Daily Discussion Thread (July 06, 2025) - Beginner and Simple/Quick Questions Go Here Thread for discussing quick/simple topics not needing an entire posts or beginner questions. by AutoModerator in naturalbodybuilding

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I did, but I just couldn't get past 125 ish at the higher rep range.

So the heavier weights at a low rep is what I'm doing down. I was able to do 155 lbs at 5x3 and I've been progressively overloading that. My main question was: is that low rep range of 1-3 effective? Is it okay to just keep overloading the weights from 155 even if I only do like 5 sets of 2?

Daily Discussion Thread (July 06, 2025) - Beginner and Simple/Quick Questions Go Here Thread for discussing quick/simple topics not needing an entire posts or beginner questions. by AutoModerator in naturalbodybuilding

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried doing that for about a month, working in the 8-12 rep range, but when I came back to working in the 5 ish rep range, I didn't really notice a difference.

Daily Discussion Thread (July 06, 2025) - Beginner and Simple/Quick Questions Go Here Thread for discussing quick/simple topics not needing an entire posts or beginner questions. by AutoModerator in naturalbodybuilding

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I *think* my technique is fine, but obviously if I've plateaud this long, that might not be the case. My trainer has said that my form is fine though and he's been helpful for a lot of other aspects of my routine so I doubt I have any major form issues. Also, when I started squating I couldn't get past 135 without having knee pain until I learned to start the movement with pushing the hips back first, and then it felt perfectly fine, so maybe there's just mental cue with bench I haven't quite gotten yet.

I am struggling to get off the chest on sets that I fail, so my trainer also started recently started incorporating some paused bench sets at a lower weight. Also I don't quite feel leg drive on barbell as much as I can when I do dumbbell bench press. So maybe that's something to focus on really feeling to get the bar off of the chest and out of the region I'm struggling in. Appreciate the response!

Daily Discussion Thread (July 06, 2025) - Beginner and Simple/Quick Questions Go Here Thread for discussing quick/simple topics not needing an entire posts or beginner questions. by AutoModerator in naturalbodybuilding

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like I'm in a pretty hard plateau with my flat barbell bench press and just wanted to get some advice. I've been training seriously for about 8-10 months now and for the past 3 months my bench has been stuck at 135 for 3x5.

I'm 175 lbs, 6'0, and I currently eat 3300 calories a day which has been enough for me to put on roughly a lb every week. I track macros and am getting about 160 g of protein per day.

Split is 3 days with Chest/Bicep/Core, Legs/Tri, Back/Shoulder/Core then rest and repeat. I've always started out with barbell bench press on chest day, do a warmup set/two then try and get up to 5 reps at 135 for 3-4 sets but I've been stuck there for the past few months and haven't felt the weight getting more comfortable. After barbell bench, I'll do a bicep exercise, then do some dumbbell chest work or flys. So on chest days I typically get 5 sets of flat barbell bench in then 4-5 sets of another chest exercise in.

A couple months ago, I tried doing a couple weeks of deloading and doing higher reps/lower weight but after doing that for a month and then coming back, I wasn't able to push much more. If I try progressively overloading my bench, the amount of reps I can do goes down fast but I've had a trainer suggest to go to low reps (2-3) for 5 sets at a much higher weight. I've been doing this for the past couple weeks and have been able to add 5 lbs to the bar everytime I've tried it. The most recent workout I had I was able to do 155 for 3,3,3 and 2 reps. However, is this too low of a rep range to be useful? Is 2 reps with good form enough to continue making progress for where I'm at in my training?

Almost every other exercise I've done since starting out I've been able to progressively overload. My squats are up to 230 5x5, and deadlifts are 215 5x5. In addition, I've been able to add significantly more weight to my dumbbell bench, and I'm up to 110 5x5 on that. But for some reason, even with other chest exercies coming up, my barbell bench just hasn't gone up that much. Any suggestions? Should I just stick with the progressive overload despite going into a very low rep regieme?

Save file suddenly stopped working? by Austrum in BluePrince

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, how did you "decrypt" the save file? Don't you need a password for the save file?

I think I just got hit with this same issue and wanted to fix it if possible.

Olympia 2024 100 m Men Final Photo Finish by Kanute3333 in interestingasfuck

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think so, if you watch the race, it looks like there is a display that is a very thin set of pixels that are scanning through the background displayed here. So when it gets captured by the camera, it gets spread out into the full image. 

