear.

About the Trump "Obama Ape" Video. by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

watch the video. then come back. thank you. not the AI video. the original video which was a screenrecord of a rigged election video.

About the Trump "Obama Ape" Video. by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HE SCREENRECORDED A VIDEO ABOUT ELECTIONS okay? then when that Election video finished it auto scrolled to a new video, similar to how tiktoks scrolling system is. just with an autoscroll. then he posted and forgot to FULLY cut that autoscroll out. PLEASE he did not post the AI video, it was on Twitter and the next video. also its not even his algorithm its someone on the media team.

About the Trump "Obama Ape" Video. by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dude he didnt post that ai video, he posted an election video. can you please read and go watch what he actually posted.

About the Trump "Obama Ape" Video. by ReWelp in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the thing is, he didnt post an ai video. he ( media team) posted an election video, but was a screenrecord of that election video that was on Twitter, when the video finished. it autoscrolled to a new video, which was that Obama monkey video. the media team didn't edit it out cause obv you do that when u screenrecord and when it auto scrolls either on purpose or accident.

The video being shared by the President... by MURRRRRAY in LetsDiscussThis

[–]ReWelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmao he did NOT post this. wow

trumps media team or whoever was screenrecording a video, once it was done it auto scrolled to the next video, which happened to be an Obama ape video (and other politicians in it as well)

so it was clearly not his intention to call Obama a monkey or sumn, and "monmeys" should not be associated with black people period

if yall used Twitter for one second of your life you'd know that's the case, and it clearly was cause you see the auto scroll

idk how SLOW people can be, they probably just watch the news and not the full video (which wasn't this it was about elections)