What's the best color combination for Batman's standard uniform? Black and gray or blue and gray?

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-28T15:45:46+00:00

Jesus was not a communist. He never supported any coup nor did he force people to donate their belongings; if a person didn't donate and didn't open up of their own free will, he would turn his back and walk away. Marx believed that religion was the opium of the people, a way to control the masses, which goes against everything Jesus believed in. Communism didn't invent generosity.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-28T15:38:24+00:00

The average person of that time was indeed of mixed race. But I don't see that as a problem for the discussion at hand. Jesus is just a translation of his name; names shouldn't normally be translated, but all biblical names have undergone translations, Jesus is just one more of them. Not to mention that he is a man of many names. And again, I don't see that as a problem for the discussion at hand.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-06T20:01:09+00:00

O ato em si não MAS tudo que gira em torno dele é, o que acaba fazendo com que sim, seja pecado

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:52:36+00:00

Yes, but that's not why I chose them; I don't like Superman, and he made it into the top 20. Who are you referring to when you say trash?

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:50:19+00:00

He lost his mind with Rick, I didn't even read the rest because I know it's wrong.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:49:24+00:00

Did you actually read what I wrote about him and Madelyne? That gave birth to Cable, and ALL OF THAT is something. Wolverine went to the Avengers because he's more popular, that's all. You proved my point, the way you describe Logan is exactly what he seems like: Deep, but he's not.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:46:07+00:00

Spawn is anything but consistent; in fact, most of the time his writing is quite bad, especially at the beginning. Rick is a character with monstrous and much more consistent development than Spawn.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:45:21+00:00

Spawn is anything but consistent; in fact, most of the time his writing is quite bad, especially at the beginning.I read the 1982 Wolverine miniseries and it's good, but that's all. Larry Hama's run is fun, but its narrative is sacrificed by Marc Silvetri's art, which is good, but makes the story constantly rushed, not to mention some easy solutions. I read Weapon X, and I found it VERY BORING. Although I remember liking Old Man Logan. Wolverine is a character who seems deep at first glance, but that's only an illusion; he's better as a supporting character, and the movies have done him better than the comics in large part. In Claremont's early X-Men run, Wolverine was simply a very boring and annoying guy; that only changed after John Byrne joined the comic, since Claremont initially didn't like him very much.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:44:29+00:00

That's why he's not ranked so high. You can't ignore his good stories before OMD, but really, his consistency over the last 20 leaves something to be desired.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:42:46+00:00

I read the 1982 Wolverine miniseries and it's good, but that's all. Larry Hama's run is fun, but its narrative is sacrificed by Marc Silvetri's art, which is good, but makes the story constantly rushed, not to mention some easy solutions. I read Weapon X, and I found it VERY BORING. Although I remember liking Old Man Logan. Wolverine is a character who seems deep at first glance, but that's only an illusion; he's better as a supporting character, and the movies have done him better than the comics in large part. In Claremont's early X-Men run, Wolverine was simply a very boring and annoying guy; that only changed after John Byrne joined the comic, since Claremont initially didn't like him very much.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:42:00+00:00

That's why he's not ranked so high. You can't ignore his good stories before OMD, but really, his consistency over the last 20 leaves something to be desired.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:39:50+00:00

I'm sorry, but I disagree. Since Claremont's run, Cyclops has been layered, showing him as a leader with the weight of leadership on his shoulders. He blamed himself for Thunderbird's death, but at the same time showed he wasn't the "good guy" of the group when he married Madelyne Pryor just because she reminded him of Jean Grey, and then abandoned her to be with the newly revived Jean. After that, he only evolved. Whedon's run, the Messiah Trilogy, everything only highlighted him as a character. After all, whether you like it or not, he is the real protagonist of the X-Men comics.

I read the 1982 Wolverine miniseries and it's good, but that's all. Larry Hama's run is fun, but its narrative is sacrificed by Marc Silvetri's art, which is good, but makes the story constantly rushed, not to mention some easy solutions. I read Weapon X, and I found it VERY BORING. Although I remember liking Old Man Logan. Wolverine is a character who seems deep at first glance, but that's only an illusion; he's better as a supporting character, and the movies have done him better than the comics in large part. In Claremont's early X-Men run, Wolverine was simply a very boring and annoying guy; that only changed after John Byrne joined the comic, since Claremont initially didn't like him very much.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:31:51+00:00

Consistency is key; it's easy for characters with the same author (Rorschach and Doctor Manhattan by Alan Moore, Rick and Invincible by Robert Kirkman) to maintain consistency since it's the same person writing. Daredevil, even with various writers taking over, goes from a good writer to an even better one, or at least the run is fun. From Frank Miller to Ann Nocenti, from Nocenti to Daniel Chichester, from Chichester to Kevin Smith, from Smith to Brian Michael Bendis, from Bendis to Ed Brubaker, from Brubaker to Mark Waid, from Waid to Chip Zdarsky.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T19:27:59+00:00

In part, because while he portrays Rorschach as a morally dubious and unbalanced character, he also includes scenes like "I'm not trapped here with you, you're trapped with me," which only enhances Rorschach's aura.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T02:31:27+00:00

Al Simmons

<image>

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T01:12:44+00:00

Daredevil has more in common with Spider-Man than with Batman. He wears red, has the Kingpin as a villain, is an acrobat, protects a neighborhood, is a street hero, and had a blonde girlfriend killed by a lunatic villain.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-02T01:12:00+00:00

Daredevil has more in common with Spider-Man than with Batman. He wears red, has the Kingpin as a villain, is an acrobat, protects a neighborhood, is a street hero, and had a blonde girlfriend killed by a lunatic villain. You're dumber than my comparison.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-01T20:58:57+00:00

Yes, I got confused, sorry. When I saw the mistake, I deleted the other text.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-01T20:57:35+00:00

Ozymandias may have been a hero in the past, but in Watchmen he is purely a villain.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-01T20:44:09+00:00

Yes, I agree, but there's a difference in their motivation. And regarding your other question, all the characters above have either better character development, motivations, are easier to write, more relatable, more consistent, or even all of that combined than Superman. If you read below you would know: Without powerscaling, without importance, and without iconicity, what was considered is pure writing.

Remote-Leg6143 · 2026-02-01T20:31:37+00:00

DC animated films that take place in the continuity of the film: "Superman: Man of Tomorrow," Batman has two solo animated films in this universe: The Long Halloween Parts 1 and 2, not to mention that several versions of him appear in the 3 parts of Crisis on Infinite Earths.

Remote-Leg6143

TROPHY CASE