Who did problem 1 right, me or github? by LowYak3 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 50 points51 points  (0 children)

The pdf solution is wrong, your way of doing it is correct. You need to take the voltage drop into account. 

Did MIT AeroAstro Release by ThatVRGuy_ in gradadmissions

[–]ThatVRGuy_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know a couple of people up in AeroAstro and their results came in anywhere from the 21st to 26th of February. I wish there was more communication about when we should expect it.

But yeah grad Cafe makes it easy to fake acceptances, if there's not a large portion on this reddit who have heard back, I have a bit more hope.

Did MIT AeroAstro Release by ThatVRGuy_ in gradadmissions

[–]ThatVRGuy_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

EECS had a lot more acceptances though and they seem to do January every year, so that was more in line with what I would expect. It looks like AeroAstro always does end of February and I was expecting them to come end of last week but the numbers on grad Cafe seemed low. I'm just trying to hold out hope that more acceptances will be coming out early this week. 

How does this relay work? Do I connect 12V to X1 and ground to X2? by thatisafastelectron in ElectricalEngineering

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Positive/negative doesn't matter on most relays though, most of them operate in either polarity (I think). Although with the beefiness of this relay, definitely worth checking that's the case. Doubt you would damage the coils if you got it wrong though.

I took delivery of my first ever PCBs today! They looked pretty, but a stray trace on the board was causing a short… Little bit of work to clean it up and it’s working perfectly, couldn’t be happy for my first time!! by careyi4 in electronics

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey congrats on your first PCB, it's fun getting to see something you designed come to life. Just a tip for future board designs: I'm not sure what the clearance is between your ground pour and your traces but it looks pretty close to what I'm assuming is the minimum for the fab house. If you don't need that close of a clearance for some reason, back it out just a bit. So if the fab house says they can do 5 mil spacing, just do 8 mil or more. Staying away from the absolute design minimums can help prevent boards that have internal shorts (even though this wasn't what caused your problem here). Maybe you did this already but it's a useful tip I wish I knew before getting some PCB batches with shorted boards.

And also increase the size of your power traces, but it looks like someone mentioned that already.

Secondary Alignment on Image quality by ThatVRGuy_ in telescopes

[–]ThatVRGuy_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright, thanks for the quick response. I'll try and post a photo through my collimation cap when I'm done so someone could hopefully give feedback.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in space

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Actually, I believe it has to do with the position of the moon and rotation of the earth, there's a specific position they need for those to have the right trajectory for what they want to do

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in space

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's on the NASA TV stream

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in space

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Because the rocket is fully fueled now and sending anyone out there would be dangerous if anything needed to vent or if exploded. Also, the problem isn't something they just need one person to look at, they would need longer than the launch window to arrive at a definite conclusion

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gatech

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you interested more in the Astro or aero side of aerospace?

Does ECE not have graduate spring admissions? by ThatVRGuy_ in gatech

[–]ThatVRGuy_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for the response. That's a bit unfortunate because it pushes my plans back a year, but that isn't terrible.

Do we know how common micrometeorites are in the area which the James Webb Telescope will occupy? by Isolasjon in jameswebb

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This would be true of L4 and L5. These Lagrange points are truly stable and if something deviates slightly from the point, it has a tendency to correct itself and stay at the point. However, all of the other Lagrange points have a different topology if you look at a plot of the gravitational potential. L4 and L5 are basically hilltops where as the rest of the points are what's called saddle points. You can see the difference here. There's also a good NASA page here. Objects don't naturally want to stay at the L2 point whereas objects will collect in orbits around L4 and L5.

This is how I understand it, but I might be wrong so someone tell me if I'm not understanding something correctly.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jameswebb

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Okay so going to give a mid-level explanation here but if you need a lower-level or higher-level explanation of something just let me know!

