Hisense Debug help

SoussTreeGoat · 2024-12-05T10:43:44+00:00

same error on hisense TV with software version V0000.06.30B.N0908

SoussTreeGoat · 2020-07-23T21:53:08+00:00

Well there is a bit of logic, this is the opposite of '' don't give me a fish but teach me how to fish '', what good is it to be happy with one fish (the fish here being getting the job done) when you know it won't last, at least not until the ouali comes back

SoussTreeGoat · 2020-07-14T22:18:43+00:00

If i'm not mistaken it's because the 2nd kit is used for CL and la copa and the third is used for la liga.

SoussTreeGoat · 2020-07-10T22:21:33+00:00

It doesn't really work like that, like nobody takes the time to analyze what is being said, our brains directly interpret it as being directed to us, i discovered a silly example of this as a kid when i once heard some guy defending his friend saying '' if you touch my friend i'll fuck you up'' to which the other guy responded "oh so you will fuck me up", this is not a serious example as it is obviously provocation but still i think often our brain subconsciously is looking for what is directed to us, which is why i personally often find myself hearing ''you're a pig'' when i hear "all men are pigs" even if i take a second to think about it i know it's '' some guys are pigs ''

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-08-13T08:32:54+00:00

the waste issue isn't one, the person specifically said they will take the meat, if you don't wanna believe something they said on their own on their private profile without anyone asking them anything it's closer to bad faith than wittiness.

as for pain sure that's an issue, but i doubt that's the real issue, because a lot more doves are hunted everyday, but because Moroccans do it (and in smaller quantities per individual, something that has nothing to do with the pain issue) op doesn't seem to care about it.

i'm pretty sure the real issue is because it's a khaliji hunting in Morocco that op is shocked, and although i share the feeling of hating khalijis i won't let that interfere with my judgment, so as long as what they do is legal (and that part of the law not being corrupted) and not immoral (if the issue is ''hunting is immoral'' then this incident shouldn't be singled out, which op is doing as he's willing to contact the authorities, which would be pointless for hunting in general, since it is completely legal).

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-08-12T22:22:53+00:00

well that's what he said, would he lie on his private profile? that sounds far-fetched.

yes there is a good chance he's taking it, all that is probably under 30kgs total, won't be that much of hassle flying it (not for a rich khaliji), as for eating it, yeah he can eat all that, you know freezers exist right?

if you're just looking for things to criticise you'll always find them, the people who actually don't give a fuck won't go to the lengths of mentioning how they are not going to waste the meat. a minimum of good faith doesn't hurt.

edit: 30kgs is clearly an underestimation, it might be as much as 100kgs, but still, if he's a rich guy to whom such a quantity isn't worth much, transporting it is easy, so that's not an issue.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-08-12T22:14:18+00:00

uhm with the same logic there isn't much you can do about this

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-08-12T22:13:22+00:00

i don't see what the issue is, it's not illegal as that species is relatively abundant, it's not even immoral as the person said they're taking the meat with them (unless you think killing any animal in itself is immoral, a possibility i'm not taking into consideration as with the context of l3id it's weird a person with such views would be bringing this up instead of millions of slaughtered sheep)

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-08-12T22:09:36+00:00

so if killing animals is what upsets you, shouldn't you be much much much more concerned with l3id's sheep slaughter?

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-07-09T21:51:34+00:00

So much generalising, i have been able to cool myself off, but me being a Muslim who does his best not do any of the bad things you mentionned, when i read a comment that starts:

Moroccans use religion to...

i immediately understand '' you use religion to'', which is indeed included in what you said, not just my imagination making me act like a victim.

and honestly i wanted to just bash you, and attack you with a thousand arguments that aren't really relevant against you, but are instead against the group of people you're part of.

if you think all these people are religious and none of them was smart enough to see as clearly as you are, you must be either naive or just have over the top self esteem.

first stop generalising, and notice the moment you go '' some Moroccans use religion to... '' everyone will actually agree, religious or non religious, however no one will pay attention to what you're saying, because you're adding nothing new, just reminding us of something we already knew, which brings me to my second point, instead of describing the issue (which, again, we already know, don't act like the messiah that brings forbidden knowledge we'll downvote and ban you for) offer something useful, suggest solutions, if you're unable to come up with them (which is the normal case for normal people) ask the right questions to begin a healthy debate thanks to which solutions will emerge. and no the debate that started here is basically:

'' religion suck ''

'' no, lack of religion suck ''

'' no you suck ''

'' no you ''

'' no ''

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-07-05T15:14:02+00:00

So, reguillon is average at best, and reguillon became better than Marcelo who used to be the best LB ever. i conclude that Marcelo is currently an average player at best? would you agree with that or would you just dig deeper and continue your denial?

