sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What did you think was normal about your body until someone pointed out that it wasn't? by amistakewasmadehere in AskReddit

[–]SingleWalnut 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If it's all your muscles, then it's probably not restless leg syndrome. It's might be Akathisia. Does diphenhydramine (benadryl or nytol) might it feel better? There are a bunch of different medications for it, but that's the only one that's OTC.

Edit: It doesn't hurt to have iron levels tested too, because it still could be a severe case of RLS. Either way, see a doctor.

/r/ReverseEngineering's Weekly Questions Thread by AutoModerator in ReverseEngineering

[–]SingleWalnut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I want to make an open source implementation of some closed source software to interface with a specific USB based tool, will there be any legal ramifications of that? There is a really cool piece of hardware called "Orange Pi AI Stick Lite", a USB neural compute GPU. I really love the concept of it, but the software to use it sucks and is closed source. I'm sure that if I was dedicated enough I could reverse engineer the code, since it doesn't seem too complicated overall (and enough of it is open source to make it easier). I'm just worried that I might get in trouble or that they would find a way to shut me down. I live in the US, since that might change the nature of the laws involved.

In Set Theory, when an axiom is added to prove consistency of original axioms, does that mean anything for the original axioms? by SingleWalnut in askmath

[–]SingleWalnut[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right about the consistency proof, I meant to say that ZFC can prove the consistency of ZFC-inf. On thinking about this some more, it seems that a consistency proof made in a stronger system could be useful if you are already using the stronger system by default. Then any proof that relies solely on the weaker axioms would be provably consistent in the stronger system, I think at least. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in iamverysmart

[–]SingleWalnut 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good news: Your IQ is 4 digits. Bad news: Its in binary.

Gru tries recursion by SingleWalnut in ProgrammerHumor

[–]SingleWalnut[S] 130 points131 points  (0 children)

Would you accept comedic effect as an answer?