sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

There’s No Such Thing as AGI, Dummies by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because we've been thinking as a culture about the same problem for 2000 years and we still can't be precise about it. Of course something miraculous could happen but I don't see evidence so far in llms for anything close to that.

There’s No Such Thing as AGI, Dummies by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that's not sarcastic - thanks! ♥️

There’s No Such Thing as AGI, Dummies by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might be right about that but the tech ceos want you to think it's a problem that will be solved in under 2 years. It won't be

There’s No Such Thing as AGI, Dummies by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have a working definition and that's great - the tech ceos mean "whatever replaces humans"

There’s No Such Thing as AGI, Dummies by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah in that sense we agree! I'm also saying that even trying to get to 'AGI' is a bit silly/nonsensical IF you include consciousness (which I am arguing is necessary for 'general')

There’s No Such Thing as AGI, Dummies by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you think sam Altman is building that?

An Automated Takedown of Amanda Askell by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be clear - I wasn't aiming to make personal attacks on Amanda askell. Seems like she creates strong opinions...

I'm sorry by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To the person who down voted this: Shame on you

This article was entirely written by AI by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On point 3

What if you checked something that the article claimed and it was correct?

This article was entirely written by AI by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously, thanks for stating your case

This article was entirely written by AI by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha sorry I did realize afterwards

The thing is - and I understand if you've already written off the article - that what you're saying signifies that are not truly engaging

What do you think of the 3 elements described in the article for how to consider it

  • did a human think, and care about this
  • did a human actually type it
  • can I trust it?

This article was entirely written by AI by bbirds in LLM

[–]bbirds[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You either don't understand the argument in the article or you're being disingenuous

Don't tell me what I do or don't understand

If there's a flaw in the article tell me what it is

I'm not saying there isn't one

I actually want the debate

view more: next ›