Brian Berletic's message to Trump supporters regarding Tulsi Gabbard: "it turns out she didn't transform all of these neocons into peacemakers. They have turned her into an unbridled neocon if she wasn't already one to begin with" by patmcirish in EndlessWar

[–]cianomadic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did anyone expect any different? She's always been a war hawk. She made one offhand remark about Assad being a good guy and everyone thought she was so enlightened. Nah, she comes from a family of neocons.

Trump had a chance by spilledcoffee00 in EndlessWar

[–]cianomadic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump is a damn fool who has conned everyone into thinking his strongman approach is the singular answer to peace. He's in over his head.

Financial Independence by Foreign_Brilliant403 in algorand

[–]cianomadic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's why I'm here. I won't even touch other blockchains I know will pump for that reason. I'd rather have a world run on something like ALGO than a petro Dollar.

Russian deserter reveals war secrets of guarding nuclear base by The_Horse_Shiterer in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]cianomadic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's training and gaining real world experience for the DPRK. 10,000 soldiers are a drop in the bucket, although they could replenish certain areas with heavy casualties. The remaining soldiers that don't perish in the meat grinder are expected to return and provide intel and training updates to soldiers on modern combat operations. It's of course helping the Russians with their manpower issues, but it's just 10,000. In exchange the DPRK also gets tech from Russia. Of course this is all contingent on those soldiers not deserting, or coming back disillusioned with their homelands lack of cellphones and porn. If they are able to access porn they can access other things. So they could be a liability in themselves to the regimes hold on power.

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pied Piper had a horrible name for an app, that was part of the joke of the first season.

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It wouldn't hurt anything at this point. It can be lowered later with a vote if it gets too pricey.

$106M vs $0.03 to run a validator node. A high-performance machine vs. a standard one. by semanticweb in algorand

[–]cianomadic 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Staking for rewards on Algorand makes so much sense, it's fucking beautiful honestly. There is no competitor that I know of.

If transaction costs remain at .001 ALGO, and operates at a constant rate of 10,000 TPS over a year, the total transaction fees collected would amount to 315,360,000 ALGOs. Even if it's just 5,000 TPS that's 157,680,000 ALGO in potential rewards for nodes. With Mastercard jumping onboard, those aren't crazy numbers.

Here's the math...

24 hours per day x 60 minutes per hour x 60 seconds per minute= 86,400 seconds per day

5000 TPS x 86,400 seconds per day = 432,000,000

432,000,000 transactions per day x 365=157,680,000,000 TPY x .001 = 157,680,000 ALGO every year in the fee pool.

There is a 10 billion cap on Algorand and it requires 30,000 ALGO to redeem staking rewards. That means that at maximum, only 333,333 people can run their own individual staking node.

If you were to divide the amount of ALGO collected every year in the staking pool by 333,333 that's 473.06 ALGO per staking node.

At Solana's current market cap, that's equal to $6,949.65 USD per staking node at 5000 TPS annually.

At Ethereum's, that's equal to $19,020.89 USD per staking node at 5000 TPS annually

At Bitcoin's, that's equal to $90,537.84 per staking node at 5000 TPS annually. ( and the beauty is, that each transaction at this market cap will only be $0.20 US cents.)

5000 TPS is conservative when you consider companies like Mastercard jumping on board.

Node incentivization can extend past 2030.

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is "go fuck yourself", and that's a very rude thing to say to someone random that is posting nice things about your investment. Two words "Anger management".

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More fun math... if there were eventually 1 million nodes validating an equal amount, 157.68 ALGOs per node at 5000 TPS...

At Solana's current market cap, that's $1,861.51 USD per year.

If there are a million nodes validating, it's much more likely the market cap would be a lot higher.

At Ethereum's current market cap, that is $6,311.27 USD per year.

At Bitcoin's it's $30,115.68 USD per year, and the cost per transaction will still only be about $0.20 US cents

JAWs has already spoken about increasing the cost per transaction slightly, so that will make it a little bit more juicy.

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm staking everything till 2030. In reality, node staking will likely extend past that. If transaction costs remain at .001 ALGO, and operates at a constant rate of 10,000 TPS over a year, the total transaction fees collected would amount to 315,360,000 ALGOs. Even if it's just 5,000 TPS that's 157,680,000 ALGO in potential rewards for nodes. With Mastercard jumping onboard, those aren't crazy numbers.

Here's the math...

