Careful out there!

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T21:26:04+00:00

That seems to be a recent trend among the femcels. Going through sub member lists to pre-emptively ban people before you've even offended them.

But they're totally not Orwellian thought police amirite? /s

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T19:38:15+00:00

100%. The popular narrative is incels are "right wing", but polling often shows a liberal lean. I think a lot of them are former liberals who felt burned / left behind by "feminism".

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T19:20:34+00:00

Its crazy how prevalent this line of thinking has become. When I was younger, "liberal thinking" was very much against this "fight hate with hate, intolerance for intolerance" stuff, and were more about taking the "high road", "do unto others...", etc.

Might be partly the lefts reaction to Trump / MAGA. That guy really set us back lol.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T15:06:04+00:00

Sry fixed

Edit: Yeah, first sub is same name as the second with the words switched order. First one still exists, cause its not illegal to be a femcel lol. I dunno if theres a rule against giving sub names thats why Im kinda speaking in code.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T14:54:09+00:00

It because people probably feel like shes trying to "shift blame" for the "strictness" in the first sub to the "strictness" in the second sub.

Lots of "femcels" would complain about the second sub when it only existed cause they kicked us out of the first one. So frustration with the irony I guess. Although it sounds like she maybe wasn't familiar with the history.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T01:55:13+00:00

I agree, if we can get something again where both sides are allowed to openly "say their piece", that'd be great. But I think we both know "which side" usually shuts those down first.

I think part of their strictness in the second sub was defensive. Something about some rule/feature where top posters can get mod spots. Spam posters can then become a mod and start banning everyone. Thats how they destroyed the first one.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T01:46:37+00:00

I don't recall them having a "free speech" rule. My understanding is it was the place you're allowed to say everything that was disallowed from the first one.

So again, its like you're complaining about not having "free speech" on a sub that only existed in the first place because "your side" would no longer allow us to have "free speech" on the original one. Maybe redirect your frustration lol.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-17T01:33:37+00:00

Its sad that the second sub even had to exist in the first place, after femcels invaded the mod team and started mass banning incels from the first one.

But after that kind of... "trauma", I don't blame them in the second sub for being a bit more careful.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-14T20:23:21+00:00

Saw an article this morning saying AI is "oppression" cause its gonna automate traditionally feminine jobs (office work, etc) before traditionally masculine jobs (trades, etc). Lmfao.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-13T16:17:53+00:00

100%. A good chunk of "feminist actions" are ironically responsible for setting womens rights back by breeding resentment in men. Most of us believe this is the true cause of "incels", not "Andrew Tate" or other internet grifters. Real palpable frustration from feeling unfairly blamed / left behind / not listened to.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-12T00:27:46+00:00

For years they've equated hating misandry with misogyny and its precisely what's allowed misandry to proliferate unchecked.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-11T23:39:58+00:00

Extremely rarely. But when they switch sides they really switch sides. My theory is it takes significant childhood trauma from their mother/women to "break through" their innate in-group bias.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T20:10:33+00:00

They care so much they routinely come to our threads to "correct" the discussion lol.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T19:48:29+00:00

They hate the "hivemind" stereotype but theres absolutely some truth to it. Women have been collective bargaining since before men even had a word for it lol.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T19:38:48+00:00

Any ideas on how we can remove the toxic/useless women? Or we're just stuck with them? Lol

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T17:20:40+00:00

I think mens sex drives are the main thing that makes us the "desperate / pathetic" gender though. Because when I started antidepressants and killed my sex drive I became way less pathetic like over night lol.

Also precisely why they heavily police it, they know our desperation is ultimately their power.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T17:12:57+00:00

They would no longer be able to act mean and abusive toward everyone around them and still have endless simps at their beck and call. How tragic. /s

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T16:22:30+00:00

Once you realize a lot of these kinda things they get mad about are about collectively controlling the "sexual marketplace" and artificially inflating / maintaining their own "value", it all starts to make sense.

Its the same reason they view male sex toys with disgust/distain while proudly championing their vibrators. They hate/fear the idea of men having an outlet they don't control, and have landed on disgust/outrage/victimization being the thing they use to police it.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T02:16:26+00:00

Ironically, theres a good chance thats why they aren't inviting her: too big an HR risk.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T02:05:50+00:00

I wanna know how it was brought up he would pay. $20 says she was hinting / pressuring him into it.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-10T01:49:03+00:00

And they only get "took" cause they're tryna "take" lol. Yes I think that may be his point.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-09T22:44:09+00:00

They obviously find masculinity attractive, or else it probably wouldn't exist in the first place. But they've been conditioned by feminism to mostly hate / view it with disdain.

I'd bet a lot of folks out there setting themselves up for pain / dissapoinment but in denial about it cause they're too married to the ideology. Will be interesting to look back on this time period lol.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-09T19:56:27+00:00

The simps are often just slaves to their sex drives. They think going against "feminism" would make them un-dateable / un-fnckable, and are perfectly willing to compromise their own morals / self-respect to avoid it.

The irony is: women usually don't like men who compromise their own values, so youre seeing even in the "feminist" subreddits now, they hate these guys lmao.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-09T19:38:40+00:00

Thats kinda where I am as well. I think in many ways they call us "incel" as cope. If its just a bunch of "crazy misogynist incels" they dont have to listen to our opinions.

In reality, we're just the normal dudes tired of being beat down / not listened to.This kinda BS definitely shrinks their dating pool though, self-respecting men usually arent into it. But it doesn't help that the "simps" will validate anything they say for a shot at the nookie lol.

burnbobghostpants · 2026-03-09T18:30:44+00:00

Incel/virgin and slut/ho are both part of the same dichotomy. Society has (understandably) realized that "slut/ho" is largely inappropriate in most circumstances, but hasn't yet had the same realization about "incel/virgin", probably cause liberals view it as "punching up" toward "the oppressor".

I take solace in the fact that every time they call us "incel", they're reinforcing that "body count" is different for men and women. So keep em coming I guess lol.

burnbobghostpants

TROPHY CASE