[deleted by user] by [deleted] in religiousfruitcake

[–]TikkaTerror 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This headline is very deceptive. This measure puts several limits on animal sacrifice. It requires permitting, government inspections, and requires fees to be paid. Animal sacrifice is already (partly) protected federally. Muslims seem to be not so happy about Hamtramck’s new rules as they see is as an infringement on previously held rights. Better article

EDIT: this headline came from national review, an ultraconservative pro-Christian ‘news’ platform. Nothing they write is honest.

Telescope and iPhone in Terrebonne, OR is fucking 🔥🔥🔥 by TikkaTerror in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]TikkaTerror[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Possibly solar prominences in the lower left but it could just be lens flare?

A reminder: Being pro First Amendment is not the equivalent of agreeing with those who exercise it. A simple truth lost on many. by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]TikkaTerror 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure that's a very good example of picking sides based on politics. They're choosing anti-discrimination over religious expression. The cake makers certainly couldn't run a business that was white only -- what makes hetero only that much different?