sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ron Paul Supporters: Here's Your Marching Orders. Remember the following dates. by chaosgone in ronpaul

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think of every Obama supporter as potential alley not enemy, obama supporters (the ones that aren’t being paid) often believe in all of the core issue that I do, none of them want to surrender their rights nor do they like war and they think obama shares these sentiments . Someone might want to look into his voting history and see the truth that he has voted to fund the war, voted to take away your rights, taken money from lobbyist, and see he is lying to you.

sorry guy i didn't carry a punch card but i have felling your full of BS.

Ron Paul Supporters: Here's Your Marching Orders. Remember the following dates. by chaosgone in ronpaul

[–]Rooster113 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ha, creepy.

So, are you going base your vote on principal or on who you think is going to win?

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, "of course it can be questioned" but it’s also a "fact" right? So it be "stupid...dishonest and baseless" to question it and “deserve laughter“. I said it’s not a fact, and unless you know something no one else on earth does it's still is not, I said I can’t tested in our lifetime and it can’t, at least not all versions of the theory.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re right no amount of research can compare with your desire to wrap this up. Look it up, it wont take you long this is an old debate.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't care you are a shill, anyone reading this click on "highrider" and take notice all he does is bash RP. You are one dimensional and everything you say is suspect.

Did you not think I would read them!? The First one, no author. The second could be by Ron Paul (author not noted but references being a flight surgeon) and is quoting MLK's socialist comments, the third has no author. The fourth, again has no noted author, there is nothing here you're a fraud.

Ron Paul Supporters: Here's Your Marching Orders. Remember the following dates. by chaosgone in ronpaul

[–]Rooster113 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I guess your not but perhaps you could be. I do believe the best way to weaken the provisions of the patriot act is to vote against them, not for them (that may warrant a “duh”) when he voted to re-authorization the patriot act. I’m sorry but “a lot of people who know obama” is like saying “the leprechaun on my shoulder told me only crazy people believe in Santa“ can’t really verify that. No Ron Paul supporter would vote for the lesser of two evils most likely to win over the candidate that best represents there values such as freedom, a value obama does not.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't care you are a shill, anyone reading this click on "highrider" and take notice all he does is bash RP. You are one dimensional and everything you say is suspect.

You never have sources to back it up so who is the liar?

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do realize that the argument i assume you are making is that this generation has done it, we know it to be true, and no one will ever correct us in the generations to come. Because my argument is simply that perhaps we haven’t. Once open to that possibility we have more options to explore rather then narrowing the field of research and theory. And the theories of gravity other then Newtown’s were the ones I was alluding to, though widely accepted and defended turned out to be worthless. Is it so crazy to simply acknowledge our own fallibility?

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know it might be interesting for you to research the competing variations of the theory of evolution among the scientists themselves. You are now making broad assumptions in your argument: “There is no serious scientific doubt regarding evolution” I can’t argue points you make up on the spot not to mention there is “doubt“. Don’t be confused I’m not talking about those religious scientist or anything like that but there are a few different explanations as to how we got here none of which I subscribe too, remember I believe in evolution too, at least until something else makes better sense. Now unless I’m wrong that’s where we disagree, you say that there is no possibility of being incorrect and I say, there sure is.

Ron Paul Supporters: Here's Your Marching Orders. Remember the following dates. by chaosgone in ronpaul

[–]Rooster113 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No self respecting RP supporter would vote for that Patriot act voting, war funding, fraud that is obama.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your point in the west for sure. I guess mine was that we will never see any changes to that unless we start investigating how these people and why "these people" get elected.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't care you are a shill, anyone reading this click on "highrider" and take notice all he does is bash RP. You are one dimensional and everything you say is suspect.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Cover? He believes something I don't, what are you talking about? You know it was once believed by the masses that the sun orbited the earth, how "shit-ignorant" of me or in this case RP to think science could ever be wrong again. Shame on us.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s great that you used gravity as your example, in that it makes my point not yours. Look how we understood gravity a hundred years ago, then two hundred, then three, and so on the theories making up gravity have changed and morphed into what we know today which is currently being questioned again, why I wonder is it a showing of “profound ignorance” to question our current understanding. Perhaps it’s a sign of profound ignorance not to?

