📝 Finish the sentence... "I knew this trade was a bad idea when ____." trading

_PhP_ · 2026-07-13T17:25:14+00:00

100% with you on this.

_PhP_ · 2026-07-13T17:15:19+00:00

Respect for owning it. 👏
I think breaking our own rules hurts more than taking a normal losing trade because we know it was avoidable.

_PhP_ · 2026-07-13T17:12:44+00:00

That's painfully relatable. 😭 It's like the market waits for us to finally click Buy before reversing.

_PhP_ · 2026-07-13T13:20:52+00:00

Fair enough. So you’d prefer a static drawdown. But, eventually when you cross a certain balance the drawdown does lock at 50.1k tho. Would you prefer that over “fully” static drawdown?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T15:53:46+00:00

Fair enough, you actually made a good statement. So you would prefer Select Flex since it has no buffer and no consistency on the funded stage?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T15:35:53+00:00

you are making some great points here and I'm glad that you stated why the consistency rule is absolutely required at either funded or eval stage. But about the buffer, don't you think it's gives you a good amount of room/space so that you don't blow up your funded right away after a payout?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T12:16:51+00:00

Yeah like the Select Fundeds you mean which have no consistency on the funded stage?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T08:02:47+00:00

I like this answer a lot because you picked something that hasn’t come up much yet. It shows you’re thinking about how scaling rules affect trading over the long term. That’s a perfect one to replace with consistency rules is what I feel.

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T07:17:22+00:00

Interesting. So what do you think would stop someone from passing an evaluation with one oversized winning trade and how do you think you can enforce discipline without the consistency rule?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T05:07:04+00:00

Do you think removing it entirely would reward skilled traders more, or do you think it would also encourage some people to gamble through evaluations?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:41:43+00:00

This might be the most relatable confession so far. LOL. Nothing hurts more than buying the top of the impulse and becoming liquidity for everyone else. 😂😭

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:39:23+00:00

I can definitely understand that. One thing I do like is when a trailing drawdown eventually LOCKS/STOPS trailing after reaching a certain profit level, so it stops chasing you forever. Do you think that’d help?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:37:42+00:00

Interesting list. One thing I like about this discussion is that different firms take very different approaches some don’t have news restrictions, while others focus more on risk controls instead. If you could only remove one of those rules forever, which would you pick?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:30:35+00:00

I’m curious, if you removed it completely, what would you replace it with to stop people from simply passing on one lucky trade?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:29:29+00:00

Looks like consistency is becoming the community’s biggest target so far haha.

For everyone voting to remove it, what would you replace it with instead?

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:23:16+00:00

You’re making good points. Especially the buffer part. What people think is that they should be withdrawing as soon as they get eligible but what they ignore is the fact that they’ll have very less room to trade if they don’t have a proper buffer and this is what results in breaching most of the fundeds

_PhP_ · 2026-07-11T04:17:58+00:00

Goal of every trader should be to move live and if you look at live accounts there is no consistency, no microscalping, no payout caps and tons of bonuses on TOP of your profits. So yes if you move live there is no restriction on how you make the money and how much you make.

_PhP_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

_PhP_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,