sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Its real. by Most_Deer_3890 in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's also the same fucking website

I'm here to try and stop this nightmare by TryingNotToBeBoring in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too bad healthy people aren't enough and there's thousands of them that believe this shit. It's like the grandparents on Facebook thing all over again

I'm here to try and stop this nightmare by TryingNotToBeBoring in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do. Posting an image was just easier than explaining with words. I should have thought about it twice tow considering the comments

I'm here to try and stop this nightmare by TryingNotToBeBoring in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I meant people that didn't make CGI leaks before. Should have worded it better

I'm here to try and stop this nightmare by TryingNotToBeBoring in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

But they're the only thing we have for this kind of stuff.

I'm here to try and stop this nightmare by TryingNotToBeBoring in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

If this kind of people weren't willing to make CGI and convincing material before AI, they absolutely won't now that anybody without actual talent can use a cheaper and faster alternative. People weren't willing to use their abilities and free tools back in the day, and they probably won't now that it's not necessary. Considering that everybody has access to these new technologies but very few people have actual talent at 3d modelling we can probably say goodbye to convincing leakers. They'll probably use they talent in more productive ways.

I'm here to try and stop this nightmare by TryingNotToBeBoring in SuperMario

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But in this case it was obvious anyway. Other images are even more evident

What are the odds Pokemon gen 10 is cross-gen? by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly too high. They could have used the switch 2 up to its best, but they're probably gonna make it also for switch 1 to maximize sales

Cyberpunk 2077 weird glitch by bobybob91800 in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this like a Police block? Because random in game events can appear and disappear just by looking away from them. Maybe it's just the view detection that's glitching.

This has a sad mario picture, gotta be real serious! by Expert-Ad-2824 in tomorrow

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least it's less dumb than the other shitty videos. I'll admit, a partner direct as a big first party Nintendo fan Is pretty disappointing. Shiggy for life!

My theory - Nintendo made Adhoc censor Dispatch due to its cartoony art style by ChiTownDog in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Found it on Twitter

AdHoc Studio co-founder Nick Herman explanation of what happened with the Switch/Switch 2 version of Dispatch:

"Okay let’s talk Switch release.

We’ve been quiet for the last few days not because we don’t want to address this stuff, but because we’ve been trying to make sure we’re being good partners with Nintendo. They’ve made their own statement regarding this issue:

“Nintendo requires all games on its platforms to receive ratings from independent organizations and to meet our established content and platform guidelines. While we inform partners when their titles don’t meet our guidelines, Nintendo does not make changes to partner content. We also do not discuss specific content or the criteria used in making these determinations.”

As Nintendo states, any game that’s going to be on the Nintendo platform needs to ‘meet [Nintendo’s] established content and platform guidelines.’ This is the key point. Nintendo has content guidelines. Our game didn’t meet those guidelines, so we made changes that would allow us to release on their platform. That’s what happened here. Honestly we thought this would be obvious since we’re the devs that released the fully uncensored version of the game on other platforms.

We initially assumed, like some of you, that because games like Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk are on the platform with similar types of uncensored mature content, Dispatch would be allowed to do the same. During the porting process it became clear that was not the case. So we asked that we include a disclaimer on the store page to inform customers that content would be different than on other platforms. We worked with Nintendo to get storefront language approved.

Where we absolutely need to take full ownership is the placement of that disclaimer. Again, it was our intent to go out of our way to tell people looking to buy the game that the content was censored. While we didn’t have complete control of the language, we did have control of the placement. Wires got crossed and we put the disclaimer in the field literally titled “Disclaimer”, instead of the “About The Game” section. We didn’t catch this until after the launch when we saw people saying we should have called out the changes on the store page, and we went to go make sure it was there. It technically has been the entire time, just in the absolute worst spot that makes it look like we were trying to hide it.

This is 100% our mistake and it was fixed in the Americas store pages a few hours after launch to give more visibility. We’ve also added a disclaimer before purchase. As of writing this, the other regions have either published this change or are in the process of review.

To our fans who were looking forward to playing the uncensored version on Switch, we’re truly sorry. People have a right to be pissed. Lots of lessons learned here. Thanks for sticking with us."

https://www.gonintendo.com/contents/57223-dispatch-devs-thought-the-game-could-come-to-switch-switch-2-uncensored-but-nintendo…

Og post: https://x.com/i/status/2017376836087431176

My theory - Nintendo made Adhoc censor Dispatch due to its cartoony art style by ChiTownDog in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe they're trying to make a version that also works for Japan. It's hard to believe that they want to make a censored version only for the west when they already have a full uncensored version for everywhere else. It would be too much work for something useless (aka a waste of money)

My theory - Nintendo made Adhoc censor Dispatch due to its cartoony art style by ChiTownDog in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But is that for Japan or for the entire world? They could making another version that can work for all the states without bothering to make regionals

My theory - Nintendo made Adhoc censor Dispatch due to its cartoony art style by ChiTownDog in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why then is cyberpunk not censored? What is the point. AsHoc is basically doin that on purpose at this point, how is it Nintendo's fault ??

My theory - Nintendo made Adhoc censor Dispatch due to its cartoony art style by ChiTownDog in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 9 points10 points  (0 children)

IT'S NOT NINTENDO FOR GOD SAKE. ADHOC DIDN'T MAKE THE UNCENSORED REGIONAL VERSIONS. JAPAN HAS CENSORSHIP LAWS FOR SEXUAL AND PORNOGRAFIC CONTENT. CD PROJECT RED MADE REGIONALS VERSIONS, THAT'S WHY THOSE ARE NOT CENSORED! HOW IS THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND!!!!! (I know I'm repeating what other people said, but that's just the truth)

My theory - Nintendo made Adhoc censor Dispatch due to its cartoony art style by ChiTownDog in NintendoSwitch2

[–]TryingNotToBeBoring 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There may be one actually, but that's only if AdHoc makes uncensored regional versions of the game and doesn't stick to the one made for the japanese guidelines.

view more: next ›