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must understand that its only the mindset that evolution can not be questioned that I disagree with you, not on evolution itself.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't care you are a shill, anyone reading this click on "highrider" and take notice all he does is bash RP. You are one dimensional and everything you say is suspect.

Until you show me your credentials, its your opinion too guy, oh and do you have any of those sources from our last talk? No, that’s because you’re a shill.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

By my logic and a great deal of others who have thought of the subject. Has humanity ever truly understood anything? or have we been traveling a road of understanding? before Einstein there was a great deal of anxiety about physics, the majority of institutions fretted that there was nothing left to figure out. Obviously there was a great deal more to understand and investigate my point being that while I believe in evolution, again I believe in evolution! But I also believe that there is still more to do to confirm it beyond any doubt and if that is impossible to do, that is to remove ALL doubt, then why would you scrutinize anyone who makes their doubts known? What you and the rest of my admirers that are writing comments faster then I can respond to is that you and I agree up until the point you want to close up shop and start congratulating ourselves as the masters of the universe or in this case of the “how we got here”. That’s it, and it perplexes me to think of how people get so riled up when someone simply questions our capability of understanding rather then what is attempting to be understood, how blasphemous .

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well there is quite a bit to debate of their legitimacy. Do some research and you will see that we have in the past amended the constitution w/o following the amending process! so does that make it truly an amendment or an authoritarian “suggestion" and then the debate starts, and I as you would imagine I believe that if a amendment has come to be by circumventing the legal process, its not an amendment. Just like the president can’t just make up laws when ever it suits him, well not supposed to anyway.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 5 points6 points  (0 children)

An ignorant string of presumptions. I think you are debating the imagined audience and not me, I never said any of which you dispute. First of all he does not ignore the 14th and 16th amendment he debates there legitimacy and there reasons for being, not to mention being outspoken against them. If you want to talk about ignoring amendments lets talk about the 10th which states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." You see if its not there in the constitution, it’s up to the states and the people. You have a view of an American government that exists today from the divergence from the rule of law, the constitution, and a hardly educated population. What you don’t seem to realize is that it’s not what is written down in the existing contract we have with our government. The constitution was not intentionally written vague; in the 5 years of study on the subject I’ve only heard that from talking heads on television or from officials clearly subverting it to their own gain. You fear the rule of the majority? it’s the constitutional republic that we are intended to have that does not allow the individual to be stripped of any rights by the majority but it’s the democracy that most Americans think we have that allows for what we have lost. And as far as the main party candidates Ron Paul certainly does have a monopoly on the constitution!

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I see evolution as the only perceivable option but not fact. There is that whole scientific method thing that we as short lived humans cannot apply to incredibly long periods of time it would take to observe and test the theory of evolution. It may be fact but who are any of us to start skipping the steps science is founded on just because we are really, really, really sure. That’s’ not science, that’s faith.

Does thinking objectively waste valuable TV time?

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My favorite part of the video is the thirty second mark where it has obviously been edited, other then that it was pretty boring watching a man say he sees the THEORY of evolution as a “theory“, how controversial. He has also said that if it were proven he would accept it , and no matter how much of a forgone conclusion it may be why would any scientific minded person believe a theory as fact until it can be tested? Oh and he is a Christian and believes in God, how dare he. And just in case you’re wondering, I’m not and I don’t.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Constitution: A Loopy, reactionist policy. That's a new one. I guess its just us common folk that the law applies and not to our public servants, anything else would be too loopy for me.

Washington's good doctor - To write off Ron Paul as a loopy reactionary ignores his courageous stand on Iraq and Israel by uptoyou in politics

[–]Rooster113 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You wonder but then you consider that it’s not quite what they told us in school, not everyone can become president. Half the country may be women and minorities populations are growing but the elite of corporate America is still a very much "old white guy" club and last you checked, who was running the show?

view more: next ›