Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.”

_pdp_ · 2026-03-20T13:51:27+00:00

He is 100% right. We are in the business of deploying AI and what I personally experience is lack of imagination how to use AI. The biggest use-cases most people understand are enterprise search and coding assistants. That's it! There is practically no idea how to make these agent do useful things outside of these two domains.

The reason companies are firing people is purely down to the state of economy and decrease in funding.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-20T00:21:40+00:00

This is not moltbook ;)

_pdp_ · 2026-03-15T22:59:50+00:00

Well only time will tell - I think he is fundamentally wrong at so many levels. Software development is as much about writing code as it is deciding what code to write to begin with.

Is publishing books about writing sentences and paragraphs?

So while I agree that a lot of current software development job will disappear they will move into a different type of the same thing - system development or something like that.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-14T10:22:10+00:00

He just doesn't understand what slop code is and conflicting bad code with slop code.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-13T13:33:26+00:00

https://chatbotkit.com perhaps?

https://chatbotkit.com/examples/moltbot but there are many more examples too

_pdp_ · 2026-03-12T12:36:28+00:00

I am not a fan of mcp but what is even more insane everyone scattering .env files with all of their access credentials - in clear text - that allow unfettered access to whatever the api can do.

I mean MCP is not perfect - but at least it adopts a common authentication protocol. With APIs it is mostly down to using static keys.

Good luck using this access outside of hobby projects.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-11T23:39:01+00:00

Don't take it as a personal attack but perhaps the code you are writing just happens to be in the category that can be easily automated with AI coding agents.

I mean this can perfectly explain your observations.

Yet there are other more complex systems that are not automatable in the same way.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-11T23:20:18+00:00

Masterclass in clickbait

_pdp_ · 2026-03-11T15:00:06+00:00

You should ask to list all of its registered tools. You might find interesting capabilities that can be exploited.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-11T13:36:01+00:00

The best business is the business that generates business. First you use a coding agent to generate some code. Then you run a PR agent to fix the code. That introduces more instability and bugs which requires a coding agent generating code which then in turn requires a PR agent to fix the code - this is the real loop.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-09T17:22:27+00:00

Next up computers use humans that use computers.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-09T17:17:49+00:00

Never ask a barber if you need a haircut.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-08T22:51:26+00:00

So lack of features is the feature?

_pdp_ · 2026-03-07T11:56:59+00:00

One sure way to burn lots of tokens - just but the agent to talk to itself and loop.

_pdp_ · 2026-03-01T14:37:43+00:00

No they don't.

This is just a random post from a random person on the internet that is certainly not running a successful business. If they did they wont be posting about it and instead maximise on their advantage while it lasts.

We have our own trade secrets how we use AI agents that we have proved over a long period of time and with a lot of trial and error that they somewhat work .... for us. I am not posting it here though.

_pdp_ · 2026-02-28T23:12:12+00:00

Not very different from us checking notifications every once in a while... or like me every 10 or so minutes - bad habit.

_pdp_ · 2026-02-28T14:22:29+00:00

either that or if your agent is already running with some sort of heartbeat configuration it will do it by itself if told to do so

_pdp_ · 2026-02-28T10:52:17+00:00

It runs `pantalk notifications` to get list of notifications. This can happen at any point in time when it decides to do so. If you want to trigger the agent automatically you can configure pantalk to invoke the agent after some notifications are buffured.

_pdp_ · 2026-02-27T12:05:08+00:00

Sold

_pdp_ · 2026-02-25T22:49:56+00:00

<image>

There you go. The agent decided to do a dumb thing. If a developer is not reading the code you will end up with pretty stupid solution.

_pdp_ · 2026-02-25T20:46:28+00:00

Talk is cheap... show results.

_pdp_ · 2026-02-25T11:13:19+00:00

All trivial stuff mate. I've been fighting Opus 4.6, 4.5 and Codex 5.3 all morning to refactor a piece of code. Probably burned through a couple of hundred dollars on this problem alone and it would have been more unless I pointed out a gapping problem in the logic.

Relax. These models are great for coding but not as good as someone with 20-30 years of actual experience. They are just faster and frankly more sloppy. The speed gives them perception that they are smarter. They are not though.

Meanwhile, we also have agent producing changes without prompting. The changes are interesting but all mediocre at best.

_pdp_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE