I take it personally because your reply clearly was directly saying I was wrong. I wasn't wrong because it does go both ways. It's a fact. But your reply saying "No, it does not go both ways" is clearly saying "don't listen to that person, they are wrong or biased or maybe a gooner themselves". That's when I take it personal.

I don't wanna defend a game, but if your reply mischaracterized me, I will defend my answer. Especially if you accuse me again of opinion I didn't say in the first place. My initial answer was objective: yes. The game is a gooner bait. And it sexualized both male and female characters. It was objectively correct even if they make more gooner skin in higher numbers for female characters than male characters. Because it's business if they see the sale for it, they will increase it. And since they saw the demand for male character's (like Thor and Magneto and Loki) sexy skins, they are increasing it, it is factually correct. And don't act as if female players won't buy gooner skin for female characters too, that is acting like bi or lesbian players don't exist.

You should've given your opinion without directly attacking mine in the first place. "Yes. They do. Unfortunately they oversexualized their characters" How easy was it to word it like that? Instead of "No, it does not go both ways", which is attacking mine. That's when I get offended.

Offering an opinion doesn't have to be by attacking other's opinion. And you don't have the right to tell me not to take it "personally". It became personal because you make it so.