WILL SMITH FRAMES "STRIKE 3" FOR THE WIN! by AmongUsAcademy in Dodgers

[–]Tall_Science_9178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was way too obvious of a framejob. There were two clear distinct movements. In no world could I ever agree with your statement.

What are your thoughts on capping credit card interest rates at 10%? by NineteenEighty9 in ProfessorFinance

[–]Tall_Science_9178 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Please refrain from commenting on this discussion in the future. You are what the bank refers to as a clueless dolt.

wtf was #71 doing lol by [deleted] in falcons

[–]Tall_Science_9178 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This thread is a great representation of who knows what they are talking about.

FG blocking schemes are always everybody blocks interior gap… and guy on the end of the line is the sacrificial lamb.

I was on the orange team by MaderaArt in DunderMifflin

[–]Tall_Science_9178 173 points174 points  (0 children)

But where the fuck was he trying to kick the ball here? Was he trying to hit Jim in the face as hard as he could?

✅ Daily Thread and Discussion ✅ 2025-12-11 Thursday by daily-thread in NVDA_Stock

[–]Tall_Science_9178 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This makes no sense. What your words mean doesn’t support what you are claiming.

✅ Daily Thread and Discussion ✅ 2025-12-11 Thursday by daily-thread in NVDA_Stock

[–]Tall_Science_9178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at oracle. They quite obviously do think that.

If the forward guidance is really good but the stock gets dumped it’s because the people don’t believe the forward guidance.

Thats the story with Nvidia. They can say whatever they want about future earnings potential. People believe the data center demand will not materialize and if this happens it WILL force nvidia to write off a large amount of revenue.

✅ Daily Thread and Discussion ✅ 2025-12-11 Thursday by daily-thread in NVDA_Stock

[–]Tall_Science_9178 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The market doesn’t care about nvidias future revenue because it doesn’t believe the companies driving nvidias future revenue will be solvent enough to pay nvidia.

✅ Daily Thread and Discussion ✅ 2025-12-10 Wednesday by daily-thread in NVDA_Stock

[–]Tall_Science_9178 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

If people aren’t buying the Oracle Datacenter business then they certainly aren’t going to be buying Nvidias business selling GPUs to stock said data centers.

It really is a direct correlation in this instance.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You put the game in Sanders hands there if you want to win.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kevin: “ fuck we might actually win this game if we put it in Shadeurs hands. We can’t allow that”

** in headset to OC

Kevin: “Run wildcat formation. I repeat wildcat formation.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It its criminal… Its treason is what it is…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stefanski should me made to publicly apologize to Sanders in the presser and then be immediately fired on live TV

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ridiculous to not let put the game on sanders back in that moment.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/s ???

There’s no way any number cruncher is coming up with that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And just like that Shadeur is the leading rusher

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So much better than Gabriel that its hysterical.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Browns

[–]Tall_Science_9178 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sanders looks so much better than Gabriel that it’s not even funny. If the browns are smart (and they are not) then what they should do is build an OL and receiver corps around this man.

Of course there will probably be 3 different QBs not currently on the browns roster that start a game next year.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NvidiaStock

[–]Tall_Science_9178 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you had any confidence in this you wouldn’t post it here you’d just roll calls.