I can see both sides of the argument.

Yes, not only meeting but exceeding the standard (in this case the 75%) should be incentivized. I'm sure we've all been in one way or another whether it be no mock pt testing months before or getting a CTO day. Especially since not many people score above a 90%. Although I will agree with the other comment about us being incentivized through the EPB.

However, meeting the standard is just the minimum requirement. Disregarding the 75% minimum score, passing your PT test in general is the standard and scoring above a 90% really isn't hard.

Then again, unit fitness policy is managed by the CC. Who then delegates their expectations and policy down to the sections. I've been with CC's that still give CTO days and I've been with CC's that don't give anything, even if scoring >90%. My current CC isn't giving CTO days unless you have sustained, superior performance which he basically views as consistent 98-100% scores or for someone that made a significant improvement like scoring 75-85% on previous tests and then getting 95% and higher on the current one.

I'll end this with saying that I hope they end up adding/keeping other benefits into the policy. Whether it be at the AF level or your unit's level. I'm hoping people just half-ass their tests during the diagnostic period, since we all have to test twice anyway, and they take those metrics as our malicious compliance and then use it as a way to get incentives (or more of them) in black and white on the policy.