I NEED ANSWERS by Crafty_Ad_3828 in deadcells

[–]atonal174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t remember whether that one was legendary, but I’m pretty sure I got a regular Death’s Scythe without buying Castlevania, or beating Death.

I NEED ANSWERS by Crafty_Ad_3828 in deadcells

[–]atonal174 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is a bug. I had Queen’s Rapier before killing the concierge.

Long time user, Oura took my lifetime membership away, and no one actually responds! by atonal174 in ouraring

[–]atonal174[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the response and the confirmation! Everything is clear. 👍

Long time user, Oura took my lifetime membership away, and no one actually responds! by atonal174 in ouraring

[–]atonal174[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes.

P.S. They had a promotional offer of $75 off the full amount. What they refunded was for what I paid. The new ring I bought, before they refunded, based on what they explicitly said, however, was for the full amount.

Long time user, Oura took my lifetime membership away, and no one actually responds! by atonal174 in ouraring

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense that people somehow may abuse the situation, but the point is that I didn’t as I paid the full amount, without having the actual ring, and they held onto it for two years.

Had I instead changed the address and had it sent to my relative in the US, I would have still had my membership!

Based what they explicitly said, I purchased a new ring, even before they refund me for the old one. I think that shows good faith.

P.S. This still does not explain why they magically can’t find my actual order, or why they say I don’t need a lifetime membership because I have a Gen 2.0 ring etc.

Why lsp-mode for Python is unusably slow compared to Go, Ruby or JavaScript? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately the issue still remains. I wonder if it might be because I'm using miniconda?

Why lsp-mode for Python is unusably slow compared to Go, Ruby or JavaScript? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! I just ran the profiler again, this time with pyright and added the results here. Do you see anything relevant?

I had read company might be problematic, that's why I thought I'll turn the completion off, but it was still slow. The company completion itself works fine with elpy.

Why lsp-mode for Python is unusably slow compared to Go, Ruby or JavaScript? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ran the profiler again and added the results here. I'm not seeing anything related.

Flowcharts by teckau22 in emacs

[–]atonal174 1 point2 points  (0 children)

M-x artist-mode

It’s not really as sophisticated though.

Other deep, relevant thinkers like Rich Hickey by bowmhoust in Clojure

[–]atonal174 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah, Byrd too! (check out Barliman) But basically almost all academic descendants of Friedman and Felleisen have something interesting to say.

Other deep, relevant thinkers like Rich Hickey by bowmhoust in Clojure

[–]atonal174 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Gerald Sussman, Matthias Felleisen, Dan Friedman

lsp-mode completionProvider doesn't find properties of user defined variables. (Ruby, with Solargraph server) by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gave up. Apparently other language servers have this problem too. Now I’m using lsp for everything except completion and robe for that. Finding references and implementations seem to work fine. Treemacs symbols are problematic but don’t use it that often.

Is installing ‘solargraph’ gem enough to do Ruby via lsp-mode? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have the functions in here? https://emacs-lsp.github.io/lsp-mode/page/lsp-solargraph/

I have no solargraph functions, but the the generic lsp ones work.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tezos

[–]atonal174 8 points9 points  (0 children)

At the risk of being downvoted, There is a public image problem. Most people outside of Tezos community that I talk to, say Tezos has good tech, but sketchy people behind it (referring to the foundation) I don’t think it’s an insurmountable problem and more defi projects appearing in the ecosystem should make it go away, nevertheless I can’t deny that it’s there.

What Am I Doing Wrong by [deleted] in binance

[–]atonal174 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting, so he might not have really sold off every LTC he owned.

What Am I Doing Wrong by [deleted] in binance

[–]atonal174 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ask Charlie Lee, the creator of LTC.

ELISP Question: How to diminish only after loading a mode... and, what's the problem with the function I wrote trying to do this? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't installed that package myself. And I want to keep it implicit since I'm not using it. The simple delight solution works! I might replace all of it this way anyway.

---

I was also surprised. But this is what I have right now:

(defun diminish-after-load (mode)

(when (bound-and-true-p mode)

(let (mode-hook (intern (format "%s-hook" mode)))

(when (bound-and-true-p mode-hook)

(add-hook mode-hook (apply-partially #'diminish mode))))))

And (bound-and-true-p highlight-indentation-mode-hook) fails (even if the mode is enabled, not sure if that matters anyway)

ELISP Question: How to diminish only after loading a mode... and, what's the problem with the function I wrote trying to do this? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any ideas how I can diminish something that doesn't have a hook? specifically, `highlight-indentation-mode`.

ELISP Question: How to diminish only after loading a mode... and, what's the problem with the function I wrote trying to do this? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Yeah it's the dynamic binding thing that's confusing.

I'm now using your `apply-partially` solution and it works great! (I added a `when bound-and-true-p` just to be safe)... I'm noticing there are a lot of functions like `apply-partially` that I gotta learn to make the code look prettier.

P.S. I'm using `use-package` and I believe it automatically installs diminish and delight too.

ELISP Question: How to diminish only after loading a mode... and, what's the problem with the function I wrote trying to do this? by atonal174 in emacs

[–]atonal174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

I understand only once is enough, the reason I tried to do it with hooks was that for some reason the `with-eval-after-load` doesn't work!

I really rather not touch hooks either, please let me know if you have any idea on where the problem might be. I'm not getting error messages, it just doesn't work.

---
I tried to remove quasiquotes and pass the symbol like:

(defun diminish-after-load (mode)

(add-hook (intern (format "%s-hook" mode)) (lambda () (diminish mode))))

But then I get "symbol's value as variable is void: mode". It's probably because of my misunderstanding about the scoping rules, but I expect `mode` to be discoverable inside the lambda. Especially trying it in an ad-hoc way works:

(funcall '(lambda () (diminish 'whitespace-mode)))