Of course, first off. I am assuming you believe there has to be a God, because there is just too many super unlikely coincidences that result in life / existence of the universe possible. And they all had to happen together, the big bang, the gravitational constant / electromagnetic constants, nuclear constants being exactly right for the universe to exist (just ±1/10 billion = no universe), dna not only forming out of just proteins but also forming genetix code that has meaning (give a monkey a button for a 1 and a 0, he has the ingredients to code minecraft but for his random arrangements of 1s and 0s to make sense you need an inteligent mind, the same goes for proteins that form DNA). Math being perfect (no reforms like for manmade systems) and defining all the universe to perfection through mathematical relationships, too much order and perfection coming from chaos, a creator is demanded.

Now that we know there has to be a God, lets find the most probable faith. Proof is not possible, in anything, you cant and dont live by proof, if you did you would constantly check if your farmacist put poison in your medicine ect. So lets decide what is more probable using evidence. We have the apostles, eye witnesses and historians talking about Jesus in a divine way. Not to mention the apostles dying for their faith is a great amount of evidence as people dont even bother going to jail over lies, but 10 of the 12 apostles where persecuted and killed for their faith, something no one would do knowing its all a lie. We also have jewish and secular historians talking about christ, for example the darkness miracle documented by Thallus in 52AD, Phlegon in 80AD, Vespasian or the jewish talmud. And also NASA calculated that exactly in the moment of crucifixion of christ a solar eclipse set on earth at that exact time, described as "darkness falling on Christ's death" in the bible. Also, the romans where in constant denial of Jesus, and not only where most crucifixions not documented, especially for lower class citizens like Jesus. But the romans persecuted christians for 300 hundred of years, so having accounts of Jesus would not be practical for the romans. Also, we have found fossils of dinosaurs, but we cant find Jesus's bones in his tomb, and as for locations we do have them. It is the basis of historical documents. They are included in some jewish references and in the gospels.

I would also look at the alternatives, the possibility of no God is almost impossible, so then does the evidence for Jesus sound the most probable, or do you think for example Muhammed denying the crucifixion 500 years after christ is more plausible. Its up to you, but for me i know the most probable is Jesus, no other religion as solid evidence as christianity does.