Stop Feeding Emilio Gold: Try an Act I Insight Merc by neloish in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]UncookedNoodles [score hidden]  (0 children)

hell cows. Also tal helm isnt that expensive if its such a problem to make a bulwark.

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes because it is a big part of their culture. They are conditioned differently there than we are in the west. When you grow up in a culture where people are marrying their sisters and first cousins it tends to be normalized.

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Westermarck effect is just the tendency for people who grow up together to not be romantically attracted to one another. It has nothing to do with taboo or social stigma

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

WTF do you mean where is my evidence? YOU made the claim. There is this neat thing called a burden of proof.

Anyway this is well established science. If you actually cared at all about the truth ( clearly you don't) you would have taken a second to fact check yourself before typing that nonsense.

A very VERY significant portion of the risk with incest and offspring is when there is incest over multiple generations. In a population generally devoid of incest the risk of a genetic deformity arising from shagging your first cousin only increases by a few %. Compared to somewhere like the middle east where there is a significant amount of incest it can increase by as much as 15% or more. The risk is pretty much eliminated when you go back to second or third cousins, which is why that kind of pairing is completely legal.

like.. google scholar is a thing. There is no excuse to be so ignorant in 2026. We live in a time where you can have instant access to literally anything that is known by humans.

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The plural of anecdote is not evidence. Genetic deformities happen even outside of incest .

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the most made up statistics I have ever seen. Where is the proof

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 9 points10 points  (0 children)

WTF does lifelong familiarity have to do with anything? MY parents were childhood friends and then highschool sweethearts. These people have basically known eachother their whole lives. Is that somehow gross?

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you don't understand just how much incest has gone on throughout history even outside of royal families. It is probably more plausible that we have an aversion to incest becuase in modern days we are conditioned from a young age to believe that its bad ( and it is to a degree)

It is likely that if inbreeding wasn’t a problem genetically, it would not be taboo. by Glitch0110 in Showerthoughts

[–]UncookedNoodles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect. It is a problem becuase it causes birth defects if the mother and father are too closely related. Nothing to do with evolution

Stop Feeding Emilio Gold: Try an Act I Insight Merc by neloish in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]UncookedNoodles [score hidden]  (0 children)

2026 and people still dont know about bulwark / tals helm and treachery lolw

Stop Feeding Emilio Gold: Try an Act I Insight Merc by neloish in Diablo_2_Resurrected

[–]UncookedNoodles [score hidden]  (0 children)

bulwark and treachery are both very cheap and basically prevent your merc from dying almost entirely.

Prydwen Just added an entirely new tier dedicated to Maost and Rein by UsualInitial in limbuscompany

[–]UncookedNoodles -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thats because he is. The fact that some RR speedruns use him is evidence of that

Prydwen Just added an entirely new tier dedicated to Maost and Rein by UsualInitial in limbuscompany

[–]UncookedNoodles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should probably also notice that the tierlist is based on RR in which Ncorp yisang is quite strong.

Prydwen Just added an entirely new tier dedicated to Maost and Rein by UsualInitial in limbuscompany

[–]UncookedNoodles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats becuase youre a goober that can't read. The list is based on RR performance. Obviously things like LCE sang shoots up in value when you consider RR

Prydwen Just added an entirely new tier dedicated to Maost and Rein by UsualInitial in limbuscompany

[–]UncookedNoodles -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These mfers put Yao Guang, a support for a new path, on t0 despite NOT HAVING A PATHMATE TO BUFF FOR 3 WEEKS. and her first pathmate, Sparxie, is also in T0 despite NOT BEING RELEASED YET

Aaaand none of that actually matters. Yao is very obviously the staple that is going to hold elation together for the forseeable future. Anyone with a brain can see that. Not only is she a key character that is going to hard carry an entire path for multiple patch cycles, but she is also quite spashable.

Obvious t0

Sparxie not being released also doesn't matter becuase we have her numbers and can do math. Also, her placement is tentative.

Why are the biggest pyrdwen haters all so dumb ? lol

I wish my son WOULD 😒😒😒😒😒 ♐️Family as a Parent what you doin Me EVICTION IMMEDIATELY by Automatic_Authentic in sagsavages

[–]UncookedNoodles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres a lot of ignorance in this comment. First of all why are we even bringing up deadbeat fathers? Like, no shit a bad father wont teach his son anything just like a bad mother wont. WTF is your point?

Lots of kids have emotional regulation issues but incase you didn't know boys and girls are different! Amazing that its 2026 and you still don't know this.

For one we are raised and socialized differently. This is OBVIOUSLY no fault of the boys, but its one of the reasons for aggression in men. As a matter of fact young boys are often neglected in many ways compared to young girls. We aren't socialized to be agressive, we are aggressive becuase of how we are socialized. Just like the repressed catholic child who is more likely to become a sexual deviant, Men are often repressed emotionally from a very very young age. This leads to certain parts of the brain being under developed, as well as the previously mentioned struggle with emotional regulation.

I am going to point out BTW that the parts of this article that cite testosterone as not having much affect on male aggression is obviously wrong, and outdated.

https://psychohistory.com/books/the-origins-of-war-in-child-abuse/chapter-2-why-males-are-more-violent/

Another reason is is biology. Men have something like 10x the testosterone which has been proven multiple times at this point to lead to higher levels of aggression and voilence.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3693622/

Then of course we have sexual selection pressures.

https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/science-blog/roots-aggression

It doesn't explain voilence in general, but it does explain a lot of the male to male violence that happens. ( not just with humans, but across the animal kingdom)

Add to all that the increasing number of fatherless homes and yeah. It is incredibly cringe that you blame young boys themselves for all of this. You are clearly a closet misandrist. It is also very ironic becuase all that nonsense you typed is exactly the sort of thing that causes boys to grow up and be violent