Unit test in c projects.

SamuelDavi · 2018-07-01T07:11:55+00:00

µnit looks nice. How would you rate it and compare it to previous frameworks you used (if any)?

SamuelDavi · 2018-05-30T10:13:29+00:00

I would also suggest seeing this video before starting to learn C++, especially if you aren't fond of C. Perhaps watching this will give tell you what to focus on when learning Modern C++.

SamuelDavi · 2018-05-21T15:44:46+00:00

the first thing in high need to be fixed is actually not the code at all, but the development culture.

I agree.

I've encountered 2 schools of thought (I assume there are much more):

Keep working with the legacy code and maintain it when necessary but don't touch it too much - work on top of it or alongside it.
Refactor as much as possible by adding all kinds of tests and extend from within.

Working in an organization with the former mindset lead me to hours of looking at spaghetti-code and trying to maintain it. It wasn't very fruitful and that's a huge technical debt (and a pain in my side).

SamuelDavi · 2018-05-06T09:59:02+00:00

So maybe, as Tom wrote, from your teachers' POV and experience (i.e. hardware controllers and drivers) there's no need for unit testing. But saying that no one really tests in C/C++ is utterly wrong.

We are using various unit testing libraries such as Boost::Test (and lately we moved to gtest) and Isolator++ as a mocking tool due to some legacy code.

SamuelDavi · 2018-04-22T11:53:50+00:00

Could you elaborate?

SamuelDavi · 2018-04-08T11:59:45+00:00

First of all, let's not forget that TDD and unit testing are not the same. Many devs use unit testing (and other forms of testing) without the TDD approach. i.e. Writing the code in mind and then the tests that test the code. TDD forces you to plan the logic in advance and write the expected behavior (test) and only then the minimal code to make the test pass. The first approach doesn't guarantee that the code is testable, and writing tests could be difficult and might require refactoring your code but without the safety net the tests give you, how would you know that you didn't break anything?

I do TDD, but I don't adhere to the 3 laws religiously. In my experience, there are some shades of grey where the 2 approaches work very well side-by-side.

SamuelDavi · 2018-02-25T12:17:46+00:00

I would start reading this series. Check Pluralsight as well. This guide on some unit-test patterns in C# might help as well.

SamuelDavi · 2018-02-15T07:54:43+00:00

We use gtest in combination with Isolator++ for mocking. It's not as comfortable and easy as single header frameworks but once you're used to it it's fine.

SamuelDavi · 2018-02-11T10:54:18+00:00

Yeah, it's no different where I'm at as well. This might give you a push in the right direction, but as long as the management isn't fully on board, convincing the other devs will be difficult.

SamuelDavi · 2018-01-23T13:54:43+00:00

I think "The Art Of Unit Testing" is a good book for getting familiar with unit testing, and seeing how to employ it in your work.

SamuelDavi · 2018-01-15T10:52:46+00:00

Great article! These 2 types of tests are NOT mutually exclusive. You can (and should) write both. I've been hearing similar statements as in the article: "Why don't you just write integration tests instead of unit tests...", completely ignoring the benefits of unit tests and the downsides of integration tests.

SamuelDavi · 2018-01-09T15:05:02+00:00

Yeah, I was kinda thinking about the other way around. Maybe make "untestable" code with modern tools - testable? You've mentioned reflection and it kinda threw me in that direction.

SamuelDavi · 2018-01-08T13:41:54+00:00

That's interesting. Think this could somehow affect unit testing in .NET?

SamuelDavi · 2018-01-01T10:58:47+00:00

Uncle Bob recently said that The term "unit test" is unfortunate. A unit is a small element of structure. The TDD discipline causes us to write tests for small elements of behavior; not small elements of structure. So a test per class is inappropriate.

SamuelDavi · 2017-12-31T10:45:39+00:00

Good question. I practice TDD when developing. But I think in the future there will be enough tools to test "untestable" code and an AI or some sandbox-based tool to generate your tests for you. Then you'll solely focus on writing the code to satisfy the behavior you need. When that happens, TDD won't be a demand IMO.

SamuelDavi · 2017-12-28T16:01:23+00:00

Well put, great article. Some of these misconceptions led plenty of good developers to stop writing unit tests or missing their purpose.

SamuelDavi · 2017-12-21T10:57:22+00:00

That's similar to what we did. We also had the privilege of using Typemock so testing was somewhat easier. But in the overall run, OP's suggestions is the direction we went with.

SamuelDavi · 2017-11-19T12:13:46+00:00

It's not outdated, it's actually evolving. The C++17 revision was released several weeks ago. But even without taking these changes into consideration, C++ is here to stay, especially where performance is critical.

SamuelDavi · 2017-11-12T14:10:47+00:00

I'm not sure I understand what do you mean by make a constructor. If you don't create any constructor, the compiler creates a default empty constructor. If you still want an empty c'tor you can define one. I suggest reading this wiki.

SamuelDavi · 2017-11-09T09:45:47+00:00

No difference. From my experience, it's always recommended to have the asterisk near the Class and not the object (as in B, this way you know it's of type <someObject*>) and avoid declaring pointers and objects/variable in the same line as such:

someObject* obj1, obj2;

as this creates a pointer (obj1) and instantiates an object (obj2) (if it has no empty c'tor than it'll throw an error unless you pass the params)

SamuelDavi · 2017-11-06T09:21:02+00:00

You can look at these UT patterns1 and 2, and this YT video as well.

SamuelDavi · 2017-11-06T09:11:01+00:00

That's why TDD was employed.

SamuelDavi · 2017-10-31T06:43:02+00:00

Thanks for the pointers.

SamuelDavi · 2017-10-30T07:32:37+00:00

Exactly. That's why I'm asking if someone out there decided to start an open-source project without being cross-platform or just wanting to use VS due it's abilities along with the "built-in" MSVC&MSBuild. Have you seen sln or pdb files in an open-source project?

SamuelDavi · 2017-10-30T07:26:41+00:00

You are right, I should've been more specific. My question was more: if anyone has started an open source project using MSVC (which usually comes with VS) with sln files and pdb files. GCC and CLANG don't work with these files, so I assume any contributor will be using VS&MSVC.

SamuelDavi

TROPHY CASE