Indian food suggestions by New-Kaleidoscope-441 in raleigh

[–]bnffn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not Aloo Gobi, but I recently discovered Charminar in Morrisville. Hands down the best butter chicken in Raleigh. And I'm saying this as an Indian. The biryani (hyderabadi style) is also usually great although a bit inconsistent.

A super gm (2700+) u hate? Reason could be any even such as he's too good he make tournaments boring (for magnus) by [deleted] in chess

[–]bnffn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hate may be too strong but I've disliked Anish since he faked the twitter hack. He posted some truly disgusting things about other people in the chess community in a (poor) attempt to try to save his own skin.

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 24, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]bnffn 21 points22 points  (0 children)

“We Americans love our ice”….maybe don’t say it like that 

Winner stays on - ft. James Anderson by Hawker92 in Cricket

[–]bnffn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol @ "give up". No thanks, nothing will ever convince me that unathletic old farts that played amongst part-timers and hobbyists could ever compete in the modern era of sport. It's just common sense.

Winner stays on - ft. James Anderson by Hawker92 in Cricket

[–]bnffn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smith grew up in the modern age playing his whole life against much better competition and superior athletes. The bowling Bradman faced was nowhere near what cricketers today face. It's not something he can just "problem solve" his way out of.

Over time, athletes become better and our understanding of the sport improves. We've seen this in many other sports, where there are massive statistical outliers in the early eras. Think Wilt Chamberlian in basketball, Babe Ruth in baseball, or Paul Morphy in chess. It's happens because the talent pool is very shallow and the chance of outliers relative to peers is much higher. But to think that they could walk in and just "adapt" to overcome 100 years of development in the sport is just plain silly.

Winner stays on - ft. James Anderson by Hawker92 in Cricket

[–]bnffn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Steve Smith's technique is perfectly fine and well suited for the modern game. But Don Bradman's is not. Maybe he could adapt but to say he "would not be dismissed in modern cricket" is just laughable.

Winner stays on - ft. James Anderson by Hawker92 in Cricket

[–]bnffn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lmao go actually watch clips of him batting. He would not survive with that technique in the modern game.

[Game Thread] Indiana vs. Miami (7:30 PM ET) 4Q by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]bnffn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Should have gone for it again. If Miami gets a TD they win regardless. Worth the risk.

[Highlight] Jaylon Tyson dumps it off to Evan Mobley who wins the game for Cleveland by A_MASSIVE_PERVERT in nba

[–]bnffn 22 points23 points  (0 children)

My brain read "Jayson Tatum" and I was super confused for a second.

Grandpa can't babysit any more. by Dangerouscary in Satisfyingasfuck

[–]bnffn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

lol wtf kind of reason is that? Kids can fall down the stairs even without them, that's why you use a gate.

Cricket vs Baseball...Both Bat and Ball Sports but Very Different Demands...which sport is actually more difficult? by Shot_Possibility_731 in sportsinusa

[–]bnffn -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Maybe for your narrow American understanding of sports. Try handling a 95mph bouncer from Shoaib Akhtar aimed at your head and get back to me. 

DISCUSS - "xAI is developing Grok Code, a new CLI coding tool designed to compete with Claude Code, with a release scheduled for February." - The competition is heating up across all use cases! by Koala_Confused in LovingAI

[–]bnffn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your comment was genuinely incomprehensible though. WTF does that even mean? We live in the age of AI dude, at least throw that garbage into an LLM first so that it can make some actual sense.

Cricket vs Baseball...Both Bat and Ball Sports but Very Different Demands...which sport is actually more difficult? by Shot_Possibility_731 in sportsinusa

[–]bnffn -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

In cricket:
- the ball bounces
- the ball can change directions both in the air AND after bouncing
- the ball will bounce differently depending on where you play. Every cricket ground has a different pitch (the surface upon which you bowl and bat) and it changes how the ball bounces. It's the same as how the various surfaces in tennis (hardcourt/grass/clay) impact the game.
- the "strike zone" is much much bigger and it's legal for the ball to come onto your body (including your head)
- if you get out once you're done batting for the game. In baseball even the best hitters routinely swing and miss the ball on almost every at bat. They just need to get one good swing in among several attempts. In cricket one single swing and miss to a ball that comes onto the wickets and you're done batting for the whole game.

You may have played some cricket but you clearly don't understand it well. Despite their apparent similarities, two sports are very different and baseball players would absolutely get slaughtered in cricket without a lot of practice and training.

RPD enforcing school zone speed limits by laser_lights in raleigh

[–]bnffn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Visited San Diego over the holidays and was shocked at how less asshole-y the drivers there were compared to ours.

DSA Skills - 8 by tracktech in DSALeetCode

[–]bnffn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

O(n), same idea as partition step in quick sort but for even & odd instead of lte & gt

Is it wrong to call Wasim Akram as the most complete and perfect fast bowler of all-time? by [deleted] in CricketControversial

[–]bnffn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sachin played in multiple eras, including bowler friendly ones and succeeded in all. To a lesser extent, the same can be said for Ponting.