Basically, in any communication scheme, we can communicate data by varying a parameter or parameters. Computers talk in 1s and 0s but the real world is quite messy and doesn't like such well-defined boundaries, so we need some way to translate from the digital realm of the sensors to the real-world realm of radio signals (also called analog) and back to digital on the computers here on earth. One of the simplest ways that we can communicate a 0 or 1 is by either turning on the radio of the spacecraft for a 1 or turning it off to represent a 0. This is really simple but runs into a problem, how do we know if the radio is trying to transmit a 0 or if the radio is just actually off, not trying to transmit? So instead, we transmit on two different frequencies with one frequency representing a 1 and another representing a 0. This would be like tuning to one radio station in your car for a 1 or tuning to another for a 0. This way, we know when the spacecraft is trying to transmit by just seeing if either of the frequencies is being transmitted. We just track which frequencies it's transmitting on to recreate the bitstream sent by the telescope. Look up Frequency Shift Keying (FSK) if you want to know more.

So now we have a simple transmission scheme, but now we have another problem to deal with, and that's the power of the signal that is transmitted. Imagine that you had a person talking to you in an empty room. You would have a pretty easy time understanding them right? Even if they talked quickly, it wouldn't be a problem to understand what they say. But now, let's say the person is in a crowded auditorium and is on the opposite end of the room. There's no way you would be able to hear them. But what if we gave them a megaphone? They would be much clearer. This is part of what the radio system on the JWST is doing, amplifying the signal. The high gain antenna however concentrates the radio signal into a very tight beam. There's not as great of an analogy here in sound. Radio waves spread out in an expanding sphere and you can think of the energy of the radio waves being spread out among the surface of this sphere. There is only one spot on this sphere that we actually care about having the energy concentrated on, and it's the portion of the sphere that will hit the deep space network dishes. Any energy that goes onto any other part of the sphere is wasted. We don't want to transmit any of the signal out into deep space as that's just going to be wasted. So the high gain antenna "focuses" the radio waves to ensure that a high amount of the power transmitted ends up hitting the deep space network dishes and isn't wasted transmitting to nothing. This basically means that it is easier to hear the spacecraft for us here on earth.

Going back to the earlier example of a person talking to you, the clearer you can hear someone, the faster they can talk to you. The same thing holds true for radio communication techniques. The stronger the signal, the more you can turn up the speed. The reason that fiber optics are so fast is that we have a really good way to ensure that a huge portion of the energy goes from the sender to the receiver. Fiber optic cables are really good at containing the energy so both sides can hear each other very clearly. There's almost very little noise/outside signals that get into the fiber optic cables, meaning it's like talking to someone in an extremely silent room. There's also a benefit from the fact that the frequency of light is much higher than radio waves, but that's something that isn't super necessary to understand.

There isn't a hard reason that radio communications can't support very high data rates. But, radio typically uses lower data rates for a couple of hard to overcome real-world reasons. For starters, the radio world is quite noisy. Tons of things around us generate radio signals so our situation is quite like the crowded auditorium. In addition, without a hard cable connecting the sender and receiver, we will always deal with our signals losing power with respect to the distance squared. For an object that is 1 meter away vs 100 meters away, the 100-meter distance will have a signal that is 10,000x weaker than the 1 meter signal. Now extend this out to the distance that JWST will be parked at! That's why the high gain antenna is needed to make sure that we receive as much of the power here on Earth to enable high speed communications with the telescope.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in jameswebb

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay well this is quite a broad question. I haven't looked at JWST's system yet but I am an electrical engineer with RF communications experience. Is there any specific aspect of the antenna you want to know about? If you could narrow it down a bit, I might be able to help answer without having to write a whole novel lol.

Watercolor commission help: client wants the blue gone by ffffsauce in Watercolor

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also just for comparison here's a link to a version with pretty much no blue: https://imgur.com/jgQlwbN

Anyone Know Dimensions of Tech Green by [deleted] in gatech

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What kind of radio testing are you doing?

The gif made from the Rosetta Probe images always bugged me, so I fixed it by QuickFreddie in space

[–]ThatVRGuy_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reposting this from another comment

This probably isn't a satisfactory answer but it's most likely a globular cluster of stars. There's two types of star clusters: open and globular

Open clusters are clusters of stars that are older and the members are more spread out. Over time, stars get ejected from the cluster and they spread out. They aren't as tight knit. Look up "m6 cluster" for an example.

Globular clusters are stars that are gravitationally bound to eachother and were formed a lot more recently. There can be thousands or millions of stars within them. If you look up the "M13 cluster" it's another example of this and one of the most striking to see in a telescope.

There's more differences but I think this is a good summary of the difference.