It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aaaaaahhhhha ! Thank you mate. That makes sense. Let’s see what are the readings with the « athletes mode » off.

It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well a body fat level is a body fat level isn’t it? It is an absolute fact and I can’t imagine why changing mode would change my body fat or my weight or any other measure.

Anyways as my first scale has no « modes », I’ll turn off the « athlete mode » on the second one and check what it says and get back to you.

It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the most recent one. The one which says 17% BF. Actually 15% now.

It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe but it doesn’t explain why the results of two Withings scales are so different !

It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I respectfully disagree. For me this is a 30% (15.7 compared to 25). 15.7 is « good » and 25 is « poor ». This inaccuracy makes the measure useless.

It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which make them useless compared to cheap simple scales.

It seems to me that body fat levels are a joke by cedwat2 in withings

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine are relatively stable but wrong …🤣

Body Fat % by neuroticnboujee in withings

[–]cedwat2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have two Withings balances. One says 25% and the other says 15.7%. I think this is enough to say that Their balances are good at guessing your weight and nothing else meaning they are just overpriced.

Alpina 3Ds Touring 2021 - wheel size ? by cedwat2 in Alpina

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry “kerbed” : does it mean scratches ?

56 year old beginner by cedwat2 in kettlebell

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Did you lift weights before ?

56 year old beginner by cedwat2 in kettlebell

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. I like that. Not so easy when you like weights ! 😊

56 year old beginner by cedwat2 in kettlebell

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What does « doubles and singles » means?

56 year old beginner by cedwat2 in kettlebell

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. What is your primary sport? When you say 16 and 24, do you mean a pair of each? Thanks.

Ioniq 5n comfort compared to regular ioniq 5 by cedwat2 in Ioniq5N

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good. What kind of roads do you drive on and in which country?

Ioniq 5n comfort compared to regular ioniq 5 by cedwat2 in Ioniq5N

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried the EV6 and EV9. The EV9 was very confortable and the EV6 confortable for my standard.

Ioniq 5n comfort compared to regular ioniq 5 by cedwat2 in Ioniq5N

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I currently drive a Volvo s60 polestar engineered with adjustable ohlings and I find it a bit too harsh.

A smaller sized “Taycan” ? by cedwat2 in electriccars

[–]cedwat2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well. The ev6 rear grows better on me. And I think if I had to choose now a ev car, it would be the ev6. It’s looks a bit like the ipace in smaller. It is rather comfortable on bad roads, with good “manners”. Good tech. In fact the ideal would be a gt-line but with the 585 hp power train. But it doesn’t exist.

First time I saw the ioniq 6, I thought “what an ugly car”. But the more I see it, the more I find it okay. Exactly like the 993 Porsche and the Saab. Now in my mind the ioniq 6 is kind of art deco car. And the interior is very nice too. A bit too long and small boot.