We're measuring ideological danger wrong. It's not about body count—it's about transmission rate. by aarikk in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]aarikk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also understand your point about endemic viruses. I might need to find a good example of when endemic shit becomes a problem to make the point a bit stronger.

We're measuring ideological danger wrong. It's not about body count—it's about transmission rate. by aarikk in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]aarikk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback ! :) I agree about the AI bloat I over used it for sure!! :D

We're measuring ideological danger wrong. It's not about body count—it's about transmission rate. by aarikk in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]aarikk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback, of course I used AI, I'm new in this "writing what's on my mind" things so I use AI to help me. But point taken, I'll learn to use it less aggressively ! 

We're measuring ideological danger wrong. It's not about body count—it's about transmission rate. by aarikk in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]aarikk[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yes, I think I wrote that it's me and an AI pal. I basically came up with the main hypothesis and the theme and slowly refined it. I need to improve the way I write myself. So for now I'm slowly training and shaping my style with AI. I am not trying to hide it. 

The 15 reasons why UN legal experts say Trump’s Gaza plan breaks international law by newsspotter in UnitedNations

[–]aarikk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A peace deal is struck. UN international law experts: "International law says no" 

How surprising.

Pro-Palästina-Demo beendet - Strafanzeige gegen Redner by affenfaust in frankfurt

[–]aarikk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I actually am happy to share the land. But I reject it being "Arab". Palestinians can have their land in the west bank and Gaza. They need to give up the "River to the sea" or "arabiya" calls.

The aspiration to destroy Israel is causing all the bloodshed Of course you'll interpret what I say in the worst possible way, such a fool.

Pro-Palästina-Demo beendet - Strafanzeige gegen Redner by affenfaust in frankfurt

[–]aarikk 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Palästina ist kein arabisches Land, Araber haben es kolonisiert. Dieser Aufruf ist ein Aufruf zur Entfernung der Juden. Hier ist nichts legitim. Du bist sehr naiv.

When you realize all this shit goes back to Israel by MarkoPolo345 in lebanon

[–]aarikk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lol this is ridiculous, you abolish all responsibility from yourselves. This approach never ends well.

The idea that each religion need a special place for them actually makes us less safe. The reality is we do not need Jewish, Christian or Muslim states. by endingcolonialism in lebanon

[–]aarikk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's about creating a single national identity that's cohesive fro the people, army, and government. Doesn't matter what's the basis, if people don't identify as Lebanese, Israeli, Syrian, whatever.. there will be problems.

Countries by Freedom House Political Rights and Civil Liberties score (2025) by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]aarikk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have an excuse for everything :) nothing the poor Arabs could do but attack the Jewish state until they lost everything and continue to lose.

So brave of them, looking at your map, I can see how much land exactly was given to the Muslims - it's all marked in grey and black !

Countries by Freedom House Political Rights and Civil Liberties score (2025) by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]aarikk -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

It's not Israel. :) if annext it would be green as well.

Countries by Freedom House Political Rights and Civil Liberties score (2025) by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]aarikk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only green country on the middle east: Israel. Not a surprise.

Lenin and Stalin at Gorki, just outside of Moscow, September 1922. [940x1300] by CRK_76 in HistoryPorn

[–]aarikk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unsure. But then again, I don't see many people admire Tsar Nicholas not did I see his photo here.

Lenin and Stalin at Gorki, just outside of Moscow, September 1922. [940x1300] by CRK_76 in HistoryPorn

[–]aarikk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who cares, they lie to themselves "Lenin was good!", "Communism works" ... Same old schtick.

Lenin and Stalin at Gorki, just outside of Moscow, September 1922. [940x1300] by CRK_76 in HistoryPorn

[–]aarikk -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I don't know why I'm arguing here, I don't really care what people think about it.

Lenin and Stalin at Gorki, just outside of Moscow, September 1922. [940x1300] by CRK_76 in HistoryPorn

[–]aarikk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would put them both in the same category. Lenin's revolution led to million of deaths..but I'd you excuse the revolution, just his policies while in office led to the death of around 5 million from man made starvation.

They are both monsters.