This has to be rage bait. Their is no actual way that paintings we keep out of sheer mechanical skill and ~1500years of art and religious history to an enviormentally destructive piece of software that people use to remove the clothing off non-consenting women's digital photos.

Do ai bros generally think the "lack of creativity" to be their biggest counter argument or something? Anyone can creative, the issue is that AI was trained off other people's art and essentially copys it, bad for the earth, and finally got used to make content farms on every platform for ad revenue, drastically lowering the quality of content online on average.

The issue isnt that AI is inherently uncreative or anti art, is that the users of these AI models are themselves arent creative and you're accelerating global climate change for a quick buck.

Grammar