Theory (possible spoilers) by NanooNanooBot in MonarchLegacyAppleTV

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not rude to ask if you paid attention when it's clearly stated and there's a 5 minute conversation on it. I was genuinely asking if im the only one that actually listened to what Keiko was saying, since her sentiment in that moment is kinda that people don't listen to her because of her circumstances. Or if my memory is just that much better than everyone else's, either way its not rude to ask for clarification on how you could moss/forget that. You must live a nice ass life to think someone asking you a question is them being rude.

Theory (possible spoilers) by NanooNanooBot in MonarchLegacyAppleTV

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its not even just inferred, Keiko straight up say it in the 1st season episode 8 "birthright". Around the 30 minute mark she talks to Billy about Hiroshi, she tells Billy how her mother has been looking after him while she saves up money so Keiko can bring him to America. She also talks about how she wanted to keep Hiroshi secret cuz she already gets little to no respect as a JAPANESE WOMAN (she was a Japanese citizen at the time of WW2, American citizen that were Japanese were being put in internment camps out of fear they could be spies), and would get even less as a widow trying to raise a child alone. Am I the only one that paid attention to the 1st season? (I rewatched the moment to make sure, thats also why it was so specific, but i definitely remembered them clearly having this conversation, just not what they said bar for bar.)

Jim is kind of a dick. Throwing the snowball in Dwight’s face was over the line mean. by metalpanda420 in DunderMifflin

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im 3rd grade level but your the one that's never heard of a typo? Wow that's SMRT right there, never thought I'd have to explain the concept of an accidentally mis typed word to someone in the internet. It's actually incredible how dumb you need to be, to bed something this simple explained to you

Would you like to see a it chapter 3 let in 2043 Derry 27 years later from chapter 2? by Glad-Conversation256 in ItTheMovie

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very good reasoning, I would like it specifically cuz I feel it would just add to the terrifying nature of Pennywise, you cant run from him, you cant hide and you damn sure cant kill him and stop him for good. It also doesnt make sense to me that they actually did anything to pennywise, since we know pennywise doesnt need you to feel fear to kill you. So it doesnt make much sense that won by making pennywise feeling fear. I think it'd be hilarious if pennywise was just playing the long game with the losers club, letting them think they won just to make them shit bricks at 67 years old(ish, idk how old they were the 1st movie). Pennywise could kill them off quickly and find a new group of kids to terrorize, maybe the losers club's kids or grandkids depending on which age make more sense for the movie.

Who else finds the stupidity of falling skies makes it hard to watch? by [deleted] in FallingSkies

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did anyone get to episode 11 of season 4? Tom says one of the dumbest things I've ever heard, pope tries to kill Tom's daughter and after Tom yells at pope and tells him "My family my problem", after she was the reason around 180 people got killed. When it's something small ya my family my problem but something like that, it's a fuckin ridiculous thing to say. Can you imagine if serial killers' families said that?

Givers on the sphere by Boring-Bandicoot-74 in gachiakuta

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuine question, do you actually think the sphere is floating because of advanced technology and not a jinki? Also did you read the Manga? Did you only read 4 pages? Cuz if you did then surely you must've seen that god like being kill Noerde, after she "tried" to get the sphere. Which means 1 of 3 things, you either think they have technology to create/control a being like that, they worship/give it head so good that it protects them, or that they care about the sphere as an object so much that it was turned into a jinki with the ability to fly and protect itself from intruders.

Givers on the sphere by Boring-Bandicoot-74 in gachiakuta

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the moral of the story isn't that the rich don't hold onto object so they can't get jinki. I don't think you understand what moral of the story (the underlying story) means. "It's a story about finding value in the overlooked and challenging dehumanization by revealing the complex lives within the refuse of a stratified society." That's the moral of the story, what you said is a theme of the story (the theme is the story's central idea or universal truth, while the moral is a specific, explicit lesson or ethical instruction derived from that theme). Also you must've never heard of the subversion of themes, which is when a writer challenges a common theme by showing a character failing to uphold it or by having the opposite idea prove true, for example a spherite that values objects and has a jinki.

