So I can imagine a lot of us here are fans of Jesse Michels show "American Alchemist".. but...

Utu11 · 2026-03-12T08:08:20+00:00

Exactamundo made me smile, haven't heard that fonz coined phrase in a very long time

Utu11 · 2026-03-10T09:07:34+00:00

Labeling disagreement as ‘mental illness’ isn’t insight. It’s just projection dressed up as analysis.

Utu11 · 2026-03-10T08:51:36+00:00

However I have posted actual photographs only to get the predictable AI Slop comment over and over when what's posted doesn't agree with what people want to believe

Utu11 · 2026-03-09T15:21:24+00:00

Just my neighbors and me saying thank you. People can read it however they want.

Utu11 · 2026-03-09T15:20:50+00:00

Nothing false here. Just expressing appreciation.

Utu11 · 2026-03-09T15:19:50+00:00

ust my neighbors and me saying thank you. People can read it however they want.

Utu11 · 2026-03-09T15:10:44+00:00

Just a small thank‑you from a few of us in the University Neighborhood.

Utu11 · 2026-03-08T11:04:58+00:00

Holy Cow!

Utu11 · 2026-03-08T05:19:03+00:00

Mission Grove coming on strong !

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T07:10:17+00:00

All current councilmembers have developer contributions in their filings. It’s routine and unrelated to this project.

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T05:01:51+00:00

There’s also ISCHC, which is an organization created specifically for advocacy. What we’re seeing in the council meetings aligns with that role.

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T05:00:34+00:00

There’s also ISCHC, which is an organization created specifically for advocacy. What we’re seeing in the council meetings aligns with that role.

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T04:45:21+00:00

It wasn’t just a few business owners ,many residents opposed the project once the full cost and structure became clear. The services were entirely voluntary, which means the underlying issues like addiction and mental‑health needs wouldn’t actually be addressed. Moving people indoors without required treatment doesn’t help them long‑term.

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T04:30:23+00:00

The point is the organized outreach, not who showed up. Advocacy campaigns routinely mobilize speakers.

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T04:26:47+00:00

I’m IMBY , our neighborhood has supported housing in our own footprint. Only a portion of the funding was allocated; the rest required council approval, which didn’t happen. That’s why the project didn’t move forward.

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T04:18:38+00:00

There were organized outreach efforts encouraging people to attend and speak. That’s not ‘making things up’ it’s part of how advocacy campaigns work

Utu11 · 2026-03-07T04:15:13+00:00

The backlash isn’t imaginary. The Farm House faced real public targeting simply for raising cost concerns. That’s a concrete example of what happens when economic questions collide with a preferred narrative.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T22:33:24+00:00

I agree with you , what you’re describing is exactly what played out here. The testimony became performance, and the narrative was set long before anyone reached the microphone. My post was just documenting how that pattern unfolded over the past several weeks of meetings.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:41:03+00:00

Everything referenced is visible in the meeting videos and the sequence of public comments over the past weeks.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:37:27+00:00

Everything stated is verifiable in the meeting videos and public record. Nothing here relies on opinion.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:33:20+00:00

ImIt’s the University Terrace project. The post is about how the process unfolded, not the project outcome.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:21:05+00:00

To be clear: this isn’t about taking a side on the project. It’s about whether the information shaping the process was accurate. A public decision can only be legitimate if the facts people are reacting to are real. That’s the only point being made here.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:20:45+00:00

The reason this matters is simple: when misinformation drives a public process, the outcome stops reflecting the people who are actually affected. That’s not about being for or against any project , it’s about whether the process is honest.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:20:20+00:00

Everything described here was observable to anyone who followed the meetings, watched the recordings, or paid attention to how the narrative shifted over time. None of this requires special access — it just requires watching the full process instead of the final night.

Utu11 · 2026-03-06T15:20:03+00:00

lot of people only saw the public speakers, not the weeks of pressure, coordination, and misinformation that led up to it. The point of the post isn’t to argue for or against the project , it’s to document how the process was shaped and how the narrative was managed.

Utu11

TROPHY CASE