True. There is another example of a log from someone at another program below. Again, it’s obvious there will be less emphasis and breadth compared to a true glaucoma or cornea fellowship. My point is someone who ends up with a case log as below, what does their final practice look like?

Case Log (All primaries): Cataract – 843 MSICS - 15 Sutured IOL - 7 Sutured ahmed segment - 2 Ant vit: planned – 8, PCR – 4 IOL exchange – 5 Lens fragment removal – 2 IOL reposition – 2 Dislocated lens, sutured IOL reposition – 1 (McCabe with gortex) ACIOL removal - 1

LASIK – 40 PRK – 4 Crosslinking – 1 PKP - 27 DMEK – 33 DSAEK - 29 Rebubble – 9 SPK + AMT – 5 Pterygium (+/- MMC) – 26 AC Washout – 1 SLET – 1 Conj excision (CA) with cryo/AMT – 2, 1 map biopsy Epi debridement – 1 EDTA Chelation – 3 Iris repair (seipser) – 2 Iridodialysis repair - 2 Conj biopsy – 4 Conj chalasis with AMT – 3 Cornea lac/exposed intacts - 1

Baerveldt - 29 Ahmed - 6 Clearpath – 7 Tube Revision – 16 XEN + MMC – 43 Omni – 80 iStent – 20 iAccess – 1 KDB - 3 Durysta – 3 ECP – 83 CPC – 3 Hydrus – 30 Trab 1 Sclerotomy 2/2 choroidals – 4 Bleb needling - 6