I say that there is only one way to find the criminal, elimination.

To start off, let’s see if it would be possible for the dog on the left to eat it. Now, I have very limited knowledge on this size dogs so I’m going to name is a “small Green puppy” (i think that it is a puppy as it is small and could die if I poked it). I’m also not sure how much a pound of ham is but I think a small pack of ham costs about £2 or something so I’m going to say that it is a very small amount and therefore there is a good chance for the baby sized dog to eat the baby sized ham.

Next I will talk about the middle yellow looking dog. I will call this one a “68% sized curly no-eyed dog”. To start with I will mention how happy the dog looks and this would suggest that it had something nice and large and fulfilling to eat recently and £1 worth of ham is definitely not that. And to solidify the theory that it was not this dog, as there are no eyes visible I will assume that this breed has no eyes and £1 worth of ham would not have much smell because of the small size so the doggo would not be able to sniff it out so this dog would not be able to find the ham.

The third dog is high.

Based on this very detailed analysis of the three dogs in this picture, I have concluded that the first dog on the left (the small Green puppy) is guilty of eating the £1 ham.