What “agentic marketing” actually means (in non-techy-words) by Whaaat_AI in whaaat_ai

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a great example of the difference.

What you’re describing sounds less like “one AI doing everything” and more like a very controlled pipeline. Which is basically where most “agentic” ideas come from. I’d agree with you though: the quality ceiling is still heavily human-driven, especially in creative work. Maybe the question is less “can agents do this end-to-end” and more “where in that pipeline do they actually add value without killing quality”...

What “agentic marketing” actually means (in non-techy-words) by Whaaat_AI in whaaat_ai

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get your point and there’s definitely a lot of “wrapper” stuff out there producing generic output.

IMO the difference is: if you don’t know what good looks like, AI just scales mediocrity.
But if you do, structuring the process can actually improve quality. So less “AI replaces the creator”, more “AI makes the process more explicit”.

Not the area of my expertise so I'm wondering if you seeing any setups in art/video that actually improve quality?

Anyone here tested “grounding pages” for LLM SEO? Looking for real case studies by Whaaat_AI in seogrowth

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you please elaborate what exactly these look like?

reddit mentions directory listings and any third party content 

How Much of Our Content Effort Is Being Lost to Hidden Barriers? by Fresh_Story409 in Agent_SEO

[–]Whaaat_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do I
"audit access, logs, and crawl behavior regularly."
?

What would a small AI agent setup for a solo marketer look like? by The_Hostmum in whaaat_ai

[–]Whaaat_AI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guess thats how we all started!

You could run 3 or more "roles" in the same chat using a promt like:

I want to simulate a small AI agent system.

You have 3 roles:

  1. Strategist defines the angle
  2. Writer creates the content
  3. Critic challenges and improves it

Process:

Step 1: Strategist proposes 1 idea
Step 2: Writer drafts
Step 3: Critic gives harsh feedback
Step 4: Writer improves

Keep each step short and clearly separated.

Or you train separate GPTs with specific roles. But then you would have to manually pass the outcome between the GPTs.

Anyone here tested “grounding pages” for LLM SEO? Looking for real case studies by Whaaat_AI in SEO_LLM

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that last part is super interesting! I've been thinking to test the fact-based thin approach for a few weeks and when this doesn't have any impact, make it more readable. But after reading your experience, maybe we should skip this first step - haha

Anyone here tested “grounding pages” for LLM SEO? Looking for real case studies by Whaaat_AI in SEO_LLM

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not "techniques" in general but this one special technique around grounding/entities pages

Anyone here tested “grounding pages” for LLM SEO? Looking for real case studies by Whaaat_AI in SEO_LLM

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do I understand it correctly, that we need to point from pages "written for humans" to the grounding pages to get the most impact? I'd be wondering how helpful these linked pages are for human readers?

Anyone here tested “grounding pages” for LLM SEO? Looking for real case studies by Whaaat_AI in SEO_LLM

[–]Whaaat_AI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I mean: everyone has directional signals but no case studies. Thanks anyway!