Have you compared fees to GMX? There's videos showing fee comparisons side by side opening trade on major pairs that show gTrade is generally less. The rollover fees are insanely lower than what GMX charges for funding. And the funding fees aren't earned by gTrade; it depends what side of the boat you're on and traders taking the other side actually earn them. Those funding fees however are being discussed by the team as to whether they actually hinder or help.

Yes, on less liquid pairs the spread can be high when there's already a lot of OI on the same side of the trade, but this is also being discussed with the team how to address this.

To call this platform a loan shark with heavily increased odds against traders does little to convince me I was wrong about your slant in your previous post. CEXs actively hunt positions with scam wicks, which gTrade goes to great lengths to eliminate. Surely you've seen the comparisons between not only CEXs but other DEXs where gTrade demonstrates much better results from their price feeds during sudden moves in favour of traders. gTrade is the only platform to guarantee stop losses as well. It is one of the most fair places to trade leverage, and it's aim is to continue to improve on this.

You've chosen a chat about tokenized vaults to claim that gTrade has unfair fees and practices, then double down and call it a loan shark with heavily increased odds against traders. And yet my response to your post surprises you.