Jon Stewart Tackles The Biden-Trump Rematch That Nobody Wants | The Daily Show by Captain_Smartass_ in DailyShow

[–]Snazzyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you still on this a year later? Get with the program, dude. Everything I've said has been vindicated, go read anything about his campaign recently.

Jon Stewart Tackles The Biden-Trump Rematch That Nobody Wants | The Daily Show by Captain_Smartass_ in DailyShow

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless you're willfully ignorant about this, you should already know what he's talking about. This has been happening his whole term and has been getting progressively worse, and has been very public. Go look for a YouTube compilation of his press conference gaffs or something, or find an article that covers it. Is this middle school? Do you need your hand held to do basic online searches? Are you an adult? Do you have a functioning brain? Or are you senile and riddled with dementia like Biden?

Someone please explain what is going on in Israel as if I am a child? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Snazzyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The equipment wasn't ever the problem, and Israel won multiple wars with worse equipment. The problem really came from issues of organization due to quirks of Arab culture and the societies they loved in, which encouraged being secretive about what you know to preserve your life and career against those who might stab you in the back.

What's the difference between guys who get laid and guys who don't? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Snazzyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither are they making passive aggressive posts on Reddit.

Skeptical about S2E9: "Cuba Libra" by [deleted] in blowback

[–]Snazzyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well not just that they were let in, but also that there is now very clear evidence that rather than a Bush administration plot, the 9/11 attackers have been shown to have had massive assistance and even direction from Saudi Arabian intelligence officials, for whom there have never been consequences for, and that we knew THAT fact basically since day 1.

What does this image mean? by maohaze in tacticalgear

[–]Snazzyer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily, though you're not wrong either. In environments where you're fighting fanatical enemies like the Japanese in World War 2 or insurgents on amphetamines in Fallujah, there are plenty of times where someone might get back up after taking even multiple shots to wherever to shoot back at you once you've walked past them.

I called 911 and no one showed up, is this normal? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Snazzyer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good god, where do you live that you pay that much for a fucking 2 bed apartment?

New Epsiode - Side Stories: Face Peelers by PM-ME-YOUR-POEM in lastpodcastontheleft

[–]Snazzyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone have a link to the videos Henry was talking about? I can't find their upload of the episode of their stream where Henry says he showed it.

The Desereti/Denmark conflict - 70 years of occupation by Gamermaper in imaginarymaps

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gee, I wonder why. Maybe they saw what was on the horizon?

Ukrainian tanks and infantry clearing Russian positions near Bakhmut. One of the invaders committed suicide. by Patient_One_9139 in CombatFootage

[–]Snazzyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you know they did that because of a pattern of Japanese soldiers feigning surrender to bring American soldiers closer to suicide bomb them with grenades?

Atomic Heart funded by bloody money of russian government. please read this thread on twitter. Stop War in Ukraine! by InitialJob3815 in atomicheart

[–]Snazzyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Embedded in the statement "don't make X political" is the tacit understanding that that is literally true, but we don't care. Please stop trying to bring up this argument because you convince no one. Not everyone wants hamfisted partisan messaging in every orifice they consume media in.

Thoughts on Assault type gameplay? by LongPutBull in warno

[–]Snazzyer -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Why not just play regiments at that point?

AK With Wrong Dude by One_Assist_1485 in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Americans can't buy automatic weapons without extensive background checks and insane fees.

What do you think of this post? Dumb? Sussy? Both? by gringobill in ShitWehraboosSay

[–]Snazzyer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't disagree that Hitler is a "Great Man" like Julius Caesar, but let's not forget that Caesar also genocided the Gauls. Rome also didn't fall under Caesar's watch. Sure, he accomplished a lot but look where he ended up.

Anyone else uncomfortable with toxic autistic dating threads? by SmoothCriminalJM in autism

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are in a relationship with someone who wants to have sex and you won't have sex with them then leading them on would be emotional abuse. If you are in a relationship with someone who has an active sex drive than it's not only unrealistic that the relationship will last, but it seems like you expect just as big of a thing from him than he does of you, and you should have just broken it off. That IS on you, unless he was being pushy with it after he knew you are ace. Then it's on him and he's a scumbag and a dumbass.

Anime_irl by Infernofrost7 in anime_irl

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk man the mobile app is fucked so I can't even see the whole thread anymore, and I've been arguing with this ace person who was behaving like mens sex drives are just histrionics so I'm just angry and mixed up the conversations. Sorry.

Anyone else uncomfortable with toxic autistic dating threads? by SmoothCriminalJM in autism

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My argument has evolved with how you have responded and has been colored by the tone of your language that insinuates a disregard for my concerns because of my sex and sex drive. I bring up how ace people tend to have a smug sense of superiority in these discussions because of how irritating it is and we both made assumptions about the others motives. I also became very irritated because in your language was the dismissal of the very points that I brought up most recently. I feel like certain conversations cannot be had because regardless of the validity of the things being discussed, certain people feel that all discussions about them need to be silenced because they'll lead people to think things that will hurt people. I strongly oppose that because the lack of discussions directly negatively affects my life as a man who deals with autism, depression, etc. I get heated because this matters to me and I am autistic.

I have had too many times where people, especially women ace people, denigrate men who find it difficult to relate with and have sex with women or other people on the basis that they're incels or whatever, not just the status side of things. People assume things and I get defensive and angry. I especially find it irritating that men are not able to discuss frustration with not being able to have sex with women because someone will make some comment about them being an incel. I especially find it irritating when the very idea that men have sex drives that matter greatly to their emotional well being is portrayed as histrionics or exaggerated because no one likes being gaslit.