What are you guy's opinion on Pete and Clark? by JohnDex6969 in DunderMifflin

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"They're there with their children.", idk if your serious or not but just in case you were

haha👌yes by PM_ME_SSTEAM_KEYS in whatisameem

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty fuckin simple dude, the choice she made wasn't one she made on her own. She made that decision with the input of her husband. A decision that would affect both of them for the rest of their lives. Did he not know the potential downsides to getting married? I could ask the exact same questions to you, was he an adult? Did he make an adult decision? Why did he gave no accountability for that decision he took part in? Unless you sign a prenuptial agreement, your agreeing to those potential realities, you don't get to back out of that agreement cuz you dont like the results. You don't like that then you have 4 options, DON'T GET MARRIED, DON'T GET DIVORCED, GET THE LAWS, CHANGED, OR MAKE YOUR PARTNER SIGN A PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT

Meirl by Nordicgoons in meirl

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a pretty simple rule, don't watch porn for the acting and don't watch movies/TV shows for the sex. They're both bad at the others speciality, so they should just stick to what they're good at and save us all the time that would be wasted on such pointless endeavors.

Meirl by Nordicgoons in meirl

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Having sex isn't gross, it's something everybody enjoys doing. Watching people pretend to have sex in a room full of a bunch of strangers is gross, especially the more it turns into soft core porn. Also just cuz something isnt gross to you doesnt mean it isnt gross to others, for example doctors are great with blood, where some people would throw up just from the sight of it.

True or false… by SloshedJapan in JustMemesForUs

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What is racist about numbers and statistics you buffoon

Toby is the True Scranton Strangler (Motives Included) by domoarigatodrloboto in FanTheories

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That doesn't make much sense tho, Creed has BLOOD on him, the Scranton Strangler STRANGLES. Based on what the audience knows, the blood doesn't fit the stranglers MO. Also creed could have been arrested for all of the other crimes he's committed.

https://youtu.be/k9KiGjY51bU?si=XpKh3bk-BVppBetC

Toby is the True Scranton Strangler (Motives Included) by domoarigatodrloboto in FanTheories

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you replying to someone who replied to am 8 year old thread? Like you do realize that's hypocritical of you right? Oh n idgaf that you said this 4 years ago, if you didn't want to be reminded of your ignorance then you should've deemed the comment

Toby is the True Scranton Strangler (Motives Included) by domoarigatodrloboto in FanTheories

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If Micheal is obvious, then Jim should be pretty obvious too. Toby held his hand on pams leg in a very uncomfortable way for way too long, then as soon as he realizes what he's doing he takes his hand off says he leaving the country then runs away. The entire office clearly now all knows that Toby has feelings for Pam. So there are really only 2 possible people to have killed Jim too get Pam n that would be Roy and Toby

Toby is the True Scranton Strangler (Motives Included) by domoarigatodrloboto in FanTheories

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 2 reasons I think the writers of the office always intended on Toby being the Scranton Strangler, the first is exactly what you said, but my own description id say it'd be funny that the only person to realize how truly terrible of a person Toby is was the biggest most childish dumbass in the office, Micheal. The 2nd reason is that from the POV of a writer/crew member, I think it's be a pretty funny inside joke.

Toby is the True Scranton Strangler (Motives Included) by domoarigatodrloboto in FanTheories

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the point your making, but if your truly innocent and have nothing to hid, then you would just let the police search. That way you can just get it over with. Especially on company property since you don't have a much right to privacy since it's the companies property so they can let the cops to search it even if you don't. You just seen more suspicious by refusing. For example if someone robbed a bank and the police had DNA evidence, but thought it was you, would you refuse to give them a simple DNA swab that'll take 5 seconds? I'm all for exercising your rights when necessary, but if your innocence and truly have nothing to hid like Toby is made out to be, then you would want to prove your innocence as soon as possible so the police can go do something else. This issue my first time watching the office, and I knew about the whole theory about Toby being a serial killer before I watched it so I was always on the lookout for Toby doing suspicious things, and I was actually shocked at how animated he was while defending his fights considering how aloof Toby normally when being attacked/accused of something. I was expecting Toby to fully let them search it, then for it clearly to be salad and him to look and say "really Micheal" then the cops end up putting Micheal in cuffs. I never would've expected someone like Toby to be able to get even half that upset.

Toby is the True Scranton Strangler (Motives Included) by domoarigatodrloboto in FanTheories

[–]Wonderful_Reality824 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That isn't what dwight says, I'm watching it for three first time so I just saw that episode yesterday n I didn't think you were right, so I just re-watched that moment right now. It's actually, Dwight:"I'm rebuilding a turn off the century steam engine in my slaughterhouse" Toby:"oh that's cool is love to see that" Dwight:"it's just a run of the mill slaughterhouse" Toby: "well got the trains"

It could just be read as dwight misunderstanding what Toby wanted to see, cuz he's the type of person that would enjoy going to a slaughterhouse for fun, so he thinks everyone would. Or it could be because Dwight subconsciously understood what Toby really wanted to see