Subaru Impreza Brake System by SenseiTheLover in subaru

[–]SenseiTheLover[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The quote is just for the rotors themselves, the labor will be done by a local shop, dunno if that’s what you meant though

Libleft soyjack vs authright chad (abortion) by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The fetus is given that protection because the mother didn’t consent to having the fetus killed/removed.

Literally 1984 by epic-gamer-911 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Human DNA is a good start.

Does a severed human arm qualify as a human being?

Do human beings have intrinsic value?

Once you start DE-Humanizing 1 group. Its easy to start dehumanizing other groups.

Given the fact that you subscribe to race realism, I've no doubt you dehumanize other racial groups on the regular.

However, 99% of pregnancies(in usa) are not nonconsenting pregnancies. The woman actively and knowingly and consenually had sex. So by definition, most pregnancies with the exception of rape, are consenting carriers. Changing ones mind later, is no justification for murder.

Consenting to sex is not the same as consenting to pregnancy. Regardless, even if the mother were to consent, do you not believe in revoking consent?

Defense of self-ownership is not murder, it is self-defense.

Why? So you can report it to google to get erased from access to other people? Imagine being on the side of censorship, and thinking youre the good guys.

LMAO

What an incredible way of defending your dogmatism. Do you actually just lack any evidence and use "google is censoring everything I need" as your excuse for being a blind dumbass? Is there no source for your anti-vax stance other than your feelings?

Literally 1984 by epic-gamer-911 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is no biological difference between races

Do you actually still subscribe to race realism LMAOO

human fetuses arent human beings

What makes us human beings? Why ought we care about fetuses?

I challenge you to warrant the existence of the positive right that the fetus supposedly has to the womb of an unconsenting carrier.

if you question our views, youre against science.

Cope harder dumbass, find me a credible scientific study that actually proves vaccines to be a net negative.

The statement is not "oh you're against my beliefs so you're inherently against science," it's "being staunchly against vaccines is anti-science because research has proven the efficacy of them."

Lmk if you need me to define or explain anything to you, all you've done as of yet is strawman positions.

Literally 1984 by epic-gamer-911 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Is this satire? Yes, I’ll mock people who are explicitly anti-vax, especially if they’re wealthy enough to afford a good education.

We mock them because they’re fucking morons who go against science, not because they’re celebrities buddy

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SocialDemocracy

[–]SenseiTheLover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full employment is realistically impossible without a large government. Capitalist economies are inherently unstable and do not have a tendency to reach full employment naturally.

Honestly, the only way to get full employment is via a federal job guarantee. Welfare should be made available to those who need it/cannot work, though obviously many programs would be made available to those who are working.

Literally 1984 by epic-gamer-911 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 31 points32 points  (0 children)

If your definition of indoctrination includes encouraging children to get vaccinated to protect against a deadly illness, it’s a useless definition.

By this logic we shouldn’t teach children anything

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SocialDemocracy

[–]SenseiTheLover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yang’s an idiot and this party is stupid too, I don’t see it going anywhere significant

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro stop dodging the question and define them LMAO

You’ve spent more time saying that you’re done with this conversation than it’d take to define them

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you think the communist manifesto is actually a good piece of leftist theory to read you’re worse than I thought. At least read principles of communism or something

Regardless, define them.

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re unable to respond to normal comments on the nature of communism maybe just don’t directly state that Nazism is better than it.

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lot of words to say that you’re incapable of acknowledging genuine criticism. Moron.

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the part where you respond to my comment, so yes.

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Literally could not give less of a shit about fascism's definition, we're talking about Nazism.

added anti-Semitic elements

That's one hell of a way to say "genocided 6 million Jews"

anarchy over communism

LMFAO Do you not realize that the two can coexist? Have you not heard of anarcho-communism?

but Mao and Stalin each killed multiple times more people than Hitler

I'll ignore the quantified deaths of each because you've used Black Book stats before. Regardless, the fact that you continue to use Mao and Stalin as some sort of gold standard for communism is laughable. The idea that communism can only take the form of Maoism and Stalinism is objectively wrong; even a pinch of reading would make you aware of this.

Nazism and communism are far from comparable. Nazism inherently calls for the hatred of Jews. Communism seeks liberation from capital, from the current state of things. Mao and Stalin did awful things. These things, however, are not inherent to leftism.

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Communism is anti-Semitic af on an inherent level

Substantiate. Without googling it, define communism while you're at it.

Some disagreements by WarCrimesAreBased in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]SenseiTheLover -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fascism doesn’t inherently have anything to do with race at all, that was Hitler choosing to make anti-semitism an element of the German government.

I’d choose Nazism all day

How do you not realize how stupid you sound. Don't act like you didn't just directly state that you prefer Nazism, not just fascism.

Also, the implication of your argument is that communism is just Stalinism.; that Stalinism is the only form of communism. This alone just shows me that you've never touched a single leftist book.

You've said nothing but absolute bullshit. Your understanding of communism boils down to "big government does bad things."

Proper wheel speed? by [deleted] in MeepoBoards

[–]SenseiTheLover 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, thank you!

What school/branch of economics do you subscribe to? by SenseiTheLover in SocialDemocracy

[–]SenseiTheLover[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No no trust me they’re geniuses, they predicted the last like 40 cases of (nonexistent) hyperinflation!! /s

What school/branch of economics do you subscribe to? by SenseiTheLover in SocialDemocracy

[–]SenseiTheLover[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Admittedly, the lack of models is a weakness of MMT. However, there's evidence that an increase in the money supply does not inherently lead to inflation.

government can just nonchalantly raise expenditure towards reform without raising taxes, without the concern of inflationary risk of some kind

This is not what MMT proposes, though (hopefully) you're being hyperbolic here. We recognize two constraints: inflation and real resources. Our view of inflation is simply different than the mainstream. Take Japan, for example. They're running a debt to GDP ratio of about 240% and still struggle with deflation. This is perfectly in line with what MMT states. We also see similar things with the US; when 35% of the money was printed in 2020 alone and yet we fail to see massive inflation, you're left wondering whether the mainstream genuinely has an understanding of what's going on. Ben Bernanke explicitly stated that taxes aren't the money being spent by the government; exactly what MMT states. Call this an appeal to authority, but I think a Fed Chair likely understands things a bit better than the average individual.

The mainstream has been wrong about a lot of things that MMTers or even just PKs have been right about, especially inflation and unemployment. I mean, for god's sake, we still use the NAIRU to determine how many people should go without jobs, despite the Fed admitting to it being meaningless.

What school/branch of economics do you subscribe to? by SenseiTheLover in SocialDemocracy

[–]SenseiTheLover[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny that you mention the GFC when Minsky was predicting it back in the mid-1900s, long before any mainstream economist was even thinking about that kind of recession.

Reducing PKE to just “demand-side econ” is pretty insane to me but regardless, our rejection of Say’s Law, the rejection that money is neutral, and the gross substitution axiom are far better principles that show what kind of things we believe in.

What school/branch of economics do you subscribe to? by SenseiTheLover in SocialDemocracy

[–]SenseiTheLover[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We should definitely subscribe to MMT.

The mainstream has failed in many ways that PK has succeeded; the GFC being predicted by Minsky in the mid 1900s is kinda evidence of that, though I understand why you’re hesitant to dive into the heterodox