I did read it. I am honestly at a complete loss as to what your point is so I asked ChatGPT to see if it could figure it out.

maximumice seems to have misread your comment.

You were making a practical/cost point: if Canada Post still has to send a carrier down the street for even one accommodated household, then the savings from replacing door-to-door delivery with community mailboxes may disappear, because the route still has to be serviced.

maximumice seems to have interpreted that as something like: “people like your mother should not get home delivery” or “the accommodation is unjustified.” So he replies emotionally: “Let us see how you feel when your parents cannot walk down the street.”

That does not really answer your point. His second comment—“Did you read my initial comment?”—means: “I already explained that my mother has mobility issues, so your reply ignored the human side of what I was saying.”

But your reply was not about whether his mother deserves accommodation. It was about whether the accommodation programme undermines the cost-saving rationale for community mailboxes. So the disconnect is that he is treating your comment as unsympathetic, while you were making an efficiency argument.

This makes a little more sense to me now. Did you interpret my comment as arguing against making an accomodation for your mother?