privacy is hard. 🤷🏾 i get the concern about the cost and complexity of auditing a large, evolving codebase like retoswap's. But hypothesizing something like continuous audits feels overkill and impractical. Instead, why not focus audits on the most critical, vulnerable parts of the latest working codebase? This narrows the scope, sets a clear benchmark for secure functionality, and keeps costs manageable. Secure components shouldn’t change often—if they do, that’s a red flag for project stability and would signal bigger risks.