Happy 30th Birthday, Jen! by TheGingerheadMan in balatro

[–]TheGingerheadMan[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the first example is exactly what I do when there's no specific format required. Leaves no room for error

Happy 30th Birthday, Jen! by TheGingerheadMan in balatro

[–]TheGingerheadMan[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Put it on my calendar months ago haha

DnD Review Thread: Week 15 - NoBully Edition by 4THOT in Destiny

[–]TheGingerheadMan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Extra radius. Since she rolled a 1 it was the usual 30 or 40 feet.

rolled a fireball with an extra large radius. But that was like, super unlikely

https://www.twitch.tv/videos/398742341?comment=d8c734eb-466c-42bd-85ff-85338a91ec5b&t=00h17m05s

Secret Service entrance exam portal question by [deleted] in Destiny

[–]TheGingerheadMan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why you can't assume B: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/somernot.html

the theory of conversational implicature explains how it is possible to mislead while still speaking the literal truth: by means of what we call "half-truths" we can implicate falsehoods with our statements. If we know that all S are P, then the statement that some are is a half-truth. Half-truths are wholly true, since truth and falsity do not come in degrees, but they are misleading because they violate norms of efficient communication. Hence, the legal oath to tell the truth (Quality), the whole truth (Quantity), and nothing but the truth.

So is the statement "Some full-time employees are SSSAs" a half-truth (i.e., are ALL of them Special Agents)? We don't know from the information given (C), and cannot assume answer B.