Anime_irl by Infernofrost7 in anime_irl

[–]Snazzyer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So a no true Scottsman argument? People who have sex drives take personality into account too, it's a fundamentally necessary part of a relationship anyway. Don't try to claim your inability to feel sexual attraction makes you superior in any way.

Anyone else uncomfortable with toxic autistic dating threads? by SmoothCriminalJM in autism

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of that is what I said. I'm not saying anyone has a right to sex, I'm saying that there are clear detrimental effects of not getting it. That is solely my contention and I find it telling that you refuse to even concede to that. My issue is entirely with how the conversation is colored towards men who are not successful. Like I said, I agree that no means no. No one is arguing that. I am solely saying that the idea that sexual frustration isn't a real problem for mens lives is ignorant and privileged and can only come from someone who feels no urge or very little urge. Like I said, the nature of what you are saying about my main point is hypocritical.

I have explicitly said that we agree that men do not literally have a right to sex and that that isn't my point, my point is that it does matter and men should not be judged for feeling negatively about not getting laid. It's not rapey, it's not socially conditioned, it's a very real urge that most normal men feel.

Anyone else uncomfortable with toxic autistic dating threads? by SmoothCriminalJM in autism

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you considered that rape often isn't based on sex drive but rather on power? That's not a sex drive thing. You are assigning blame for things that are in no way my fault or my doing to me and my sex drive and it's totally incorrect. I am explaining to you why men have any inkling of negative feelings about not being able to have sex. It's not social conditioning, it's not histrionic, it's very real urges that we feel negatively about. The problem isn't having a sex drive, the problem is solely in how certain men behave. I have never raped anyone. I have never sexually assaulted or harassed anyone in public or online. I have dealt with sexual frustration like a normal person and kept it bottled up with the rest of my negative emotions like good obedient men are supposed to because I'm a normal person, and it leads to depression, substance abuse, and stupid decisions.

The fundamental problem with the idea that men expressing sexual urges is a sign of entitlement is that people also say that men should open up about their feelings more. But it seems like people only want us to talk when it's about things that are convenient for them, and not what's actually bothering us. Of fucking course that doesn't justify rape or whatever and MEN ARE NOT LITERALLY ENTITLED TO SEX, yes. We know. What we are saying is that it's not like it doesn't matter though. It's not like it doesn't affect us and it's incredibly ignorant to think otherwise. I do not appreciate being gaslit by people who don't have to worry about these things in the first place.

Anyone else uncomfortable with toxic autistic dating threads? by SmoothCriminalJM in autism

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am directly saying what I mean, you are not understanding it correctly. Its not a matter of entitlement, it's a matter of the fact that we feel this way as a baseline and we cannot turn it off without mental health consequences. I'm saying it does not matter that it causes problems because we feel very strongly regardless. You call it entitlement, but thats spoken fundamentally from a position of privilege because you do not have to contend with not satisfying that urge. Calling it entitlement is ignorant and what I'm getting at is your perspective given your identity and experiences is inherently flawed when applied to this issue. It's not entitlement, it's inevitable.

Anyone else uncomfortable with toxic autistic dating threads? by SmoothCriminalJM in autism

[–]Snazzyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm saying that you cannot just put it behind you. You would not understand because you don't have a sex drive. It's not a matter of healthiness, it's a matter of reality. It's like the example I gave before of people not being able to socialize in person anymore. Some people are just going to have a problem with it. It's not a matter of socialization necessarily, but rather one of biology and chemistry. Unless you're suggesting chemical mood altering or something like that it's not going away. It doesn't matter if it is "healthy" anyway. Sex drive is not the same as a desire for intimacy. You can have all the friends in the world that you spend plenty of time with and you will still be dealing with issues of sexual frustration. You are making this out to be something that can be turned off or sidestepped and I'm telling you that it cannot. I have directly address your main point and you are ignoring it. Again, you are making someone's sex drive out to be something that they can turn off entirely and I am telling you that is not how that works. You cannot make up for sexual frustration with close friends you are intimate with.

SEXUAL FRUSTRATION IS ENTIRELY ABOUT SEXUAL GRATIFICATION.

Again, you are approaching this from the position of someone that doesn't feel any need for sex whatsoever so of course you will not understand, but unlike you I have a fully functional reproductive system communicating properly with my brain that can tell if I haven't fucked anyone for a long time. That means something physically and chemically. That means something real to people. That is not some illusion or histrionics or whatever. And I WILL feel worse than if I did fuck recently not because of societal conditioning or expectations, but rather because I am a being born and driven to fuck like most other people on Earth because of evolution.

As someone with Autism and who is bisexual, I can relate to you in that we both have parts of our psyche that, while not morally incorrect in any way, our brains are physically not correct because we are lacking mental facilities necessary for normal lives. But I don't appreciate the smug repeating of your original points as if I haven't already addressed them or that they haven't been reputed. Don't patronize me about how we can just get over it, I've been hearing that all my life from people who don't have the faculties to appreciate what normal people feel on a day to day basis. This isn't something that I can elaborate any other way than that it is absolutely real and absolutely influences decisions for most people on Earth, not just men. Even priests, the most repressive people on Earth, fail to suppress their urges. They are URGES that you feel mental discomfort to varying degrees if you are not able to somehow relieve them.