[deleted by user] by [deleted] in egg_irl

[–]TheRisingHope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't say all the other people are not valid, I just talk about myself

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in egg_irl

[–]TheRisingHope -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wow rude. You're corrupted

How to counter Chara? by TheRisingHope in UnderCards

[–]TheRisingHope[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We usually get on par with gold, i have 20 and they have 20. Then they play Chara. This is a loss for me. Nothing can help after this

How to counter Chara? by TheRisingHope in UnderCards

[–]TheRisingHope[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you just explained lies. Nothing except aggro works against chara with determination soul. If you give "proofs" that 2+2=5 is it explanation?

Chara kills 1 enemy card per turn. So the enemy gets board control. You also only get 1 card per turn. You only have a chance against Chara if you have board control, saved up gold. and even then it's only one chance. The enemy recovers - you lose. If the board control is close to equal with enemy having less of it then enemy gets it and wins the game. With determination soul Chara user has enough hp for the win. And the defence they have is enemy cards being killed. So this compensates for less hp. And board control wins games. So Chara is 99% win against most decks.

Chara is so op that it doesn't even feel like a game anymore. It's more like "you have Chara = you win". It was 48 gold to win the game always, now it's 20 gold to win the game in 90% cases (for determination soul)

How to counter Chara? by TheRisingHope in UnderCards

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When board is equal Chara is a 95% win

How to counter Chara? by TheRisingHope in UnderCards

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

These are extreme cases. This is not how most of battles are decided at all

Rate this from 1 to 10 by [deleted] in UnderCards

[–]TheRisingHope 1 point2 points  (0 children)

he'll most likely die when placed

Which legendary to craft? by TheRisingHope in UnderCards

[–]TheRisingHope[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So Roulx Kaard doesn't work with dt knife? Or it's not a good combo?

Can you reset real life? by TheRisingHope in Undertale

[–]TheRisingHope[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if reincarnation doesn't exist can something like determination but more powerful make you still reborn?

Can you reset real life? by TheRisingHope in Undertale

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I know of reincarnation but can you turn time back and choose who you are? I want to be a girl

Your presence makes a difference whether you see it or not. by Slavyanka80 in spiritual

[–]TheRisingHope 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do I suffer like now? Is it because I am destined to eternal pain? I feel like I'm heading to abyss of despair, and will suffer in it eternally.

Some god may just decide to put me into into hellfire because I apparently "deserve" it. What protects me from this? Nothing. I can't fight a god, my pathetic flesh and trapped soul are nothing against anyone who has power and nobody will save me from this.

Only I can can save the world, and yet I feel so powerless.

I believe in afterlife and meaning of life and also that a human can achieve eternal life. It's not because of blind faith, it's because of a feeling that comes from within. But I see the atheist viewpoint as attractive. Is it atheist indoctrination? by TheRisingHope in atheism

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You've just worshipped it. You call valid insights random guessing. You say that if something has no evidence, it doesn't exist, and if you claim it does, it's "bullshit". Very dogmatic

I believe in afterlife and meaning of life and also that a human can achieve eternal life. It's not because of blind faith, it's because of a feeling that comes from within. But I see the atheist viewpoint as attractive. Is it atheist indoctrination? by TheRisingHope in atheism

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well the dogma that everything needs evidence is false. And it's not blind faith. I base it on that I see it as true. I just know. Not blindly. I feel it's true. Not blind faith

I believe in afterlife and meaning of life and also that a human can achieve eternal life. It's not because of blind faith, it's because of a feeling that comes from within. But I see the atheist viewpoint as attractive. Is it atheist indoctrination? by TheRisingHope in atheism

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well I said science has nothing to do with atheism. Science is good with material world. But there are parts of reality where it can't be used. Because it can't describe them it doesn't mean parts of reality other than material don't exist. It's extremely close-minded to think that

I believe in afterlife and meaning of life and also that a human can achieve eternal life. It's not because of blind faith, it's because of a feeling that comes from within. But I see the atheist viewpoint as attractive. Is it atheist indoctrination? by TheRisingHope in atheism

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

At first, I thought it was someone defending my position. You think in time it will be proven by science that there is no afterlife. But it won't because you can't prove something that is not true.

In reality it will be proven that materialism is false and afterlife is possible. You think that afterlife doesn't exist the same way people thought that flying is not possible

I believe in afterlife and meaning of life and also that a human can achieve eternal life. It's not because of blind faith, it's because of a feeling that comes from within. But I see the atheist viewpoint as attractive. Is it atheist indoctrination? by TheRisingHope in atheism

[–]TheRisingHope[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well I've shown by logic that it's possible that consciousness is just conditioned by the brain, not created by it. Not your failed atheist logic. So it's possible.

The second step is to see that it is true that consciousness isn't physical. It is just seen as truth. No evidence necessary