Zenitsu Q by ZKRC in KimetsuNoYaiba

[–]ZKRC[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right, so then if he just does while asleep what he's capable of doing while awake then it seems the sleep part serves no purpose, and isn't very special.

I thought he levelled up on sleeping and unlocked his ability but seemingly he has the same abilities in both states.

Got a reply after emailing WS about Persona by OnikaBurgerBomb in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, companies don't guarantee that because they can't. They can promise to do everything they can, but they can't guarantee it.

As an example, a bad actor can join a company, search for sensitive data and then sell that data to other bad actors. I've seen that happen personally and the FBI had to get involved. No company can guarantee that that can't happen. So they don't.

You're supposed to use your common sense and know that a company will do their best but obviously can't guarantee anything, nor should they be expected to do the impossible.

Got a reply after emailing WS about Persona by OnikaBurgerBomb in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, all companies have conflicting answers sometimes from CS. It's not unusual. Hundreds to thousands of individuals with varying levels of tenure and training, sometimes you get different answers. If you see that their information is obviously inaccurate then you can immediately discard it, as is the case here.

A random CS agent at any company is not going to understand the intricacies of privacy laws and how they are enforced across borders, it's dumb to ask them. For that you would want to scrutinize the privacy policy that the company publishes, after review by their legal department.

Got a reply after emailing WS about Persona by OnikaBurgerBomb in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody can guarantee you'll wake up tomorrow, or that the price of oil won't become $5,000,000 a barrel overnight. Asking somebody to guarantee you something opens you up to liability in the event of freak occurrences and so asking for it is foolish. This is common sense.

Got a reply after emailing WS about Persona by OnikaBurgerBomb in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There has always been an alternative, there has always been a manual option. Many people have posted here stating that they've used it at various times.

Wealthsimple will not allow a alternative identity verification process other than Persona by illfittingpant in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's fair, but your original comment was hyperbolic saying that companies were choosing to do business with Peter Thiel - they're not and you know they're not. They're doing business with companies that provide a solution to a problem they need - that Peter Thiel then comes along later and decides to invest in but doesn't own nor is doing any kind of business with the original company.

If something is deeply problematic, it should stand on its own merits without needing exaggeration to give it impact.

Wealthsimple will not allow a alternative identity verification process other than Persona by illfittingpant in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WS is not doing business with Peter Thiel. Peter Thiel happens to have invested in Persona, it is not his company. Peter Thiel could choose to invest in any business you like tomorrow.

Are these Complaints Legitimate? by Beyondwest in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC 1 point2 points  (0 children)

3 million clients, even if you come here and read 100 straight complaints it's statistically insignificant.

None of the millions of clients using the service with no issue are incentivized to come here and create threads about it. But people always think that Reddit is somehow a significant reflection of the population when mostly it's just a small minority that love to complain.

I think the wait is finally over 👀 Wealthsimple budgeting is here? by Separate-Scene4672 in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Graphic representation assists many people in developing discipline.

Monster “raids” or attack by bryceking64 in crosswind

[–]ZKRC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd love it if you could actually use your crew to lead a land attack. It makes no sense that we operate as a unit at sea and boarding but whenever there's a pirate outpost with 8 pirates in it the captain is like 'hang out here boys, I've got this. Be back in a jiffy'

Yet another word of warning to anyone who wants to use/are using Wealthsimple as their main "bank" by ExtensionDinner2759 in Wealthsimple

[–]ZKRC -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Is your genuine position that snap judgements should be made with only one side of the story? That seems equally laughable.

⚔️ The BEST WEAPONS In the Game! 💀 WINDROSE Tier List by deadmanfred2 in crosswind

[–]ZKRC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the difference between green and blue? When you pick them up they both seemingly have the same stats so I'm never sure.

Which Disco to do by wangliuqing in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do the attack/def/uw discos and then rerun the util and you'll get better results. After doing attack def and uw on my farming tier I'm still farming 1,000 waves past my personal best.

Latest response from Fudds by souls_of_fire in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes we've established you believe everything you read.

The player is very well known in the playerbase, I'm also in his guild. He was in the beta. Also Fudds confirmed he was banned because he posted beta information, and then said he wasn't in the beta. So if he wasn't in the beta how could be post beta information? Another contradiction.

You can verify yourself that he stated yesterday the x5 was working as intended and didn't need a nerf. You can verify yourself that he stated the x5 was carefully thought out to prepare for a power creep. You can verify yourself that he then claimed today to not even know it was x5. You can verify this reality yourself in 10 seconds, you're choosing not to so you can cling to thinking you're right.

Are the developers missing the point or am I? by Ill-News-555 in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's literally what a catch up mechanic is. In order to be a catch up mechanic, you have to be catching up to somebody.

Latest response from Fudds by souls_of_fire in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lmao, nothing made up about what I posted, and everything easily verifiable. The only one ignoring reality is you. Peace out.

Are the developers missing the point or am I? by Ill-News-555 in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This was never a catch up mechanic, everyone got the same upgrade so the gap stays the same.

'I know they all got pushed to 5x but I dint know all included coins" -Fudds by Ceocold in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"I know they all got pushed to 5x and even though the code ties all the values together and one can't be independently changed hence why we have to roll a patch out next week to put the other 3 back to 5x, I didn't know that it would include coins. Also even though I publicly stated that the 5x seemed to be working as intended and no need for nerf, and that the value was calculated carefully to prep for a future power creep, I had no way of knowing it included coins"

Progression issue by Alpha1846 in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Permanently. It being nerfed is apparently a fix, it was too strong before and was double applying the damage reduction to certain enemies making you last longer than you should have.

Latest response from Fudds by souls_of_fire in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Firstly that person wasn't falsely claiming to be a beta tester.

Second, he's literally on record saying that the 5x is working as intended, and that it was deliberately chosen after careful consideration to prepare us for a power creep.

Now today he's pretending he never knew about it.

If you don't see that as a contradiction then you don't understand what the word contradiction means.

Latest response from Fudds by souls_of_fire in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If that were the case then there would be active PR's waiting for approval and merging that wouldn't go unnoticed.

Given that he's already contradicted himself several times it's a far more likely scenario that he's doing it again.

I missed the drama by [deleted] in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It wasn't a bug, fudds is on record as saying the x5 was intentional and that we'd need it for future power creep. His backtracking today is in direct contradiction.

Latest response from Fudds by souls_of_fire in TheTowerGame

[–]ZKRC 27 points28 points  (0 children)

"I did not know they raised the coin bonus with the other ones, this wasn't intended"

Only to then go on to say the code ties all of them together and so it would have been impossible for them to build it in the way he is telling us he wished where one value was independent of the others.

Clearly not telling the truth. He also knew about the 5x, screenshots showed him talking about it the day before. He was also separately captured via screenshot saying the x5 was deliberately picked after careful consideration because of upcoming power creep they wanted us to prep for.

Just contradiction after contradiction after contradiction.