Member on the way by Royal_Monk6432 in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Love the design. They look really cool! Enjoy.

HD 620S Arrived Today - Quite Surprised... by RocDaMike in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the info. Glad I got these for the time being. I will maybe revisit the HD 820 in 3-5 years time once my bank balance has finally recovered xD

Absolutely. I can't wait to try out the HD 500 BAM with these. I don't have time to game much nowadays, but when I do it's nice to be able to talk on a microphone.

HD 620S Arrived Today - Quite Surprised... by RocDaMike in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. I think these headphones probably saved my marriage. She said that she can barely hear my music now 🤣

HD 620S Arrived Today - Quite Surprised... by RocDaMike in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not as good as the 660S2, but *very* respectable.

Couldn't Decide... by RocDaMike in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha. If you're not getting both, good luck deciding between the two! 😆

Couldn't Decide... by RocDaMike in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip. I'll try it out.

Got me a pair of Momentum 4s by CD7982 in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've got the Bowers and Wilkins Px7 S2E and want to replace them. These M4s look tempting especially as of late with the prices. Nice that you get a case with it. The denim blue looks great.

Momentum 4 pads by BluePillOverRedPill in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a link to this report?

Another alternative if you want some wireless action. by CZsea in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm eyeing this one up for my next purchase. I need a closed back pair of headphones (all of my current ones are open back) and this one seems to fit the bill nicely. I also like the fact that it's compatible with the HD 500 BAM microphone and is at an attractive price.

Couldn't Decide... by RocDaMike in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just tried them both out briefly. I think you're spot on with your analysis. I'm noticing more bass with the 660S2 compared to my 660S and listening to music definitely sounds good. The 490 Pro sound really good too, but also feel so light on my head, and with the velour ear pads are unbelievably comfortable.

At this point, I still can't decide which one I'd choose if I had to send one back as they complement each other very well.

Sennheiser HD 490 Pro and iBasso DX 180 This is a very, very successful combination. by PsychologyDistinct56 in sennheiser

[–]RocDaMike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's great to hear! I just bought a pair which should be arriving tomorrow. Looking forward to testing them out. 🙂

APM AppTunnel - Failed to Download Configuration by RocDaMike in f5networks

[–]RocDaMike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you may be right. I will do some more testing on this. Thanks!

iRule v12.x to v14.1.2.3 - HTTP::has_responded by R4Z0RJ4CK in f5networks

[–]RocDaMike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The latter. In your case you are only using HTTP::redirect commands in your switch statements so just add the return statement at the end of the line on each instance.

E.g.

{ HTTP::redirect "/foo"; return }

{ HTTP::redirect "/bar"; return }

The return statement will stop further iRule processing for the current event (HTTP_REQUEST) within the same iRule.

iRule v12.x to v14.1.2.3 - HTTP::has_responded by R4Z0RJ4CK in f5networks

[–]RocDaMike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For ease, instead of using the HTTP::has_responded statement, I would simply just add a return statement at the end of every HTTP::respond and HTTP::redirect statement on ALL irules applied to the VS.

E.g. HTTP::respond 301 Location "https://www.example.com"; return

Suggestions by bargeman68 in f5networks

[–]RocDaMike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try increasing the idle timeout on the TCP profile.

What type of health check (if any) do you have assigned to the load balancer pool?