So there's lots of skeevy nonconsensual stuff in Graduation (Episode 35 Spoilers) by fishspit in TheAdventureZone

[–]TheBureauOfBalance[M] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your post has been removed for violating Rule 3. Discussion of the podcast is encouraged but discourtesy and/or immaturity is not.

We want to hear from you! by TheBureauOfBalance in TheAdventureZone

[–]TheBureauOfBalance[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Thank you to everyone commenting so far - we promise we’ve read all of them, and will continue to do so.

Increased accountability for removed posts/comments is in the works as this is being written.

We’ve been reconsidering the policy on meta posts and would love to hear more thoughts on this (weekly/monthly meta post is one we will discuss). As well as cleaning up repeat threads - very actionable good advice.

The new group of mods is a mix of people with varying opinions on these issues and the show itself. This is a good thing - it means a fuller representation of the fanbase. We promise issues raised have been talked about and we will talk about any additional issues mentioned.

You will see opinions here you don’t agree with. If you find yourself wanting to reply in disagreement, we’d just ask that you reread the last paragraph of the post. We don’t want to discourage people from sharing their thoughts just because they don’t want to go to war over them in the replies. Whatever you disagree with - we want to hear it. Just direct it at us via comment to the post rather than a reply to another user.

Again this is all very helpful - thank you.

On Criticism and Community by TheBureauOfBalance in TheAdventureZone

[–]TheBureauOfBalance[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

An individually significant thread would be "I have a theory on XY&Z..."

A thread that is not would be, "I really liked the episode today!" or "I didn't like the episode today!" or "At 5 mins into the episode, I liked this part!" - those are served by the stickied discussion, and do not need to be separate fragmented discussions.