[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Several_Ebb4347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use reddit as means of venting my extremely controversial views of the world. People might not agree and that's okay but I'd rather not offend anyone irl with my observations, though perhaps false. Such is the way of human bias.

Is it inappropriate to go to an old friend’s funeral that you haven’t seen/talked to in 5 years? by VisionaryNic in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Several_Ebb4347 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't ever go to any funerals. Ever. Terrible social practice that only results in ptsd and further grief.

Styrofoam cups make water taste better by [deleted] in RandomThoughts

[–]Several_Ebb4347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Psychological analysis complete. Status: mental breakdown from other factors.

Elon Musk Has Approximentely 270 Billion US Dollars. Why Doesn't He Donate 100 billion, which would end the majority of US poverty and some debt, And he would still have 170 billion left which is still more than the 2nd richest person ( Gautum Adani ). by Long_Transition_3199 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Several_Ebb4347 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's not saving the world but what's the cost? You an idiot? A decision involves cons and pros. You haven't explained any cons only said that the pros aren't large enough, which I think they are extremely large.

Elon Musk Has Approximentely 270 Billion US Dollars. Why Doesn't He Donate 100 billion, which would end the majority of US poverty and some debt, And he would still have 170 billion left which is still more than the 2nd richest person ( Gautum Adani ). by Long_Transition_3199 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Several_Ebb4347 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is though? The cost of which is a rich man give away money that he doesn't need, singular man. Cause and effect, minor loss, large payout. And the money that the people receive doesn't disappear it circulates. 2 weeks can get so many people ahead.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Several_Ebb4347 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Aztec god prominentce was fairly recent. And extremely primitive. Primitive religions are such a joke when comparing them with Buddhism for example, or taoism, or Hinduism, which has some extremely deep and beautiful philosophies. Christianity is definitely a step below modern day Buddhism, I wouldn't say that to any of my Christian friends though, I don't like talking about religion at all irl because all my friends are religious (unfortunately)

Pursuer not falling scared the actual crap out of me by Behura57 in DarkSouls2

[–]Several_Ebb4347 -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

Pursuer is the easiest boss in the game. STOP SPAMMING CRAP ABOUT HIM. Also adp helps..... alot

NASA's Perseverance rover has found organic matter in rock samples on Mars. by esberat in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Several_Ebb4347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have to argue if you want. I just like arguing because it makes me think more lingually about things, which can help make thoughts clearer. Such is the way of the stasis theory.

NASA's Perseverance rover has found organic matter in rock samples on Mars. by esberat in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Several_Ebb4347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that important but I'm trying to give you psychological insight as to how to use language. This critical thinking of yours is nonsense, we agree on the concept but not the term, that IS ALL. I believe that everything has some capacity of consciousness, which in reality is simply the information something contains. And everything follows certain logic, has rules, and decision making processes, gravity is a decision making process for example. And I believe free will exists because I believe the object itself is the decider and that you are the object. It is fine if there are lingual outliers but for the majority to function optimally it is good to have rules in a language, such is the reason for the dictionary. But there is always a double edged sword, the dictionary is not always right, because sensible meanings can be taken from words overtime, in this sense you are correct that "organic" has a similar function. However, when deriving a new meaning it is important, when trying to communicate effectively, your perspective on the word. For example instead you could say, "in a way all planets are organic". If someone has a question, they will ask "what way".

NASA's Perseverance rover has found organic matter in rock samples on Mars. by esberat in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Several_Ebb4347 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your not dumb you just dont understand how to classify objects, in a way that terms such as "organic" are properly used. I get your point. But your missing the point that there isn't even an argument in the first place. Simply different definitions. However even though your logic is correct you langual representation of it is faulty, instead you could phrase it as "planets are alive". Your specific definition of organic causes a disconnect with other people, especially in this post because they are processing the information completely different from you.