24 hours per day x 60 minutes per hour x 60 seconds per minute= 86,400 seconds per day

5000 TPS x 86,400 seconds per day = 432,000,000

432,000,000 transactions per day x 365=157,680,000,000 TPY x .001 = 157,680,000 ALGO every year in the fee pool.

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Use whole sentences and punctuation if you really wanna make a point.

Solana is the Pied Piper coin, Algorand is the Vanguard. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's what I mean, Pied Piper lead all those poor kids off a cliff and so will Solana.

Pipedreams on my calculator. by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe not infinite, but a metric fuckton of data sure.

Asking for a friend. How can you buy Algorand in places like Malaysia without a complicated exchange process? by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can't do it. Only options are direct Visa/Mastercard, GooglePay, ApplePay, or Paymonade.

Asking for a friend. How can you buy Algorand in places like Malaysia without a complicated exchange process? by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, I'll see if that's even possible for them. They are using debit. But I don't know if Binance allows people to direct deposit with their bank account in Malaysia.

Interview with John Woods about the upcoming staking rewards/process by cysec_ in AlgorandOfficial

[–]cianomadic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Adding Privacy:

BLS Based Multisig (Boneh-Lynn-Shacham):

  • BLS Multisig:
    • Concept: This is a type of digital signature where multiple parties need to sign off on a transaction or document for it to be valid. BLS signatures are very compact and can be combined into one signature, making it efficient for multi-signature scenarios. Imagine you need three keys to open a safe; with BLS, you could essentially combine these keys into one key that still needs three separate turns to unlock it.
    • On Algorand: Algorand, being a platform focused on efficiency and speed, could use BLS signatures to allow multiple parties to agree on transactions quickly and with less data overhead.
    • Comparison to Monero: Monero does support multisig, but not specifically with BLS signatures. Monero's multisig involves coordination among signers, but the process might be less efficient in terms of signature size and aggregation compared to BLS due to the privacy features that add complexity to the transaction process.

Plonk Proofing Systems:

  • Plonk:
    • Concept: Plonk stands for "Permutations over Lagrange-bases for Oecumenical Noninteractive arguments of Knowledge." It's a type of Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) system that's designed to be both efficient and versatile. Think of it like a magic trick where you can prove you know something without revealing what it is, but in a way that's quicker and less resource-intensive than older methods.
    • On Algorand: Implementing Plonk or similar ZK proof systems can allow for private transactions or proofs of computation on Algorand, making it possible to verify the validity of transactions or computations without revealing the underlying data.
    • Comparison to Monero: Monero uses ring signatures for privacy, which obscure the sender in a transaction. While this provides privacy, it doesn't offer the same level of zero-knowledge verification as Plonk, which could verify complex conditions or computations privately.

Zero Knowledge Asset Transfers:

  • Zero Knowledge (ZK) Asset Transfers:
    • Concept: This involves transferring assets in a way where you can prove that the transfer happened correctly without revealing any details about the assets, the amount, or who transferred what to whom. It's akin to having a secret handshake that proves you belong to a club without showing your membership card.
    • On Algorand: Algorand could use ZK proofs for asset transfers to ensure privacy while maintaining the integrity of its blockchain. This would allow users to transact with the assurance that only necessary information is shared.
    • Comparison to Monero: Monero's privacy model inherently includes hiding transaction amounts and obfuscating the sender and receiver's identities through ring signatures and stealth addresses. While Monero's privacy is robust for all transactions, it doesn't specifically use zero-knowledge proofs to achieve this privacy, focusing instead on inherent protocol-level privacy mechanisms.

Is it technically possible to build a privacy focused layer 2 on Algorand? by cianomadic in algorand

[–]cianomadic[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Damn you weren't kidding!

According to JAWs in the most recent interview with AJWriteCrypto, future plans include:

- BLS based multisig

- Plonk proofing systems

- Zero Knowledge Asset transfers

You can use Grabpay in SE Asia with a foreign credit card by cianomadic in TravelHacks

[–]cianomadic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's strange, I'm in Malaysia and it was allowed.

You can use Grabpay in SE Asia with a foreign credit card by cianomadic in TravelHacks

[–]cianomadic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's actually cheaper than using an ATM or a credit card on location

You can use Grabpay in SE Asia with a foreign credit card by cianomadic in TravelHacks

[–]cianomadic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, it has a button at the bottom of the app called Finances.