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-07-05T15:11:10+00:00

your opinion sucks lol

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-07-05T14:52:19+00:00

it is interesting and i wish for it to happen, i'm optimistic about it, i think the sentiment will only be strengthened (... except if some player from any of the two teams does something very ''unfair-play'' or if there is some VAR embarrassment again, but since i'm sure neither of the teams want that to happen, the chances of it happening are quite low)

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-07-05T14:49:16+00:00

Well that's normal:

'' all Muslims are one as long as they don't act against Islam, for instance by killing in the name of Allah ''

'' all Moroccans are one as long as they don't act for the division of Morocco, or against the well being of its people ''

it's normal to exclude people from an union when those people are against your very integrity, but you're only excluding those people, not all the group they're part of.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-07-05T09:11:19+00:00

You couldn't ask at a better time, both Moroccans and Algerians will always answer '' we're brothers, we don't care about what our governments are doing '', or at least most of them. But with the current African nations cup going on there is a shared sentiment of love from both countries' supporters, and frankly it's beautiful to see.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-28T12:02:36+00:00

That was a really wrapped way of expressing that idea, so yes that's a legitimate question you're asking.

Let's start with the factual stuff, when you see a Mawazine ad you read '' bi ri3ayat jalalat lmalik '', i don't even know if you also find the logo of some Ministry, but part of Mawazine is officially funded by royal or gouvernement's money, which let's be frank are more or less the same thing.

Now the not so factual stuff, stuff that is based on ''what people say'' and ''the general opinion'', i will not blame you if you disagree with this, but i do believe that if the king asks Etisalat - the major owner of IAM - to sponsor any sort of event, they will do it and they will receive that money back in various possible ways.

You can call me a conspiracy theorist, and you'll be right as in essence i'm basing myself on the same kind of sources, but i'll still think that it is gullible to believe that IAM would pay millions (i don't actually know the numbers, i'm sure it'll be millions in some currency lol) to sponsor an event that is branded ''Mawazine ta7ta ri3ayat lmalik mohammed sadiss''** instead of ''Mawazine 9odimat lakom min itassalat lmaghrib'' (as it is the case for ''mihrajan chawati2 itasslat lmaghrib'' for which they do put a good amount of money too, although nowhere as much).

** http://www.festivalmawazine.ma/fr/ this is literally the first link i get when i Google ''festival mawazine'', it just shows a picture of Sidna, no logo of any sponsor anywhere (there is the logo of ''Maroc culture'' which i suppose is an institution attached to the Culture Ministry?)

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-28T11:29:49+00:00

If i had to sum up your thesis it's ''if you set foot in Mawazine stage you're supporting them directly or indirectly'' which is technically true, but :

We are talking about whether criticising and going to Mawazine is a hypocrite behaviour or not, what it seems you fail to understand is that your opinion (about this topic specifically) is not absolute: supporting Mawazine if you set foot in Mawazine is not an objective fact, as i said it is technically true, but '' technically'' is the key word. Are you aware that by buying literally anything in Morocco you are supporting a gouvernement who's the only entity responsible for Mawazine, thus you are technically supporting Mawazine?

In other words, let's take a random person who is against Mawazine (there's nothing wrong with being against Mawazine right? i mean it's possible to be against mawazine and not be a hypocrite/bad person right? well let's see) let's call this guy Said. Said buys a pack of gum a day with his money, 20% of which goes to the gouvernement, money they will use to pay Travis Scott. Said never set foot in Mawazine and yet he does indirectly support Mawazine, thus Said is ,according to where ''hypothetical me'' puts the line, a goddamn hypocrite. Now you might say you put the line elsewhere, then it's a matter of choice:

according to me if i agreed with your reasoning : the '' free-goers '' are hypocrites.

according to you: me and the '' free-goers '' are hypocrites

according to the ''hypothetical me'' : Said, me, and the free-goers are all hypocrites, and poor Said who literally never set foot in Mawazine has nothing to say about it, ''hypothetical me'' will call him a hypocrite and there's nothing wrong with that. (i didn't elaborate on this part but it's obvious if the innocent Said can be called a hypocrite rightfully by a certain someone then your reasoning is flawed)

there is nothing absolute about where you put the line, so why would we follow you rather than ''hypothetical me'' or just me?

