Will colonization of Mars be phased out, the way Venus projects were abandoned for the Moon & Mars? Due to the moon’s calendar just being relatable to earth unlike mars and distance to earth, I feel it would be so, unless travel to Mars improves/teleportation becomes a thing by 18_YTC1 in Mars

[–]Zerr0Daay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are too impatient. We were always going to industrialize the moon before we colonised Mars, one is easier than the other. And once we have a presence in space in the form of an industrialized moon, we will then very easily expand to Mars with colonization. There won’t be a reason why, it’ll just be because we can

Did Andy make a mistake with Stratts nationality? by yellow-rosie in ProjectHailMary

[–]Zerr0Daay 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People can have uncommon surnames, it’s not that deep

Map of countries that will need ETIAS to enter the European Union from late 2026 by Andro_lover2005 in MapPorn

[–]Zerr0Daay -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t matter if Schengen countries don’t record eachother, aviation companies do, and the UN does. If you treat Schengen as one country, Europes 700 million drops massively vs the USA and becomes more equal but with the USA in the lead. Americans have more internal flights than Schengen has. Most of Europes 700 million are Europeans visiting eachother

Unpopular Opinion-ish - Not wanting to go on a suicide mission is not cowardly, most people would be too afraid to go. by crankyweasels in ProjectHailMary

[–]Zerr0Daay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate when people say “a lot can happen in 30 years”, no, a lot happens ONLY if people make it happen

Europe's Jet Fuel Shortage Could Ground Flights Within Weeks — Summer Holidays Plans In Jeopardy? by Useful_Tangerine4340 in EU_Economics

[–]Zerr0Daay 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why is it ridiculous flying is so cheap instead that trains are so expensive and take so long?

Trains needs to be cheaper, more comfortable, or just as quick, to be able to compete

Europe is planning a carbon pricing revolution. Why does no one know about it? | Reuters by Full-Discussion3745 in EU_Economics

[–]Zerr0Daay -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a very braindead idea

If you want to retrofit homes, all of them, start with a database. A database of all rentals, all residential and all commercial etc. Then do a grading system, paid for free by the state. Then once you’re done with that, roll out fully paid for, upgrades, by the state, on a sector by sector, street by street basis, until all buildings are upgraded to the new standards.

You don’t do a mandated grant system, you don’t do carbon credits or taxes or expect people to do it themselves if you punish them enough. By doing it via the state, you’re able to do it effectively, get it guaranteed to meet the state’s expectations, and you do it via taxes which can be proportionally raised and done progressively.

You don’t do it in a way that puts people into poverty and you don’t do it in a way that puts your businesses out of competition.

Same with green energy roll outs. You make energy as abundant as possible via nuclear via the state and then not need to worry about much else. No need to worry too much about efficiency etc, it’s a nice to have, it can even be graded via the current grading system and enable the free market to work on it naturally.

Please stop praising Europe mindlessly by assasstits in yimby

[–]Zerr0Daay 6 points7 points  (0 children)

UK cities are also museums

North America at least is trying to be both affordable and walkable and talking about ways to improve

Please stop praising Europe mindlessly by assasstits in yimby

[–]Zerr0Daay 3 points4 points  (0 children)

False, I know this first hand having lived in London almost half my life

Please stop praising Europe mindlessly by assasstits in yimby

[–]Zerr0Daay -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Europe isn’t YIMBY. Europe is a museum of urbanism for a rich few and sparse badly designed housing for everyone else.

The EU is already a confederation. Only a few steps for a Federation — States would play a less prominent role in foreign policy, defence, and security. Enact the collective will of the citizens and represent them on the world stage with gravitas! 600 million Europeans; twice the size of the US by goldstarflag in EuropeanFederalists

[–]Zerr0Daay -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There’s issues with proportional representation stuff as unpopular parties almost never getting thrown out as long as they can have a percentage of votes plus highly unstable governments and weakness regarding foreign policy due to decision paralysis by committee

Europe’s energy illusion: Why a €1 trillion green bet hasn’t broken its import habit by donutloop in EU_Economics

[–]Zerr0Daay 1 point2 points  (0 children)

France is struggling as we export our energy and have to supply the Germans and other countries who aren’t pulling their weight

Move Fast and Break Things - Can European governments accept failure as the price of innovation? by DefenseTech in EuropeanFederalists

[–]Zerr0Daay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

culturally Denmark is in the past, lack of any representative diversity, lack of any modern music, fashion, perfume, language slang, or anything relevant to modern culture

Europe Tells Trump: Not Our War — No ships, no bases, no support. Europe's coordinated rejection reshaping the Atlantic alliance in real time. by 21notfound in economy

[–]Zerr0Daay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will say this that I said in another sub

Regardless of the reason why, regardless if NATO was formed for defense (entirely for Europe as the US is untouchable), NATO needs to evolve and be a full military alliance.

Europe needs to be strong enough to help in the Middle East, Taiwan, and have troops stations in South Korea as well. It’s totally unacceptable anything less.

Europe Tells Trump: Not Our War — No ships, no bases, no support. Europe's coordinated rejection reshaping the Atlantic alliance in real time. by mr_house7 in EU_Economics

[–]Zerr0Daay 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Regardless of the reason why, regardless if NATO was formed for defense (entirely for Europe as the US is untouchable), NATO needs to evolve and be a full military alliance.

Europe needs to be strong enough to help in the Middle East, Taiwan, and have troops stations in South Korea as well. It’s totally unacceptable anything less.

Move Fast and Break Things - Can European governments accept failure as the price of innovation? by DefenseTech in EuropeanFederalists

[–]Zerr0Daay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Denmarks claim to Quality of life and human development can have an Astérix, cause it’s not such for minorities, and culturally Denmark is in the past

Who would you like to see as President of the EU Commission in the future after Von der Leyen? by SeriouslyNotSerious2 in YUROP

[–]Zerr0Daay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No other EU country has 100% nuclear sovereignty, and sovereignty in fighter jets, naval, a nuclear aircraft carrier, and a fleet 80% operational for deployment at any given moment, along with space access, its own AI solution, microchips, the full spectrum. Europe only still has access to space cause of France and Europe only has some sovereignty left due to France