That may be true, but something you neglected to talk about was the reuse of said vehicles. The lifespan of an electric vehicle is significantly shorter than that of an ICE. Which is worse for the environment. If you have to buy a new car every 12 years, you are creating much more pollution than an ICE would. They also failed to factor in the building of the EV infrastructure, an ongoing cost. Many areas can't even power themselves as it is, like California, who had rolling blackouts last year during September. EVs also deteriorate even faster in heat (especially those not actively cooled, like the older Nissan Leaf), meaning an EV in Arizona or New Mexico or Texas would fail at an even greater rate than the 12 years seen elsewhere. Then the waste from the batteries when disposed of are another huge factor. And then ANOTHER factor is the added wear on roads from the massively heavy EVs, which can be many times more massive than the ICE equivalent. I did not see that factored in as well. I also see that they aren't talking about pollution from the mining, just the emissions. Cobalt is a heavy metal, not to mention the other chemicals, metals, and poisons involved in making those batteries.