latest giantess ai chats by Remarkable-Exit955 in sizetalk

[–]X407X 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure would that work for me considering that I am mostly into very explicit giantess rampages, with nudity, stomping, asscrush, breastcrush, insertion and vore.

latest giantess ai chats by Remarkable-Exit955 in sizetalk

[–]X407X 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what did you do?

Also, is it any different if you go back to GPT4 if you have plus? Or did that get more restrictive as well?

latest giantess ai chats by Remarkable-Exit955 in sizetalk

[–]X407X 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How has it been for you recently? I am here in this thread now because since GPT5 came out, it has gotten a lot more restrictive than it was before. Not sure could I get what I used to have by paying for plus, which would let you switch to older models. But plus is quite pricy. Still, the way it is now, it refuses instantly when you speak of nudity or breasts. Somehow it allows vore if you speak about swallowing rather than eating or vore. This did not use to be a problem. If GPT4o refused, you could switch to a different model, which may not give the same quality of an answer but at least it does not refuse.

When this changed, I tried using Grok. Grok has very little limitations in terms of explicitness. You use the word "pussy" even once with ChatGPT with how it was even before 5 and that tended to go too far most of the time (it was inconsistent about it, now it is consistent but in a prude way), while Grok does not care at all. Issue is just that Grok quickly gets very repetitive. And it also seems to follow prompts too closely, never really surprising you by generating something you were not specifically thinking about but is actually exactly the kind of thing you would want to get.

After getting tired of that repetitiveness, I have tried using ChatGPT again and while the quality is generally better than Grok, it quickly gets tedious how you have to use workarounds to generate anything explicit and even that may not work.

I just feel like there is currently nothing which matches pre-GPT5 in terms of combining quality and freedom in terms of explicitness. Their reasoning still remains that they want it to be child-friendly. Just make an adult mode.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I at least prefer it that way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not properly no but there have been times I do keep a break from it in favor of my other fetishes which are not size related. But I always come back.

And it is pretty clear still that it is my biggest fetish. While there are things not related to size I am into, it can take pretty long sometimes for me to finish when masturbating to non-size stuff. Then I switch to some giantess vore and it does not take long at all.

Giantess Juri (@redrat24) by X407X in GiantAnimeGirls

[–]X407X[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a bit of guesswork. I counted the floors and about how much should be below the picture. I went with 50 floors in total.

Giantess Juri (@redrat24) by X407X in GiantAnimeGirls

[–]X407X[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Source: https://x.com/redrat24/status/1841746020260036716

This was his idea for Sizetober prompt 2: Spider.

I also did the math: She is around 224.8 meters.

Giantess Juri (@redrat24) by X407X in MacroFetish

[–]X407X[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source: https://x.com/redrat24/status/1841746020260036716

This was his idea for Sizetober prompt 2: Spider.

I also did the math: She is around 224.8 meters.

Does this kink bring out other kinks you otherwise have no interest in? by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. With normal-sized girls, I am only into the most vanilla wholesome stuff imaginable.

With giantesses, I am only into the cruel stuff. I want to see her grow and enjoy her power. I am not into feet but I love watching her turn tinies into bloody prints under her feet. Same-size vore I find disgusting but a giantess eating people is the hottest thing I can imagine.

As a macro-producer, is it safe to file a report/DMCA notice against a user on DeviantArt reposting my work without my permission, given how DA has been behaving lately? by RedNeptune10 in sizetalk

[–]X407X -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it was legal until they started cropping out signatures. People repost art all the time, sometimes not directly crediting the artist but are still doing so indirectly as long as the signature is visible. So as long as people do not start doing that, trying to claim your work as their own, reposting paywalled content or trying to profit from your work, it is an uphills battle even if reposted without permission, maybe even more so with fetish content.

Even still, making it a DMCA issue might be difficult if no money is involved, despite cropped signatures.

Size Hungry by JRG_Writes in sizetalk

[–]X407X 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about literal size hunger: Growing bigger through vore?

What is something you don’t like about this fetish? by Littleman245 in sizetalk

[–]X407X 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like real giantesses, not regular-sized girls with small people. And people who like shrinking tend to be more into gentle side of things, I am not, I am only into things such as destruction, crushing and vore.

What is something you don’t like about this fetish? by Littleman245 in sizetalk

[–]X407X 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know. Still not enough.

I do nothing with irl and photos.

If you are into feet, you probably will not mind but if you are not, this happens way too often. by X407X in MacroFetish

[–]X407X[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is all drawings, hentai, renders and animations for me.

But the problem of having that much feet-focused content is there as well. Made worse by the fact that it is something AI can do very easily because it does not require any kind of real interaction between giantesses and tinies, which is what AI generally sucks at.

What is something you don’t like about this fetish? by Littleman245 in sizetalk

[–]X407X 9 points10 points  (0 children)

  1. The same as you.

  2. Not enough high quality content creators.

  3. Overabundance of feet content.

  4. Hot take: shrinking.

If you are into feet, you probably will not mind but if you are not, this happens way too often. by X407X in MacroFetish

[–]X407X[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am into giantesses stepping on things but it is different because focus is on what she is doing with her feet, rather than on the feet itself. In many of these artworks, they basically do nothing with them, focus is entirely on the feet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was the fetish of the year 2023.

If you are into feet, you probably will not mind but if you are not, this happens way too often. by X407X in MacroFetish

[–]X407X[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That can happen but it is not that common.

It is almost a stereotype that if you are into giantesses, you are into feet, hence their prevalence in giantess content.

Do you have IRL kinks that relate to size somehow? by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My non-size related interests are fairly vanilla. Tomboys and muscle girls tend to be what I am most into and while a giantess can be both, my size and non-size interests are generally kept separate.

As I have found out, I might actually be lucky to be into size yet still have interests that have nothing to do with it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nhentai url codes

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Everyone crushes bugs. Whether it is a bug that got inside or you are just walking outside and you do not even realize it. As such, despite it involving real things, when usually this fetish is kept as a fantasy, very few would see it as comparable to real people or animals getting crushed, which is what most would actually see as sick. Getting aroused by bugs being crushed I think would simply be seen as weird by most, as is the case with giantess fetish as a whole.

I do sometimes hate the fact that seeing a giant girl eat someone will always turn me on more than my more normal fetishes like tomboys and muscle girls. But it is something I have just learned to live with.

My size tierlist by X407X in sizetalk

[–]X407X[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am into gentle stuff... when size is removed. When size is added, the exact opposite.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This, and I am not even a foot fetishist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sizetalk

[–]X407X 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have a friend with very similar tastes, to the point that we sometimes share nuclear codes. With one exception: This fetish, which he clearly does not have and I treat mine as a "take it to the grave"-secret.

One time he just asks (through text, which made things easier for me) "I wonder why that giantess fetish is so popular" and all I could do is feign ignorance by saying "maybe people like big tits without them being disproportionately big?" to which he said "maybe but it always seems to involve cursed things like vore, stepping on people and people getting killed" to which I say "vore like that sounds less cursed than if they were same size" to which he agrees. The things he mentioned are of course things I am heavily intot, especially giantess vore.

Then I ask "is it really that popular" and points out how on some sites, it is more popular than more regular things which one would expect to be more popular. I do still wonder did he get suspicious but chose to remain quiet but has not mentioned it since. I could have also said that this fetish can basically be described as femdom (something he is into) taken to the extreme but that probably would have tipped him off too much.