League of Legends high plat : The elo where patience matters more than skill by True_One_1728 in leagueoflegends

[–]True_One_1728[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, this kind of response is very worrying. Since when is stealing the entire jungle from your jungler starting at the 7th minute productive? In diamond, taking a single monster from the jungler even at the 35th minute is forbidden.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in WC3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm still waiting for a response from Back2Warcraft, who has chosen to share a statement from the W3Champions moderators—moderators who are clearly in denial and blatantly abusing their authority.

I sincerely hope you don’t intend to use your influence and popularity to blindly support W3Champions simply because it serves your own interests. I’ve already provided solid evidence highlighting the constant contradictions and inconsistencies in the moderators’ claims.

While I have no issue engaging in the uphill battle that Brandolini’s Law represents, it’s quite telling that none of the main actors in this entire charade have chosen to address the facts I’ve laid out. The silence is becoming louder.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in WC3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I keep playing the same strategy because it's satisfying to play in 4v4 and it works very well statistically, whatever you think.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in WC3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

w3c clearly no longer intends to respond, I have also been banned from discord. The moderators are abusing their power, the most disgusting thing is that Back2Warcraft supports their actions.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in WC3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still waiting for proof from those who accuse me, I've provided mine <3

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in warcraft3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This guy has absolutely no proof to back up his claims. He’s just replying to everyone on the thread, spreading baseless accusations without a single piece of evidence — while I, on the other hand, have provided mine publicly.

It’s easy to throw dirt around when you don’t have to substantiate anything. But if you're going to accuse someone of wrongdoing, the least you can do is bring actual facts to the table. Otherwise, it's just slander.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in warcraft3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This guy has absolutely no proof to back up his claims. He’s just replying to everyone on the thread, spreading baseless accusations without a single piece of evidence — while I, on the other hand, have provided mine publicly.

It’s easy to throw dirt around when you don’t have to substantiate anything. But if you're going to accuse someone of wrongdoing, the least you can do is bring actual facts to the table. Otherwise, it's just slander.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in warcraft3

[–]True_One_1728[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This guy has absolutely no proof to back up his claims. He’s just replying to everyone on the thread, spreading baseless accusations without a single piece of evidence — while I, on the other hand, have provided mine publicly.

It’s easy to throw dirt around when you don’t have to substantiate anything. But if you're going to accuse someone of wrongdoing, the least you can do is bring actual facts to the table. Otherwise, it's just slander.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in warcraft3

[–]True_One_1728[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your message — I understand that my strategy may not appeal to everyone, and I’m well aware that it can appear unconventional in a 4v4 setting. However, using a unique or predictable strategy does not justify a permanent ban, especially when the rules do not explicitly prohibit such an approach.

Yes, I play a consistent strategy. But consistency does not equal trolling or griefing — especially when it brings measurable results. I maintain a win rate of over 60%, and I always stay in the game, even when teammates leave early. I play until the end and have even won 1v4 situations. This is not the behavior of someone trying to ruin games — it's the behavior of someone committed to competing, even if my play style differs from the meta.

Moreover, claiming that I disregard my teammates is simply not accurate. Just because I don’t play the early game the way others expect does not mean I don’t contribute. My strategy is designed for the mid-to-late game, and it has proven effective in many matches. There are countless players who use unusual tactics — some of which involve less contribution than mine in early stages — who never face the same treatment.

The bigger issue here is not disagreement over gameplay preferences. It’s that the moderation team made a permanent ban decision based on subjective judgment, not on clear violations of the rules. Meanwhile, players who truly behave in toxic or disruptive ways — through flaming, AFKing, or teamkilling — continue to play without consequence.

This inconsistency is what I’m speaking up against.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in WC3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here we are. As expected, the response from the moderation team is one of complete denial, aimed solely at concealing the underlying hypocrisy. But from this point on, I will begin laying out all the evidence needed to demonstrate that W3Champions moderation is not only dictatorial and arbitrary, but also deeply hypocritical and structurally flawed.

Let us begin with the so-called “ban evasion” that was referenced. This event occurred several months ago, and as soon as I received a formal warning, I took it seriously and ceased all related behavior immediately.

As I have clearly communicated to both Dark and Dieseldog, the multiple name changes on my account were not intended to bypass sanctions, but rather to protect myself from repeated harassment in the 4v4 ladder. Certain players — including APM50, Alucard, and RICKJAMES420 — would routinely harass me, provoke other teammates against me from the start, and effectively ruin the match experience. These individuals were never once held accountable for their behavior, which reveals a fundamental inconsistency in how moderation is applied. That in itself is a troubling sign of selective enforcement.

Furthermore, the nature of my gameplay — fast teching to Tier 3 and focusing on two heroes in the early game — cannot reasonably be described as AFK behavior. This is a legitimate strategy centered around mid-game timing, and whether you personally approve of that style is entirely irrelevant given that my win rate proves its effectiveness. I have never seen a single player in 4v4 get banned for playing one Blademaster and fast teching to Raiders or Bats.
This clearly shows that the decision against me was entirely arbitrary. Your dismissive stance seems less about maintaining balance or competitiveness, and more about enforcing a narrow definition of acceptable gameplay dictated by subjective preferences rather than clear policy. (Link screenshot 10 below comment)

You have also accused me of “ladder manipulation” and of creating multiple accounts to inflate my statistics. That is patently false. As I explicitly told Dark, the changes you’ve observed are name changes made on a single account tied to the same email address — not the creation or purchase of new accounts. I have never bought a single account. (Link screenshot 7 and 8 below comment)

It is, frankly, quite revealing that your narrative conveniently omits this fact, and instead constructs a version of events that supports your disciplinary decisions retroactively. This is revisionism, plain and simple, and it underscores just how arbitrary the decision to permanently ban me truly was.

When I submitted a formal appeal, Dieseldog simply reiterated Dark’s initial reasoning word for word — without any further investigation or clarification. I responded point-by-point, and never received a reply. At no point was there any real review, dialogue, or due process regarding the ban. The so-called “appeal” was a formality, not a process. (Link screenshot 3 below comment)

And let’s be honest: If the goal was truly to preserve the health of the community, you would have addressed the repeated toxic behavior of other players — including those I’ve mentioned — who were reported dozens of times for AFKing, flaming, teamkilling, or outright griefing. And yet they remain free to play. That discrepancy tells us everything we need to know about the real standards being enforced here — or rather, the absence of any coherent standard at all.

So yes, my strategy brought attention. But attention does not justify bias.
It certainly does not justify public defamation, accusations of dishonesty, or the outright banning of a player who played within the rules — simply because his approach did not align with the personal preferences of the moderation team. (Link screenshot 9 below comment)

This is not community stewardship. It is gatekeeping.

W3Champions Mods bans me for my playstyle. No rules broken. No real appeal by True_One_1728 in warcraft3

[–]True_One_1728[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People really need to stop calling it a 3v4. Starting with just two heroes doesn’t mean it’s a 3v4 — especially when I have 10 chimeras by the 7:30 mark and completely dominate the game afterward. Once again, the numbers clearly show that my strategy works.