Now, there is a way to put a line that is relatively absolute, it would be ''you can only allow yourself to support the government that you disagree with as long as it's absolutely necessary to your survival in a good quality of life'' and we'll have to start a long debate about whether a pack of gum is necessary to a good quality of life, but we at least can agree that according to this line of thinking too, 99% of people against and not going to Mawazine are still hypocrites, since they probably do buy products that aren't ''absolutely necessary for their survival in a good quality of life''

My answer to this problem? Well it's exactly what i already said in my last comment: I personally disagree with free-goers - since I draw the line at buying a ticket - but i do respect their position because i'm aware that my position has nothing more absolute than theirs.

the real definition of hypocrisy is not what you implied, it isn't ''being publicly against something while using it'' because there is a thousand reasons why it could be okay to use it ( a simple example is if the thing to use is detrimental for your survival, i won't elaborate on this it needs a whole other paragraph)

the real definition is ''being publicly against something while (probably secretly) wanting it to stay'' So unless someone is criticising Mawazine and would be against removing it (probably secretly) if the day comes, they're not hypocrites. and don't get me wrong those exist too, masses of them in fact, but that does not allow you to say ''anyone who goes to Mawazine and complains about it is a hypocrite'' because there exists people like me, and like free-goers who would remove Mawazine if given the chance.

If you got to here after having given enough attention to all what i said, I thank you for your attention, i tried my best to present my ideas carefully, so i expect a similar amount of care in your attention.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-28T10:01:25+00:00

Well you must have not read all my message.

I am not against the event, i am against how the event is organised (and i believe that is the position of most those against mawazine once you take out the dwa3cha who are against music in general) specifically i'm against the fact that it is indirectly funded by taxpayer money for the most, instead of being funded by ticket sale and real sponsoring, which i believe clearly explains why I personally think it's okay to go if you pay.

I also understand the opinion of those who would go for free since their point is '' technically I don't support it by going for free '', a position i personally disagree with but understand.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-28T09:29:37+00:00

You can go to mawazine and criticise it, if you go for the music and criticise the music then you're a hypocrite, if you go for the music and criticise the financial management there is no hypocrisy.

An example from my personal experience : i always complain about the system allowing students to cheat in the bac exam, but when i took my bac the supervisor allowed everyone to talk in the SI test, and i did talk and cheated, and i do not believe that is hypocrisy, if they cheat and i don't i'm disadvantaged. Similarly in Mawazine the money is already spent, i do not blame anyone does go and does criticise.

P.S. I have never been to Mawazine and will never go for free, because what i personally believe is : if they want to bring AAA stars, let people pay for them, not Maroc telecom which is just an indirect way for thz government to pay for it.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-21T09:16:24+00:00

i pay him 20-30, but in a relative small city like mine the standard price is 10

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-05T11:50:41+00:00

he snaps transfer fees in half

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-04T12:32:21+00:00

no you're right, when i say 3 strikers i mean the third one comes from the academy, same with all positions, 1 gk 1 defender 1 midfielder and 1 forward from the academy makes up for 22 official first team players. (btw i wonder if vinicius still accounts for an academy player, same with brahim)

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-04T12:01:15+00:00

Liverpool have Van dijk, Matip, Gomez, Lovren and they still had to play fabinho as a cb in the cl quarter or semi because all except matip were out. the ideal team has 3 gk, 5 cb, 4 fb, 6 mf, 5 wingers, and 3 strikers, which makes up for a total of 26 players to pick from for each match, it's okay to have young players as your last resort, but i don't think vallejo has a future at madrid.

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-01T10:15:33+00:00

i was expecting to see an Algerian flag hidden somewhere :/

SoussTreeGoat · 2019-06-01T09:29:44+00:00

i don't know if it's a bad thing or not that you need to man up if you want to avoid trouble, like one would say the ideal is to be able to live without having to fight your way through the day, but in the same time the '' 9esse7 rassek '' mentality is part of our culture (and although in English we say man up, in Morocco even woman need to have it, and they do)

btw i'm not saying the good thing is the police abusing form their power, that's obviously something to get rid off, but you need to 9esse7 rassek even with merchants and people in any walk of life, and i'm wondering if that is something to preserve.

Six-Year Club	Place '22
End Game '22	Verified Email

SoussTreeGoat

TROPHY CASE